Advertisement

Domesticating Drone Technologies: Commercialisation, Banalisation, and Reconfiguring ‘Ways of Seeing’

  • Caitlin Overington
  • Thao Phan
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the tensions in transition as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (commonly known as drones) cross over from military contexts into urban city-spaces. Tracing the history of drones through stages of conflict, this chapter argues that the expanding use of drones into everyday life is demonstrative of broader trends in the banalisation of surveillance technologies. By engaging with Hardt and Negri’s concept of Empire, Arendt’s banalisation of violence, and Berger’s ‘ways of seeing’, we demonstrate via a comparative analysis with closed-circuit television how banal spaces may be co-opted using such technologies and how such a processes can be exploited in service of biopolitical ends.

Keywords

Crime Prevention Security Technology Global Order Federal Aviation Administration Security Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, J., & McAtamney, A. (2011). Considering local context when evaluating a closed circuit television system in public spaces. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 430(October), 1–10.Google Scholar
  2. Arendt, H. (1994). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  3. Associated Press. (2014). Half of US-Mexico border now patrolled only by drone. The Guardian, 13 November. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/13/half-us-mexico-border-patrolled-drone. Accessed 27 July 2015.
  4. Ball, K., Haggerty, K., & Lyon, D. (Eds.). (2012). Routledge handbook of surveillance studies. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  7. Bi, F. (2015). Drone sales soar past $16 million on eBay. Forbes Magazine, 28 January. http://www.forbes.com/sites/frankbi/2015/01/28/drone-sales-soar-past-16-million-on-ebay/. Accessed 29 Apr 2015.
  8. Boussios, E. (2015). Changing the rules of war: The controversies surrounding the United States’ expanded use of drones. Journal of Terrorism Research, 6(1), 43–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, B. (1995). CCTV in town centres: Three case studies. London: Home Office Police Department.Google Scholar
  10. Carr, R. (2014). CCTV installation for crime prevention, or “friends of the government”? The Saturday Paper, 2 August. https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/news/politics/2014/08/02/cctv-installation-crime-prevention-or-friends-the-government/1406901600. Accessed 2 Aug 2014.
  11. Coleman, R., & Sim, J. (2000). “You’ll never walk alone”: CCTV surveillance, order and neo-liberal rule in Liverpool city centre. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 623–639.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. de Goede, M. (2012). Speculative security. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doyle, A., Lippert, R., & Lyon, D. (2012). Eyes everywhere: The global growth of camera surveillance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Evans, R. (2015). “The footage is decisive”: Applying the thinking of Marshall McLuhan to CCTV and police misconduct. Surveillance & Society, 13(2), 218–232.Google Scholar
  16. Federal Aviation Administration. (2015). Petitioning for exemption under Section 333. https://www.faa.gov/uas/legislative_programs/section_333/how_to_file_a_petition/. Accessed 12 June 2015.
  17. Finn, J. (2012). Seeing surveillantly: Surveillance as social practice. In A. Doyle, R. Lippert, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Eyes everywhere: The global growth of camera surveillance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Fussey, P., & Coaffee, J. (2012). Urban spaces of surveillance. In K. Ball, K. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge handbook of surveillance studies. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Goold, B. (2004). CCTV and policing. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Goold, B., Loader, I., & Thumala, A. (2013). The banality of security: The curious case of surveillance cameras. British Journal of Criminology, 53(6), 977–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haggerty, K., & Ericson, R. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605–622.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hardt, M., & Negri, A. (2005). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  24. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Cornwall: T.J. Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lyon, D. (2004). Globalizing surveillance: Comparative and sociological perspectives. International Sociology, 19(2), 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyon, D., Doyle, A., & Lippert, R. (2012). Introduction. In A. Doyle, R. Lippert, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Eyes everywhere: The global growth of camera surveillance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. McCulloch, J., & Pickering, S. (2009). Pre-crime and counter-terrorism: Imagining future crime in the “war on terror”. British Journal of Criminology, 49(5), 628–645.Google Scholar
  28. Norris, C., & Armstrong, G. (1999). CCTV and the social structuring of surveillance. Crime Prevention Studies, 10(1), 157–178.Google Scholar
  29. Overington, C., & Phan, T. (2016). Happiness from the skies or a new death from above? #cokedrones in the city. Somatechnics, 6(1), 72–88.Google Scholar
  30. Pilkington, E. (2014). “We see ourselves as the vanguard”: The police force using drones to fight crime. The Guardian, 1 October. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/01/drones-police-force-crime-uavs-north-dakota. Accessed 12 June 2015.
  31. Popper, B. (2015). These are the first 500 companies allowed to fly drones over the US. The Verge, 7 July. http://www.theverge.com/2015/7/7/8883821/drone-search-engine-faa-approved-commercial-333-exemptions. Accessed 12 June 2015.
  32. Porter, G. (2009). CCTV images as evidence. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 41(1), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pugliese, J. (2013). State violence and the execution of Law: Biopolitcal caesurae of torture, black sites, drones. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Reeve, T. (2013). BSIA attempts to clarify question of how many CCTV cameras there are in the UK. Security News Desk, 11 July. http://www.securitynewsdesk.com/bsia-attempts-to-clarify-question-of-how-many-cctv-cameras-in-the-uk/. Accessed 12 June 2015.
  35. Whittaker, B., & Burkeman, O. (2002). The US accused of executing six alleged al-Qaida members. The Guardian, 6 November. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2002/nov/06/usa.alqaida. Accessed 29 Apr 2015.
  36. Williams, K., & Johnstone, C. (2000). The politics of the selective gaze: Closed circuit television and the policing of public space. Crime, Law & Social Change, 34(1), 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson, D., & Sutton, A. (2004). Watched over or over-watched? Open street CCTV in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 37(2), 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Young, A. (2014). Street art, public city: Law, crime and the urban imagination. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Zaloga, S. (2012). Unmanned aerial vehicles: Robotic air warfare 1917–2007. Oxford: Osprey Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caitlin Overington
    • 1
  • Thao Phan
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Culture and CommunicationUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.School of Social and Political SciencesUniversity of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations