Abstract
The Fromm–Marcuse debate in Dissent magazine published in 1955–56 was a defining moment in the intellectual careers of both theorists, and has helped define the reception of Freud for Frankfurt School scholars for over 50 years now. The literature on this debate about psychoanalytic theory and radical politics gave rise to numerous polemics between pro-Fromm and pro-Marcuse partisans, much of it now outdated as critical theorists have come to understand that they have more in common with each other than with mainstream social sciences. This chapter reviews the history of this theoretical debate on the status of Freudian theory in critical theory, and offers a synthetic reappraisal of the insights both theorists offer for a contemporary analysis of character and authoritarianism in light of contemporary debates within psychoanalysis and recent developments in Frankfurt School scholarship on the ideas and careers of both Fromm and Marcuse. The chapter discusses what a critical theory of authoritarianism offers social philosophy and social sciences in the contemporary context of capitalist crisis, cultural chaos, violence and impending environmental disaster.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, Kevin. 2015. Fromm, Marx and humanism. In Toward a human science: The relevance of Erich Fromm for today, ed. Rainer Funk, and Neil McLaughlin. Giessen: Psychocozial-Verlag.
Anderson, Kevin, and Russell Rockwell. 2012. The Dunayevskaya-Marcuse-Fromm correspondence, 1954–1978: Dialogues on Hegel, Marx, and critical theory. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Bonss, Wolfgang. 1984. Introduction. In Erich Fromm the working class in Weimar Germany. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Braune, Joan. 2014. Erich Fromm’s revolutionary hope: Prophetic messianism as a critical theory of the future. Amsterdam: Sense Publishers.
Bronner, Stephen Eric. 1990. Socialism unbound. NewYork: Routledge.
———. 1994. Of critical theory and its theorists. Oxford: Blackwell.
Brunner, Jose. 1994. Looking into the hearts of the workers, or: How Erich Fromm turned critical theory into empirical research. Political Psychology 15(4): 631–654.
Burston, Daniel. 1991. The legacy of Erich Fromm. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Buzby, Amy. 2013. New foundations for resistance: The Marcuse-Fromm debate revisited. In Subterranean politics and Freud’s legacy, ed. Amy Buzby, 93–113. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Chancer, Lynn. 1992. Sadomasochism in everyday life: The dynamics of power and powerlessness. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Chodorow, Nancy. 1985. Beyond drive theory. Theory and Society 14(3): 271–319.
Collins, Randall. 2009. The sociology of philosophies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Duncan, Christopher Brian. 2013. Love and its refusal: Love, historical memory, and the meaning of perversion in the Fromm-Marcuse feud. MA thesis, University of Texas-Austin.
Durkin, Kieran. 2014. The radical humanism of Erich Fromm. New York: Palgrave.
Friedman, Lawrence J. with A.M. Schreiber. 2013. The lives of Erich Fromm’s love’s prophet. New York: Columbia University Press.
Fromm, Erich. 1955a. The sane society. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.
———. 1955b The human implications of “instinctivistic” radicalism: A reply to Herbert Marcuse. Dissent 2(4): 342–349.
———. 1956a. The art of loving. New York: Harper & Row.
———. 1956b. A counter-rebuttal. Dissent 3(1): 81–83.
———. 1958. Psychoanalysis: Scientism or fanaticism. The Saturday Review 41: 11–13.
———. 1959. Sigmund Freud’s mission. New York: Doubleday.
———. 1961a. Marx’s concept of man. New York: Continium.
———. 1961b. May man prevail? New York: Doubleday.
———. 1964. The heart of man. New York: Harper & Row.
———. [1941] 1969. Escape from freedom. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.
———. 1973. The anatomy of human destructiveness. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
Fromm, Erich, and Michael Maccoby. 1970. Social character in a Mexican village: A socio-psychoanalytic study. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Funk, Rainer. 1982. Erich Fromm: The courage to be human. New York: Continuum.
Howe, Irving. 1984. A margin of hope: An intellectual autobiography. New York: Harcourt.
Jacoby, Russell. 1975. Social amnesia: A critique of conformist psychology from Adler to Laing. Boston: Beacon.
———. 1986. The repression of psychoanalysis: Otto Fenichel and the Freudians. New York: Basic.
———. 1987. The last intellectuals: American culture in the age of academe. New York: Basic Books.
Jay, Martin. 1973. The dialectical imagination: A history of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research. Boston: Little, Brown, Boston.
Kellner, Douglas. 1984. Herbert Marcuse and the crisis of Marxism. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 1992. Erich Fromm, feminism, and the Frankfurt School. http://www.fromm-gesellschaft.eu/images/pdf-Dateien/FF-Schule92/Kellner_D_1991.pdf
———. 1992. Erich Fromm, feminism, and the Frankfurt School. Lecture Given to the Symposium on „Erich Fromm und die Frankfurter Schule“ on June 1, 1991, Stuttgart (Typoscript) 1991: 2–18 – Republished on Kellner’s website.
Lasch, Christopher. 1991. The culture of narcissism: American life in an age of diminishing expectations. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Marcuse, Herbert. 1955. The social implications of Freudian revisionism. Dissent 2: 3.
———. [1956a] 2015. Eros and civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud. Boston: Beacon Press.
———. 1956b. A reply to Erich Fromm. Dissent 3: 79–81.
———. [1964] 2013. One-dimensional man: Studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. London: Routledge.
McLaughlin, Neil. 1996. Nazism, nationalism and the sociology of emotions: Escape from freedom revisited. Sociological Theory 14(3): 241–261.
———. 1998a. How to become a forgotten intellectual: Intellectual movements and the rise and fall of Erich Fromm. Sociological Forum 13: 215–246.
———. 1998b. Why do schools of thought fail? Neo-Freudianism as a case study in the sociology of knowledge. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 34(2): 113–134.
———. 1999. Origin myths in the social sciences: Fromm, the Frankfurt School, and the emergence of critical theory. Canadian Journal of Sociology 24(1): 109–139.
———. 2001a. Optimal marginality: Innovation and orthodoxy in Fromm’s revision of psychoanalysis. The Sociological Quarterly 42(2): 271–288.
———. 2001b. Critical theory meets America: Riesman, Fromm, and the lonely crowd. American Sociologist 2(1): 5–26.
———. 2008. Collaborative circles and their discontents. Revisiting conflict and creativity in Frankfurt School critical theory. Sociologica 2(2): 1–35.
Rickert, John. 1986. The Fromm–Marcuse debate revisited. Theory and Society 15(3): 181–214.
Riesman, David. 1950. The lonely crowd: A study of the changing American character. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Roazen, Paul. 1996. Fromm’s courage. In A prophetic analyst: Erich Fromm’s contributions to psychoanalysis, ed. Mauricio Cortina, and Michael Maccoby. Northvale: Jason Aronson.
Srivastava, Sarita. 2005. “You’re calling me a racist?” The moral and emotional regulation of antiracism and feminism. Signs 31(1): 29–62.
Stirk, Peter. 1999. Eros and civilization revisited. History of the Human Sciences 12(1): 73–90.
Wheatland, Thomas. 2009. Frankfurt School in exile. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Wiggerhaus, Rolf. 1986. The Frankfurt School: Its history, theories and political significance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McLaughlin, N. (2017). The Fromm–Marcuse Debate and the Future of Critical Theory. In: Thompson, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Theory. Political Philosophy and Public Purpose. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55801-5_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55801-5_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55800-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55801-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)