Abstract
This chapter discusses the social and spatial changes in the city of Amsterdam from the early 1980s until 2015. It does so along three dimensions: social class, ethnicity and demography. The socio-spatial transformation of Amsterdam in those decades has been substantial and is characterised by an ever stronger concentration of highly educated and more recently also more affluent households. Furthermore, the city is increasingly ethnically diverse, but also socio-economically polarized. High-skilled migration from happens alongside lower-skilled labour migration. These processes have resulted in a gradual expansion of gentrification processes over in the pre-war city that are increasingly fuelled by international migration, leading to a spatial polarization with the peripheral post-war neighbourhoods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the Dutch ethno-national classification, ‘native-Dutch’ refers to a person whose parents were both born in the Netherlands. When one or both parents were born abroad, a person is classified as ‘non-native’. In this book, we prefer to use ‘Dutch from a migration background’ as much as possible. In the Dutch ethno-national classification, a distinction is also made between “non-natives” who are either ‘Western’ or ‘non-Western’. ‘Western’ encompasses North America, Europe (excluding Turkey but including the countries of the former Soviet Union), Oceania, Japan, and Indonesia; ‘non-Western’ the rest.
- 2.
OIS annual reports.
- 3.
Workforce is here defined as ‘beroepsbevolking’, which includes the population aged 15–64 that are employed or unemployed (total of 329,000 in 1995 and 461,000 in 2015).
- 4.
Before the adoption of the Bologna Accord for higher education, four or five year university programme graduates were awarded a doctorandus title. The proliferation of the new professional middle class in the service economy and in public administration led to a slight devaluation of the degree and to the term (and its diminutive) sometimes taking on a mocking connotation in Dutch.
Bibliography
Data Sources
Aalbers, M. B. (2011a). Place, exclusion and mortgage markets. Wiley-Blackwell.
Aalbers, M. B. (2011b). The revanchist renewal of yesterday’s city of tomorrow. Antipode, 43(5), 1696–1724.
Aalbers, M. B., & Deurloo, R. (2003). Concentrated and condemned? Residential patterns of immigrants from industrial and non-industrial countries in Amsterdam. Housing, Theory and Society, 20(4), 197–208.
Aalbers, M. B., van Gent, W. P. C., & Pinkster, F. M. (2011). Comparing deconcentrating poverty policies in the United States and the Netherlands: A critical reply to Stal and Zuberi. Cities, 28(3), 260–264.
Blom, H., Wertheim, D. J., van den Berg, H., & Wallet, B. (Eds.). (2017). Geschiedenis van de Joden in Nederland. Uitgeverij Balans.
Booi, H., & Boterman, W. R. (2020). Changing patterns in residential preferences for urban or suburban living of city dwellers. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 35(1), 93–123.
Boterman, W. R., & Bridge, G. (2015). Gender, class and space in the field of parenthood: Comparing middle-class fractions in Amsterdam and London. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40(2), 249–261.
Boterman, W. R., & Karsten, L. (2014). On the spatial dimension of the gender division of paid work in two-parent families: The case of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 105(1), 107–116.
Boterman, W. R., & Van Gent, W. P. C. (2014). Housing liberalisation and gentrification: The social effects of tenure conversions in Amsterdam. Tijdschrift voo rEconomische en Sociale Geografie, 105(2), 140–160.
Boterman, W. R., Manting, D., & Musterd, S. (2018). Understanding the social geographies of urban regions through the socio-economic and cultural dimension of class. Population, Space and Place, 24(5), e2130.
Boterman, W. R., Musterd, S., & Manting, D. (2021). Multiple dimensions of residential segregation. The case of the metropolitan area of Amsterdam. Urban Geography, 42(4), 481–506.
Buitelaar, E., Weterings, A. B., Raspe, O., Jonkeren, O., & Boterman, W. R. (2016). De verdeelde triomf: Verkenning van stedelijk-economische ongelijkheid en opties voor beleid: Ruimtelijke Verkenningen 2016. Planbureau voor de Leefomgevng.
Burgers, J. (1996). No polarisation in Dutch cities? Inequality in a corporatist country. Urban Studies, 33(1), 99–105.
Burgers, J., & Musterd, S. (2002). Understanding urban inequality: A model based on existing theories and an empirical illustration. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(2), 403–413.
Cortie, C., & Van de Ven, J. (1981). Gentrification–keert de woonelite terug naar de stad. Geografisch Tijdschrift, 15(5), 404–422.
Cortie, C., Van de Ven, J., & De Wijs-Mulkens, E. (1982). Gentrification in de Jordaan. De opkomst van een nieuwe binnenstadselite. Geografisch Tijdschrift, 16(4), 352–379.
Cortie, C., Van Engelsdorp Gastelaars, R., Terhorst, P., & Van de Ven, J. (1984). Nieuwe bewoners in de binnenstad van Amsterdam. Instituut voor Sociale Geografie.
Crul, M., & Schneider, J. (2010). Comparative integration context theory: Participation and belonging in new diverse European cities. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33(7), 1249–1268.
De Wijs Mulkens, M. S. (1999). Wonen op stand: Lifestyles en landschappen van de culturele en economische elite. Het Spinhuis.
Doucet, B., Van Kempen, R., & Van Weesep, J. (2011). ‘We’re a rich city with poor people’: Municipal strategies of new-build gentrification in Rotterdam and Glasgow. Environment and Planning A, 43(6), 1438–1454.
Ehrenhalt, A. (2012). The great inversion and the future of the American city. Knopf.
Galesloot, H., & Alberts, K. A. (2007). Van oceaanstomers tot mammoettankers: Een eeuw scheepsbouw in Amsterdam-Noord. Stichting Historisch Centrum Amsterdam-Noord.
Hamnett, C. (1994a). Social polarisation in global cities: Theory and evidence. Urban Studies, 31(3), 40.
Hamnett, C. (1994b). Socio-economic change in London: Professionalization not polarization. Built Environment, 20(3), 192–203.
Het Parool. (1992, October 13). Nood grote steden. Het Parool.
Hewett, R. (2019). (Re)-migration: Indonesians of mixed descent and the journey ‘home’. Social Identities, 25(3), 360–375.
Hochstenbach, C. (2017). Inequality in the gentrifying European city. PhD dissertation, Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Hochstenbach, C., & Boterman, W. (2018). Age, life course and generations in gentrification processes. In L. Lees & M. Philips (Eds.), Handbook of gentrification studies (pp. 170–185). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Hochstenbach, C., & Musterd, S. (2018). Gentrification and the suburbanization of poverty: Changing urban geographies through boom and bust periods. Urban Geography, 39(1), 26–53.
Hochstenbach, C., Musterd, S., & Teernstra, A. (2015). Gentrification in Amsterdam: Assessing the importance of context. Population, Space and Place, 21(8), 754–770.
Hooijmeijer. (2015, May 12). “De stad als metafoor”, congres ‘De stad: Magneet, roltrap en spons.’
Jobse, R. B., & Needham, B. (1988). The economic future of the Randstad, Holland. Urban Studies, 25(4), 282–296.
Karsten, L. (2007). Housing as a way of life: Towards an understanding of middle-class families’ preference for an urban residential location. Housing Studies, 22(1), 83–98.
Kloosterman, R. C. (1994). Amsterdamned: The rise of unemployment in Amsterdam in the 1980s. Urban Studies, 31(8), 1325–1344.
Kloosterman, R. C. (1996). Double Dutch: Polarization trends in Amsterdam and Rotterdam after 1980. Regional Studies, 30(5), 467–476.
Kloosterman, R. C. (2014). From Amsterdamned to I Amsterdam: The Amsterdam economy and the Impact on the labormarket position of migrants, 1980–2010. In N. Foner, J. Rath, J. W. Duyvendak, & R. Van Reekum (Eds.), New York and Amsterdam: Immigration and the new urban landscape (pp. 107–131). NYU Press.
Kloosterman, R. C., & Musterd, S. (2001). The polycentric urban region: Towards a research agenda. Urban Studies, 38(4), 623–633.
Kruijt, B. (1983). De stedelijke inkomensontwikkeling: Een benauwend vooruitzicht. Economisch Statistische Berichten, 68, 856–859.
Lees, L. (2003). Super-gentrification: The case of Brooklyn heights, New York city. Urban Studies, 40(12), 2487–2509.
Lucassen, L., & Lucassen, J. (2021). Migratie als DNA van Amsterdam: 1550–2021. Atlas Contact.
Mamadouh, V. (1992). Three social movements in Amsterdam: Young households in the political arena between 1965 and 1985. In H. Van der Wusten (Ed.), The urban political arena (pp. 105–127). KNAG.
Meulenbelt, K. (1997). Van een één- naar een twee-toppige woningmarkt. De opkomst en neergang van woonbuurten in het Amsterdamse en Rotterdamse stadsgewest. AME.
Musterd, S. (1991). Neighborhood change in Amsterdam. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 82(1), 30–39.
Musterd, S., & De Pater, B. (1992). Randstad Holland: Internationaal, regionaal, lokaal. Van Gorcum.
Musterd, S., & Ostendorf, W. (1996). Ethnicity and the Dutch welfare state: The case of Amsterdam. In C. Roseman, H. D. Laux, & G. Thieme (Eds.), Ethni city. Geographicperspectives on ethnic change in modern cities (pp. 121–140). Rowman & Littlefield.
Musterd, S., & Ostendorf, W. (2003). Understanding segregation in the metropolitan area of Amsterdam. In S. Musterd & W. Salet (Eds.), Amsterdam human capital (pp. 181–198). Amsterdam University Press.
Musterd, S., Bontje, M., & Ostendorf, W. (2006). The changing role of old and new urban centers: The case of the Amsterdam region. Urban Geography, 27(4), 360–387.
Musterd, S., Hochstenbach, C., & Boterman, W. (2020). Ripples of structural economic transformation: The changing social geographies of Dutch metropolitan regions. Applied Geography, 116, 102151.
Nijman, J. (1999). Cultural globalization and the identity of place: The reconstruction of Amsterdam. Ecumene, 6(2), 146–164.
Nimako, K., & Willemsen, G. F. W. (2011). The Dutch Atlantic: Slavery, abolition and emancipation. Pluto Press.
NRC Handelsblad. (1984, June 20). Economische kracht uit handel, dienstverlening en innovatie geen stads is zo compleet als Amsterdam. NRC Handelsblad
NRC Handelsblad. (2003, February 27). Keerpunt in de WAO. NRC Handelsblad.
Oudhof, K., Harmsen, C., Loozen, S., & Choenn, C. (2008). Omvang en spreiding van Surinaamse bevolkingsgroepen in Nederland. CBS.
PBL. (2015). De stad: Magneet, roltrap en spons. Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving.
Pinkster, F. M., & Boterman, W. R. (2017). When the spell is broken: Gentrification, urban tourism and privileged discontent in the Amsterdam canal district. Cultural Geographies, 24(3), 457–472.
Pinkster, F. M., Ferier, M. S., & Hoekstra, M. S. (2020). On the stickiness of territorial stigma: Diverging experiences in Amsterdam’s most notorious neighbourhood. Antipode, 52(2), 522–541.
Price, M., & Benton-Short, L. (2007). Immigrants and world cities: From the hyper-diverse to the bypassed. GeoJournal, 68(2-3), 103.
Roosblad, J. (2002). Vakbonden en immigranten in Nederland (1960–1997). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Schmal, H. (2003). The historical roots of the daily urban system. In W. Salet & S. Musterd (Eds.), Amsterdam human capital (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam University Press.
Sleutjes, B., & Boterman, W. R. (2016). Stated residential preferences of highly skilled international migrants. In S. Musterd, M. Bontje, & J. Rouwendaal (Eds.), Skills and cities (pp. 169–193). Routledge.
Terhorst, P., & Van De Ven, J. (1995). The national urban growth coalition in The Netherlands. Political Geography, 14(4), 343–361.
Terhorst, P., & van de Ven, J. (2003). The economic restructuring of the historic city center. In S. Musterd & W. Salet (Eds.), Amsterdam human capital (pp. 85–104). Amsterdam University Press.
Trouw. (2007, August 22). Amsterdam stad met meeste nationaliteiten (177) ter wereld. Trouw.
Tzaninis, Y. (2016). Building utopias on sand, the production of space in Almere and the future of suburbia. Doctoral thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Uitermark, J. (2009). An in memoriam for the just city of Amsterdam. City, 13(2-3), 347–361.
Uitermark, J., & Bosker, T. (2014). Wither the ‘undivided city’? An assessment of state-sponsored gentrification in Amsterdam. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 105(2), 221–230.
Van Gent, W., & Hochstenbach, C. (2020a). The impact of gentrification on social and ethnic segregation. In S. InMusterd (Ed.), Handbook on urban segregation (pp. 306–324). Edward Elgar.
Van Gent, W., & Musterd, S. (2016). Class, migrants, and the European city: Spatial impacts of structural changes in early twenty-first century Amsterdam. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(6), 893–912.
Van Gent, W., Das, M., & Musterd, S. (2019a). Sociocultural, economic and ethnic homogeneity in residential mobility and spatial sorting among couples. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(4), 891–912.
Verlaan, T. (2017). De Ruimtemakers. Projectontwikkelaars en de Nederlandse binnenstad1950-1980. Vantilt.
Verlaan, T., & Albers, A. (2022). From Hippies to yuppies marginal gentrification in Amsterdam’s Jordaan and De Pijp neighbourhoods 1960-1990. City, 26(2-3), 496–518.
Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 1024–1054.
Vijgen, J., & van Engelsdorp Gastelaars, R. E. (1986). Stedelijke bevolkingskategorieën in opkomst: Stijlen en strategieën in het alledaags bestaan. Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap.
Wagenaar, M. (2003). Bourgeois-boheme. Gentrification in de Oude Pijp in Amsterdam. In C. Cortie, J. Droogleever Fortuijn, & M. Wagenaar (Eds.), Stad en land, over bewoners en woonmilieus (pp. 224–243). Aksant.
Bureau van Statistiek (OIS). (1962). Kwartaalberichten van de gemeente Amsterdam. Bureau van Statistiek der Gemeente Amsterdam.
Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek (CBS). (2022). Statline, open data via opendata.cbs.nl
EVMRA. (2016). Economische Verkenningen Metropoolregio Amsterdam. EVMRA.
Onderzoek en Statistiek. (1997). Amsterdam in Cijfers, Jaarboek 1997. Onderzoek en Statistiek gemeente Amsterdam.
Onderzoek Informatie en Statistiek. (2016a). Amsterdam in Cijfers, Jaarboek 2016. Onderzoek en Statistiek gemeente Amsterdam.
Onderzoek Informatie en Statistiek. (2016b). Metropoolregio Amsterdam in Cijfers 2016. Onderzoek, Informatie en Statistiek gemeente Amsterdam.
Onderzoek Informatie en Statistiek. (2020). Factsheet flexibele schil in Amsterdam. Onderzoek, Informatie en Statistiek gemeente Amsterdam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boterman, W., Gent, W.v. (2023). Social and Spatial Transformations. In: Making the Middle-class City. The Contemporary City. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55493-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55493-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-57494-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-55493-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)