More with Less: Sensemaking of Controversies in Youth Care Reforms

Chapter

Abstract

In Chapter 9, von Raesfeld and van der Helm develop a framework to analyze sensemaking of controversies in innovation processes. Drawing on their framework, the authors investigate the controversies that arise when a group of municipalities used several management instruments to enhance innovation in a youth care system. Municipalities and care providers socio-cognitively constructed controversies: however, the engagement in the controversies was only marginal. The authors claim that the combination of socio-cognitive construction and the limited engagement in controversies hindered innovation in youth care. Explanations for limited engagement are the use of espoused theories instead of theories in use, the uncontested position of power taken by the municipalities, and the emergence of controversies that are not crucial to the actors.

References

  1. Argyris, C. (1976). Single-loop and double-loop models in research on decision making. Administrative Science quarterly, 21(3), 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization science, 15(5),555–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Håkansson, H.,& Waluszewski, A. (2007). Knowledge and innovation in business and industry: The importance of using others. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Håkansson, H.,& Waluszewski, A. (2011). Co-evolution in technological development the role of friction. Sinergie, 58(2), 171–190.Google Scholar
  8. Hardy, C. (1996). Understanding power: Bringing about strategic change. British Journal of Management, 7(s1), S3–S16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hoholm, T., & Olsen, R. I. (2012). The contrary forces of innovation. A conceptual model for studying networked innovation processes. Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 344–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. La Rocca, A., Hoholm, T., & Mørk, B. E. (2017). Practice theory and the study of interaction in business relationships: Some methodological implications. Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Langley, A., & Sloan, P. (2011). Organizational change and dialectic processes. In D. M. Boje, B. Brurnes, & J. Hassard (Eds.) The routledge companion to organizational change (pp. 261–275). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford university press.Google Scholar
  14. Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis, M. W., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradox as a metatheoretical perspective: Sharpening the focus and widening the scope. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 50(2), 127–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Seo, M. G., & Creed, W. D. (2002). Institutional contradictions, praxis, and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 222–247.Google Scholar
  18. Venturini, T. (2010). Diving in magma: How to explore controversies with actor-network theory. Public Understanding of Science, 19(3), 258–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. von Raesfeld Meijer, A. (1997). Technological cooperation in networks: A socio-cognitive approach. Enschede: University of Twente.Google Scholar
  20. von Raesfeld Meijer, A. (1998). Missing the bus: a socio-cognitive perspective on technological networks. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2(02), 161–182.Google Scholar
  21. Waluszewski, A., & Wagrell, S. (2013). Public purchasing policy as innovation killer. IMP Journal, 7(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  22. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  23. Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Entrepreneurship, Strategy, International Business and Marketing (NIKOS)University of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Elly van der Helm ConsultingAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations