Advertisement

Public Administration in Europe North and South: Enduring Differences and New Cleavages?

Chapter

Abstract

North and South European governments and public administrations have been subjected to similar external stimuli, such as globalization and Europeanization, and managerial trends, such as the New Public Management approach. Yet, until the onset of the global financial crisis and later the Eurozone crisis, Southern public administrations differed a lot from their Northern counterparts in terms of relations between bureaucrats and politicians and organizational aspects. In the past there were long-time diverging trajectories, separating South from North European administrations. After 2008 the Southern ones tried to adapt to the pressures of the economic crisis, and a North–South convergence became more visible. However, despite such convergence, changes are evolving in parallel across different regions and no common model of public administration is in sight.

Keywords

North European Group South European States European Administration Napoleonic Model Sotiropoulos 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Afonso, A., Zartaloudis, S., & Papadopoulos, Y. (2015). How party linkages shape austerity politics: Clientelism and the fiscal adjustment in Greece and Portugal during Eurozone crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 22, 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beltran, M. (1988). Spain. In D. C. Rowat (Ed.), Public administration in developed democracies. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  3. Beltran, M. (1990). L’ administracion publica y los funcionarios. In S. Giner (Ed.), Espana: Sociedad y politica. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe, S.A.Google Scholar
  4. Cassesse, S. (1993a). Hypotheses about the Italian administrative system. West European Politics, 16, 316–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cassesse, S. (1993b). Le system administrative Italien ou l’ art de l’ arrangement. Revue Francaise d’ Administration Publique, 67, 335–339.Google Scholar
  6. Christopoulos, D. (1998). Clientelistic networks and local corruption: Evidence from Western Crete. South European Society and Politics, 3, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daalder, H. (1966). Parties, elites and political developments in Western Europe. In J. LaPalombara & M. Weiner (Eds.), Political parties and political development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Del Pino, E., & Pavolini, E. (2015). Decentralisation at a time of harsh austerity: Multilevel governance and the welfare state in Spain and Italy facing the crisis. European Journal of Social Security, 15, 246–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Della Cananea, G. (1997). The reform of finance and administration in Italy: Contrasting achievements. West European Politics, 20, 194–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diamandouros, N. P., & Gunther, R. (2001). Parties, politics and democracy in the new Southern Europe. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Featherstone, K., & Kazamias, A. (2001). Europeanization and the southern periphery. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  12. Foot, J. (2014). Modern Italy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Franchini, G. (1993). La reforme de l’ administration publique. Revue Francaise d’ Administration Publique, 67, 427–433.Google Scholar
  14. Galanti, M. T. (2011). Is Italian bureaucracy exceptional? Comparing the quality of Southern European public administrations. Bulletin of Italian Politics, 3, 5–33.Google Scholar
  15. Giner, S. (1986). Political economy, legitimation and the State in Southern Europe. In G. O’ Donnel, P. C. Schmitter, & L. Whitehead (Eds.), Transitions from authoritarian rule: Southern Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Graham, L. S. (2001). Institutionalizing democracy: Governance in Post-1974 Portugal. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of comparative and development administration. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  17. Kickert, W. (2008). Distinctiveness in the study of public management in Europe. In W. Kickert (Ed.), The Study of public management in Europe and the US. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Kickert, W. (2011). Introduction: Administrative reform in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain. Public Administration, 89(3), 721–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kopecky, P., Mair, P., & Spirova, M. (Eds.). (2012). Party patronage and party government in European democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lewanski, R. (2000). The development and current features of the Italian civil service. In H. A. G. M. Bekke & F. M. Van der Meer (Eds.), Civil service systems in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  21. Magone, J. S. (2003). The politics of Southern Europe: Integration into the European Union. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
  22. Malefakis, E. (1995). The Political and socioeconomic contours of Southern European history. In R. Gunther, P. N. Diamandouros, & H.-J. Puehle (Eds.), The politics of democratic consolidation: Southern Europe in comparative perspective. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Molina, I. (1999). Spain: Still the century of corporatism? In E. C. Page & V. Wright (Eds.), Bureaucratic elites in Western European states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Morlino, L. (1995). Political parties and democratic consolidation in Southern Europe. In R. Gunther, P. N. Diamandouros, & H.-J. Puehle (Eds.), The politics of democratic consolidation: Southern Europe in comparative perspective. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Morlino, L. (1998). Democracy between consolidation and crisis: Parties, groups, and citizens in Southern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. OECD. (2013). Government at a glance. Paris: OECD. Retrieved October, 2014, from http://www.oecd.org/gov/government-at-a-glance-information-by-country.htm.
  27. Ongaro, E. (2008). Introduction: The reform of public management in countries in the Napoleonic state tradition (France, Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain). International Journal of Public Sector Management (special issue), 21, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ongaro, E. (2009). Public management reform and modernization: Trajectories of administrative change in Italy, France, Greece, Portugal and Spain. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Painter, M., & Peters, B. G. (2010). Administrative traditions in comparative perspective: Families, groups and hybrids. In M. Painter & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Tradition and public administration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Papacostas, A. (2001). Why there is no clientelism in Scandinavia? A comparison of the Swedish and Greek sequences of development. In S. Piattoni (Ed.), Clientelism, interests and democratic representation: The European experience in historical and comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Parrado, S. (2000). The development and current features of the Spanish civil service. In H. A. G. M. Bekke & F. M. Van der Meer (Eds.), Civil service systems in Western Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  32. Peters, G. B., & Pierre, J. (Eds.). (2004). Politicization of the civil service in comparative perspective: The quest for control. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. New public management, governance and the Neo-Weberian state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Raadschelders, J. C. N., Toonen, T. A. J., & Van der Meer, F. (2015). Civil service systems and the challenges of the 21st century. In F. Van der Meer, J. C. N. Raadshelders, & T. A. J. Toonen (Eds.), Comparative civil service systems in the 21st century. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  35. Sapelli, G. (1995). Southern Europe since 1945. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  36. Schneider, F., Buehn, A., & Montenegro, C.E. (2010). Shadow economies all over the world: New estimates for 162 countries from 1999 to 2007, World Bank (Policy Research Working Paper no. 5356). Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/3928/WPS5356.pdf?sequence=1, Accessed 16 February 2016.
  37. Shefter, M. (1994). Political parties and the state. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sotiropoulos, D. A. (1996). Populism and bureaucracy: Greece under PASOK rule. London: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  39. Sotiropoulos, D. A. (2004). South European public bureaucracies in comparative perspective. West European Politics, 27, 405–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sotiropoulos, D. A. (2006). Old problems and new challenges: The enduring and changing functions of Southern European state bureaucracies. In R. Gunther, P. N. Diamandouros, & D. A. Sotiropoulos (Eds.), Democracy and the state in the new Southern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sotiropoulos, D. A. (2015). South European governments and public bureaucracies in the context of the economic crisis. European Journal of Social Security, 15, 226–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spanou, C. (2008). State reform in Greece: responding to old and new challenges. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21, 15–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tilly, Ch. (1984). Big structures, large processes, huge comparisons. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  44. Van der Meer, F., & Dijkstra, G. S. A. (2011). Civil service systems in Western Europe: Variations and similarities. In F. Van der Meer (Ed.), Civil service systems in Western Europe (2nd ed.). Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Verhoest, K., Van Thiel, S., Bouckaert, G., & Laegreid, P. (2012). Government agencies: Practices and lessons from 30 countries. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National and Kapodistrian University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations