Skip to main content
Book cover

Young People Transitioning from Out-of-Home Care pp 3–21Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

The Double-Bind: Looked After Children, Care Leavers and Criminal Justice

Abstract

Research attention has focused on the reasons that lead young people from care to come into contact with the justice system at higher rates than young people within the general population. Findings from this literature can be distilled into three main themes. Firstly, many young people in care have experienced a range of adversities that place them at higher risk of offending. Secondly, the care experience may in itself be ‘criminogenic’. Thirdly, the transition to adulthood for young people leaving care is often compressed and accelerated, placing them at increased vulnerability to a range of negative outcomes. This chapter reviews this literature and argues that the findings from research on desistance may provide a useful framework for considering future areas of research and implications for practice.

Keywords

  • Young People
  • Criminal Justice System
  • Foster Care
  • Residential Care
  • Social Bond

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-55639-4_1
  • Chapter length: 19 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-137-55639-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–87.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, R. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38(4), 319–361.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, D. (2004). A risky business? Research policy, governmentality and youth offending. Youth Justice, 4(2), 100–117.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ashford, B., & Morgan, R. (2004). Criminalising looked-after children. Criminal Justice Matters, 57(1), 8–38.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Barn, R., & Tan, J. (2012). Foster youth and crime: Employing general strain theory to promote understanding. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(3), 212–220.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, M. (2010). Promoting desistance among young people. In W. Taylor, R. Earle, & R. Hester (Eds.), Youth justice handbook: Theory, policy and practice (pp. 158–167). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blades, R., Hart, D., Lea, J., & Wilmott, N. (2011). Care – A stepping stone to custody? (London: Prison Reform Trust). Available at:http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/Portals/0/Documents/careasteppingstonetocustody.pdf

  • Carr, N. (2014). Invisible from view: Leaving and aftercare provision in the Republic of Ireland. Australian Social Work, 67(1), 88–101.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, N., Dwyer, C., & Larrauri, E. (2015). Young people, criminal records and employment barriers. Belfast: NIACRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashmore, J., & Paxman, M. (2006). Predicting aftercare outcomes: The importance of ‘felt’ security. Child and Family Social Work, 11(3), 232–241.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cavadino, M., & Dignan, J. (2005). Penal systems. A comparative approach. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipriani, D. (2009). Children’s rights and the minimum age of criminal responsibility. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, M. E., Hook, J. L., & Lee, J. S. (2010). Distinct subgroups of former foster youth during young adulthood: Implications for policy and practice. Chicago: Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuneen, C., White, R., & Richards, K. (2011). Juvenile justice: Youth and crime in Australia. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusick, G. R., & Courtney, M. E. (2007). Offending during late adolescence. How do youth aging out of care compare with their peers? Issue brief. Chicago: Chapin Hall Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusick, G. R., Havlicek, J. R., & Courtney, M. E. (2012). Risk for arrest: The role of social bonds in protecting foster youth making the transition to adulthood. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(1), 19–31.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Darker, I., Ward, H., & Caulfield, L. (2008). An analysis of offending by young people looked after by local authorities. Youth Justice, 8(2), 134–148.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dunkel, F. (2015). Juvenile justice and crime policy in Europe. In F. E. Zimring, M. Langer, & D. S. Tannehaus (Eds.), Juvenile justice in global perspective (pp. 9–62). New York: New York University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Farrall, S., Bottoms, A., & Shapland, J. (2010). Social structures and desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 7(6), 546–570.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Farrall, S., Sharpe, G., Hunter, B., & Calverley, A. (2011). Theorising structural and individual level processes in desistance and persistence: Outlining an integrated perspective. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 44(2), 218–234.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. (1996). Understanding and preventing youth crime. York: JRF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (2007). Childhood risk factors and risk-focused prevention. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The oxford handbook of criminology (pp. 602–640). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, C. (2011). What is the difference between ‘desistance’ and ‘resilience’? Exploring the relationship between two key concepts. Youth Justice, 11(3), 221–234.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, C. (2014). Achieving justice for children in care and care leavers. Howard league what is justice? Working papers 14/2014. Available at: https://d19ylpo4aovc7m.cloudfront.net/fileadmin/howard_league/user/pdf/Research/What_is_Justice/HLWP_14_2014.pdf

  • France, A. (2008). Risk factor analysis and the youth question. Journal of Youth Studies, 11(1), 1–15.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fransson, E., & Storo, J. (2011). Dealing with the past in the transition from care. A post-structural analysis of young people’s accounts. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(12), 2519–2525.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, P. M. (2015). Questioning tales of ‘ordinary magic’: ‘Resilience’ and neo-liberal reasoning. British Journal of Social Work. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcv017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P., Cernkovich, S., & Rudolph, J. (2002). Gender, crime and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 990–1064.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, K., & Case, S. (2008). The rhetoric and reality of the ‘Risk Factor Prevention Paradigm’ approach to preventing and reducing youth offending. Youth Justice, 8(1), 5–20.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, C. (2010). Offending behavior in care: Is children’s residential care a criminogenic environment? Child and Family Social Work, 15(4), 461–472.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, D. (2014). Becoming a desister. Exploring the role of agency, coping and imagination in the construction of a new self. British Journal of Criminology, 54(5), 873–891.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, A. (2014). Independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation in rotherham 1997–2013. Available at: http://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/file/1407/independent_inquiry_cse_in_rotherham

  • Jonson-Reid, M., & Barth, R. P. (2000). From placement to prison: The path to adolescent incarceration from child welfare supervised foster or group care. Children and Youth Services Review, 22(7), 493–516.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemian, L. (2007). Desistance from crime: Theoretical, empirical, methodological and policy considerations. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23(1), 5–27.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H. (2002). Risk, social policy and welfare. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, E., Rolock, N., Cross, T. P., & Eblen-Manning, J. (2014). What explains instability in foster care? Comparison of a matched sample of children with stable and unstable placements. Children and Youth Services Review, 37, 36–45.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice (Vol. 28, pp. 1–69). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leathers, S. J. (2006). Placement disruption and negative placement outcomes among adolescents in long-term foster care: The role of behavior problems. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30(3), 307–324.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • LeBel, T., Burnett, R., Maruna, S., & Bushway, S. (2008). The ‘chicken and egg’ of subjective and social factors in desistance from crime. European Journal of Criminology, 5(2), 131–159.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., & Berrick, J. D. (2014). Experiences of youth who transition to adulthood out of care: Developing a theoretical framework. Children and Youth Services Review, 46, 78–84.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. S., Courtney, M. E., & Hook, J. L. (2012). Formal bonds during the transition to adulthood: Extended foster care support and criminal/legal involvement. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 6(3), 255–279.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. S., Courtney, M. E., & Tajima, E. (2014). Extended foster care support during the transition to adulthood. Effect on the risk of arrest. Children and Youth Services Review, 42, 34–42.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild, B. (2011). Conflict resolution, restorative justice approaches and bullying in young people’s residential units. Children and Society, 25(1), 47–58.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, R., Shildrick, T., Webster, C., & Simpson, D. (2005). Growing up in poor neighbourhoods: The significance of class and place in the extended transitions of ‘socially excluded’ young adults. Sociology, 39(5), 873–891.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Malvaso, C. G., & Delfabbro, P. (2015). Offending behavior among young people with complex needs in the Australian out-of-home care system. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 3561–3569 doi:10.1007/s10826-015-0157-z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McAlister, S., & Carr, N. (2014). Experiences of youth justice: Youth justice discourses and their multiple effects. Youth Justice, 14(3), 241–254.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McAra, L., & McVie, S. (2007). Youth justice? The impact of system contact on patterns of desistance and offending. European Journal of Criminology, 4(3), 315–345.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, F., Farrall, S., Lightowler, C., & Maruna, S. (2012). How and why people stop offending: Discovering desistance (Institute for Research and Innovation in the Social Sciences). Available at: http://www.iriss.org.uk/sites/default/files/iriss-insight-15.pdf

  • Mendes, P., & Moslehuddin, B. (2006). From dependence to interdependence: Towards better outcomes for young people leaving state care. Child Abuse Review, 15(2), 110–126.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes, P., Snow, P., & Baidawi, S. (2014). Young people transitioning from out-of-home care in Victoria: Strengthening support services for dual clients of child protection and youth justice. Australian Social Work, 67(1), 6–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. R., Stein, M., & Ward, H. (2005). Comparing how different social, political and legal frameworks support or inhibit transitions from public care to independence in Europe, Israel, Canada and the United States. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, 8(4), 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, P. (2009). The risk factors prevention paradigm and the causes of youth crime: A deceptively useful analysis? Youth Justice, 9(2), 99–114.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Phoenix, J., & Kelly, L. (2013). You have to do it yourself’ responsibilization in youth justice and young people’s situated knowledge of youth justice practice. British Journal of Criminology, 53(3), 419–437.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J. P., & Testa, M. F. (2005). Child maltreatment and juvenile delinquency. Investigating the role of placement and placement instability. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(3), 227–249.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sallnas, M., Vinnerljung, B., & Westermark, P. K. (2004). Breakdown of teenage placements in Swedish residential and foster care. Child and Family Social Work, 9(2), 141–152.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1990). Crime and deviance over the life course: The salience of adult social bonds. American Sociological Review, 55, 609–627.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, G., Ward, E., Biggart, L., Scaife, V., Dodsworth, J., Larsson, B., et al. (2012). Looked after children and offending: Reducing risk and promoting resilience. Norwich: University of East Anglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, G., Biggart, L., Ward, E., & Larsson, B. (2015). Looked after children and offending: An exploration of risk, resilience and the role of social cognition. Children and Youth Services Review, 51, 125–133.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, J. (2014). Why do young people offend in children’s homes? Research, theory and practice. British Journal of Social Work, 44(7), 1823–1839.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C., & Thornberry, T. (1995). The relationship between childhood maltreatment and adolescent involvement in delinquency. Criminology, 33(4), 451–481.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. (2006a). Research review: Young people leaving care. Child and Family Social Work, 11(3), 273–279.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. (2006b). Young people ageing out of care: The poverty of theory. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(4), 422–434.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. (2014). Young people’s transitions from care to adulthood in European and Postcommunist Eastern European and Central Asian Societies. Australian Social Work, 67(1), 24–38.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M., & Munro, E. (2008). Young people’s transitions from care to adulthood: International research and practice. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A., Livingston, M., & Dennison, S. (2008). Transitions and turning points: Examining the links between child maltreatment and juvenile offending. Child Abuse and Neglect, 32(1), 51–66.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2006). Young people in care and criminal behaviour. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, R., Bell, R., Holland, J., Henderson, S., McGrellis, S., & Sharpe, S. (2002). Critical moments: Choice, chance and opportunity in young people’s narratives of transitions. Sociology, 36(2), 335–354.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull, V., & Spence, J. (2011). What’s at risk? The proliferation of risk across child and youth policy in England. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(8), 939–959.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, M. G., Shook, J. J., & McMillen, J. C. (2008). Aging out of foster care and legal involvement: Toward a typology of risk. Social Service Review, 82(3), 419–446.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vinnerljung, B., Sallnas, M., & Berlin, M. (2014). Placement breakdowns in long-term foster care – A regional Swedish study. Child and Family Social Work, (pp. 1–11). doi:10.1111/cfs.12189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, B. (2012). The relational context of desistance: Some implications and opportunities for social policy. Social Policy and Administration, 46(4), 395–412.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Youth Justice Review Team (2011). A review of the youth justice system in Northern Ireland. Belfast: Youth Justice Unit, Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Sociology, Social Policy and Social Work, Belfast, UK

    Nicola Carr & Siobhán McAlister

Authors
  1. Nicola Carr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Siobhán McAlister
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Monash University, Victoria, Australia

    Philip Mendes

  2. Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Australia

    Pamela Snow

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Carr, N., McAlister, S. (2016). The Double-Bind: Looked After Children, Care Leavers and Criminal Justice. In: Mendes, P., Snow, P. (eds) Young People Transitioning from Out-of-Home Care. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55639-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55639-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-55638-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55639-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)