Skip to main content

Decarbonizing Transport: What Role for Biofuels?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Handbooks in IPE ((PHIPE))

  • 3357 Accesses

Abstract

Oil continues to power the world transport system. While other major consumers, such as electric power generation, tap a diverse range of primary energy sources, some of them renewable, there are as yet no widely accepted substitutes for petroleum in transportation. Currently produced biofuels are imperfect substitutes, and expanded production has led to growing concern over land use, environmental damage, and competition with food supplies. It remains far from certain that advanced biofuels made from non-food biomass, such as agricultural residues or genetically engineered algae, will prove sustainable once full account has been taken of all impacts. Much more innovation will be needed, and success cannot be guaranteed. Policymakers need, quite urgently, better understanding of long-term prospects for sustainable biofuels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alic, J. A. (2013). The rightful place of science: Biofuels. Tempe, AZ /Washington, DC: Consortium for Science, Policy and Outcomes.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Alic, J. A. (2015). Biofuel battles: Politics, policy, and the pentagon. Energy Research & Social Science, 10, 10–18. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2015.06.006tles.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berck, P., & Hoffmann, S. (2002). Assessing the employment effects of environmental and natural resource policy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 22, 133–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O. J., & Gali, J. (2007). The macroeconomic effects of oil shocks: Why are the 2000s so different from the 1970s? (Working paper 13368). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blunden, J., & Arnd, D. S. (Eds.). (2015). State of the climate in 2014. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Special Supplement, 96(7), S1–S267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazzola, P., Morrison, G., Kaneko, H., Cuenot, F., Ghandi, A., & Fulton, L. (2013). Production costs of alternative transportation fuels. Paris: International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBO. (2014). The renewable fuel standard: Issues for 2014 and beyond. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. (2015, June 11). Oil price fall and limits on use of crops hits biofuels industry. Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damaso, M. C. T., Machado, C. M. M., de Sousa Rodrigues, D., Belem, S. G., & Salum, T. F. C. (2014). Bioprocesses for biofuels: An overview of the Brazilian case. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 1(6), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. C., Anderson-Teixeira, K. J., & DeLucia, E. H. (2009). Life-cycle analysis and the ecology of biofuels. Trends in Plant Science, 14(3), 140–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Energy. (2015). Quadrennial technology review: An assessment of energy technologies and research opportunities. Washington, DC: Department of Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edenhofer, O., et al. (Eds.). (2014). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change—contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 603–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshout, P. M. F., van Zelm, R., Balkovic, J., Obersteiner, M., Schmid, E., Skalsky, R., van der Velde, M., & Huijbregts, M. A. J. (2015). Greenhouse-gas payback times for crop-based biofuels. Nature Climate Change, 5, 604–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU. (2003). Directive 2003/30/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 May 2003. Official Journal of the European Union, May 17, 42.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU. (2009). Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 23 April 2009. Official Journal of the European Union, June 6, L 140/18.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1997, November 26). Energy for the future: Renewable sources of energy: White paper for a community strategy and action plan, COM(97)599. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2014). Progress towards achieving the Kyoto and EU 2020 objectives. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkbeiner, M. (2013, March 29). Indirect land use change (iLUC) within life cycle assessment (LCA) – Scientific robustness and consistency with international standards. Berlin: Verband der Deutschen Biokraftstoffindustrie e. V. and Verband der ölsaatenverarbeitenden Industrie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldemberg, J., & Horta Nogueira, L. A. (2014). Sweetening the biofuel sector: The history of sugarcane ethanol in Brazil. Bioenergy Connection, Fall, online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Printing Office. (2006). Weekly compilation of presidential documents. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 42, No. 5, February 6, 145–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff Zivin, J. S., Kotchen, M. J., & Mansur, E. T. (2014). Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of marginal emissions: Implications for electric cars and other electricity-shifting policies. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 107(Part A), 248–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinzerling, L. (2014). Inside EPA: A former insider’s reflections on the relationship between the Obama EPA and the Obama White House. Pace Environmental Law Review, 31, 325–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, S. P., Hughes, J. E., Knittel, C. R., & Parker, N. C. (2011). Some inconvenient truths about climate change policy: The distribution impacts of transportation policies (Working paper 17386). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2015). Medium-term oil market report 2015: Executive summary. Paris: IEA/OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Council for Clean Transportation. (2013). European vehicle market statistics pocketbook 2013. Berlin: International Council for Clean Transportation.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Transport Forum. (2007). Biofuels: Linking support to performance: Summary and conclusions, Joint Transport Research Centre 7–8 June 2007 round table. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. A., Runge, C. F., Senauer, B., Foley, J., & Polasky, S. (2014). Global agriculture and carbon trade-offs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 111, 12342–12347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilian, L. (2008). The economic effects of energy price shocks. Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 871–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, S. (2013). Fuelling global production networks with slave labour? Migrant sugar cane workers in the Brazilian ethanol GPN. Geoforum, 44, 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes Souza, G., Victoria, R. L., Joly, C. A., & Verdade, L. M. (Eds.). (2015). Bioenergy & sustainability: Bridging the gaps (p. 495). São Paulo: Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D., Mytelka, L., Press, R., Dall’Oglio, E. L., de Sousa, P. T., Jr., & Grubler, A. (2013). Brazilian ethanol: Unpacking a success story of energy technology innovation. In A. Grubler & C. Wilson (Eds.), Energy technology innovation: Learning from historical successes and failures (pp. 275–291). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). Sustainable development of algal biofuels in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2015). Climate intervention: Reflecting sunlight to cool earth. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nykvist, B., & Nilsson, M. (2015). Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles. Nature Climate Change, 5, 329–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OICA [International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers]. (2015). http://www.oica.net/

  • Olsen, J. P. (1991). Political science and organization theory: Parallel agendas but mutual disregard. In R. M. Czada & A. Windhoff-Héritier (Eds.), Political choice: Institutions, rules, and the limits of rationality. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag; quotation on 92, 87–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, R. S. (2015). The use and misuse of models for climate policy (Working paper 21097). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouliot, S., & Babcock, B. A. (2014). The demand for E85: Geographical location and retail capacity constraints. Energy Economics, 45, 134–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • REN21. (2014). The first decade: 2004–2014: 10 Years of renewable energy progress. Paris: Renewable Energy Policy Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • REN21. (2015). Renewables 2015 global status report. Paris: Renewable Energy Policy Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society. (2008). Sustainable biofuels: Prospects and challenges. London: Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, S., & Thoumi, F. E. (1986). From import substitution to exports: The manufacturing exports experience of Argentina and Brazil. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 34, 455–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2009). Assessing biofuels (p. 17). Paris: United Nations Environmental Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2015). Global trends in renewable energy investment 2015. Frankfurt: Frankfurt School of Finance & Management and Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velders, G. J. M., Andersen, S. O., Daniel, J. S., Fahey, D. W., & McFarland, M. (2007). The importance of the Montreal protocol in protecting climate. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 104, 4814–4819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. L. (2009). On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, B. (2014). Global biofuels: Key to the puzzle of grain market behavior. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(1), 73–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yacobucci, B. D. (2012, January 11). Biofuels incentives: A summary of federal programs (R40110). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alic, J.A. (2016). Decarbonizing Transport: What Role for Biofuels?. In: Van de Graaf, T., Sovacool, B., Ghosh, A., Kern, F., Klare, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the International Political Economy of Energy. Palgrave Handbooks in IPE. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55631-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics