Skip to main content

The United Nations in Development: Confronting Fragmentation?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 706 Accesses

Part of the book series: Rethinking International Development series ((RID))

Abstract

Quantitative measures of the United Nations’ engagement in development point toward a complex web of entities with many small interventions. The historical legacy of functionalism, a decentralized funding mechanism relying on earmarked funding, as well as incoherent governance by member states are main drivers of fragmentation. Common measures of the extent of fragmentation favour particular roles and activities that do not necessarily correspond to the multifaceted UN interventions centred on capacity building and policy advice. Whilst initiatives such as ‘Delivering as One’ have made some progress to curb fragmentation, there are concerns a fragmentation-centred reform agenda may not be sufficiently future-oriented. The paper suggests that the sustainable development agenda will be a fundamental impulse for change within the UN Development System, including for the fragmentation debate.

The views expressed by the author do not necessarily reflect the views of the United Nations and/or the United Nations Joint Inspection Unit. No unpublished or proprietary material of the United Nations was used for this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Biermann, F., P. Pattberg, F. Zelli, H. van Asselt, I. Boas, C. Flachsland, N. Goel, A. Hof, A. Jerneck, E. Massey, L. Olsson, and J. Stripple. 2009a. Global climate governance after 2012: Architecture, agency and adaptation. In Making climate change work for us, ed. M. Hulme and H. Neufeldt, 263–290. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., P. Pattberg, H. van Asselt, and F. Zelli. 2009b. The fragmentation of global governance architectures: A framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics 9(4): 14–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, S. 2011. The United Nations Development Programme and system. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, S., and T.G. Weiss. 2013. Is the UN development system becoming Irrelevant?. Development Dialogue Paper No.4. Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, S., and T.G. Weiss (eds.). 2014. Post-2015 UN development: Making change happen? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fomerand, J. 2003. Mirror, tool, or linchpin for change? The UN and development. Academic Council of the UN System (ACUNS), International Relations Studies and the UN Occasional Papers No 2. http://acuns.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/MirrorToolorLinchpinforChange.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr 2015.

  • Helgasson, K., and S. Weinlich. 2015. Post-2015: Recharging governance of United Nations Development. Briefing Paper 6/2015. German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. 1969. Study of the capacity of the UN development system. Geneva. United Nations

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks,B. 2013. UN development at a crossroads. Development Dialogue Paper Series No. 3. Uppsala: Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, B., and B. Jones. 2013. UN development at a crossroads. New York: NYU Center on International Cooperation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, R., L. Emmerij, and T.G. Weiss. 2009. UN ideas that changed the world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindores, D. 2012. Enhancing the functioning of the UN Resident Coordinator system. A Report prepared for the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, May 2012. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahn, T. 2012. The financing of development cooperation at the United Nations: Why more means less. DIE Briefing Paper 8/2012. Bonn: German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, J. 2006. The reform of the UN Economic and Social Council: A never-ending story?. Global Policy Forum. www.globalpolicy.org/social-and-economic-policy/social-and-economic-policy-at-the-un/reform-of-ecosoc-and-the-social-and-economic-policy-process-at-the-un/47509-the-reform-of-the-un-economic-and-social.html. Accessed 02 May 2015.

  • Mueller, J. 2010. UN system coordination: The challenge of working together. Journal of International Organization Studies 1/1, 29–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2011. Aid orphans: a collective responsibility? Improving identification and monitoring of under-aided countries (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Picciotto, R. 2014. The UN has lost the aid effectiveness race: What is to be done?. Future of the United Nations Development System (FUNDS) Briefing Paper 14. http://www.futureun.org/media/archive1/briefings/FUNDS_Brief14_Feb2014_D5.pdf. Accessed 25 Apr 2015.

  • Righter, R. 1995. Utopia lost. The UN and world order. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretary-General. 2006. Mandating and delivering: Analysis and recommendations to facilitate the review of mandates. Report of the Secretary-General, A/60/733, 30 March 2006. New York: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Secretariat (2014): Implementation of General Assembly resolution 67/226 on the quadrennial comprehensive policy review of operational activities for development of the United Nations system, A/69/63–E/2014/10, Statistical annex available at: www.un.org/en/development/desa/oesc/qcpr.shtm, February 2014.

  • Vatterodt, M. 2008. The implementation of the Paris Declaration on aid effectiveness by the UN: Progress to date and need for further reforms. Bonn: German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinlich, S. 2011. Reforming development cooperation at the United Nations: An analysis of policy position and actions of key states on reform options. Studies 59. Bonn: German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinlich, S. 2014a. Emerging powers at the UN: Ducking for cover? Third World Quarterly 35(10): 1829–1844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinlich, S. 2014b. Funding the UN system. In Post-2015 UN development: Making change happen? ed. S. Browne and T.G. Weiss, 75–94. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. 2009. What’s wrong with the UN and how to fix it. Cambridge Polity Press. Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mahn, T. (2016). The United Nations in Development: Confronting Fragmentation?. In: Klingebiel, S., Mahn, T., Negre, M. (eds) The Fragmentation of Aid. Rethinking International Development series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55357-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics