Skip to main content

The Transformative Effects of Transnational Administrative Coordination in the European Multi-level System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The chapter starts by identifying the drivers of entanglement between European (supranational) and national administrations. A lack of administrative capacities and implementation competences on the Commission’s side, and member states’ interests in implementation as well as the disaggregation of the nation-state foster the development of tight administrative networks. This development has implications for the national level, the European level and the interplay between the two. National administrations obtain a stronger role in European policy-making and adapt to some extent their organizational structure. European administrative structures are influenced by the bureaucratic interests of national administrative actors. An integrated perspective suggests that top-down and bottom-up processes drive each other: Europeanization strengthens national administrations, which in turn become more influential players on the European scene.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Bach, T., DeFrancesco, F., Maggetti, M., & Ruffing, E. (2016a). Symposium Transnational regulatory networks as means of EU governance: The administrative dimension of multilevel coordination. Public Administration, 94(1).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, T., DeFrancesco, F., Maggetti, M., & Ruffing, E. (2016b). Transnational bureaucratic politics: An institutional rivalry perspective on EU network governance. Public Administration, 94(1), 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, T., & Jann, W. (2010). Animals in the administrative zoo: Organizational change and agency autonomy in Germany. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(3), 443–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, T., & Ruffing, E. (2013). Networking for autonomy? National agencies in European networks. Public Administration, 91(3), 712–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bach, T., Ruffing, E., & Yesilkagit, K. (2015). The differential empowering effects of Europeanization on the autonomy of national agencies. Governance, 28(3), 285–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. (2015). European public administration as a multilevel administration: A conceptual framework. In M. Bauer & J. Trondal (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of the European administrative system (pp. 31–47). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. (2006). Policy-making and accountability in EU multilevel governance. In A. Benz & Y. Papadopoulos (Eds.), Governance and democracy. Comparing, national, European and international experiences (pp. 99–114). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blauberger, M., & Rittberger, B. (2015). Conceptualizing and theorizing EU regulatory networks. Regulation and Governance, 9(4), 367–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer S., & Burch M. (2005). The Europeanization of UK Government: From quiet revolution to explicit step-change? Public Administration, 83(4), 861–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busuioc, M. (2016). Friend or foe? Inter-agency cooperation, organizational reputation and turf. Public Administration, 94(1), 40–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busuioc, M., Groenleer, M., & Trondal, J. (2012). The agency phenomenon in the European Union. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2006). Autonomy and regulation. Coping with agencies in the modern state. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coen, D., & Thatcher, M. (2008). Network governance and multilevel delegation: European networks of regulatory agencies. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 49–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehousse, R. (1997). Regulation by networks in the European community: The role of European agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(2), 246–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein, B., & Grande, E. (2005). Beyond delegation: Transnational regulatory regimes and the EU regulatory state. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(1), 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein, M. B., & Newman, A. L. (2008). Escaping the international governance dilemma? Incorporated transgovernmental networks in the European Union. Governance, 21(1), 25–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2016). Register of commission expert groups and other similar entities. http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/. Accessed 23 Mar 2016.

  • Egeberg, M. (2006a). Europe’s executive branch of government in the melting pot: An overview. In M. Egeberg (Ed.), Multilevel union administration (pp. 1–16). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M. (Ed.). (2006b). Multilevel union administration. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M., Jarle, T., & Vestlund, N. M. (2015). The quest for order: Unravelling the relationship between the European Commission and European Union agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(5), 609–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg M., & Trondal, J. (2009). National agencies in the European administrative space: Government driven, commisson driven, or networked? Public Administration, 87(4), 779–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2015). Why strong coordination at one level of government is incompatible with strong coordination across levels (and how to live with it): The case of the European Union. Public Administration. doi:10.1111/padm.12236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grande, E., & McCowan, M. (2015). The two logics of multilevel administration in the EU. In M. Bauer & J. Trondal (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of the European administrative system (pp. 48–65). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Groenleer, M. (2014). Agency autonomy actually: Managerial strategies, legitimacy, and the early development of the European Union’s agencies for drug and food safety regulation. International Public Management Journal, 17(2), 255–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen, R. (1999). The Europeanization of national administrations: A comparative study of France and the Netherlands. Governance, 12(1), 81–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidbreder, E. (2014). Administrative capacities in the EU. Consequences of multi-level policy-making. In M. Lodge & K. Wegrich (Eds.), The problem-solving capacity of the modern state (pp. 218–237). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heims, E. (2015). Explaining coordination between national regulators in EU agencies: The role of formal and informal social organization. Public Administration. doi:10.1111/padm.12223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Héritier, A. (2001). Differential Europe: National administrative responses to community policy. In Transforming Europe. Europeanization and domestic change (pp. 44–59).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, H. (2009). Composite decision making procedures in EU administrative law. In H. Hofmann & A. Türk (Eds.), Legal challenges in EU administrative law. Towards an integrated administration (pp. 136–167). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2010). Types of multi-level governance. In H. Enderlein, S. Walti, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on multi-level governance (pp. 17–31). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H. (2003). Meeting the demands of EU membership: The Europeanization of national administrative systems. In K. Featherstone & C. Radaelli (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 83–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H., Peterson, J., Bauer, M. W., Connolly, S., Dehousse, R., Hooghe, L., et al. (2013). The European Commission of the twenty-first century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H., & Wright, K. (2009). Bringing regulatory processes back in: The reform of EU antitrust and merger control. West European Politics, 32(4), 738–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelemen, D. R., & Tarrant, A. D. (2011). The political foundations of the Eurocracy. West European Politics, 34(5), 922–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapohl, S. (2008). Risk regulation in the single market. The governance of pharmaceuticals and foodstuff in the European Union. Houndmills: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lægreid, P., Steinthorsson, R. S., & Thorhallsson, B. (2004). Europeanization of central government administration in the Nordic States. Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(2), 347–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffan, B., & O’Mahony, J. (2007). Managing Europe from an Irish perspective: Critical junctures and the increasing formalization of the core executive in Ireland. Public Administration, 85(1), 167–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, A., Pedersen, L. H., Sørensen, E. M., & Olsen, O. J. (2006). Independent regulatory authorities in European electricity markets. Energy Policy, 34(17), 2858–2870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Faur, D. (2011). Regulatory networks and regulatory agencification: Towards a single European regulatory space. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 810–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maggetti, M. (2014). The politics of network governance in Europe: The case of energy regulation. West European Politics, 37(3), 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maggetti, M., & Gilardi, F. (2011). The policy-making structure of European regulatory networks and the domestic adoption of standards. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 830–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, G. (2005). Dilemmas of European integration. The ambiguities and pitfalls of integration by stealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, M. (2012). Executive Power in the Making: The Establishment of the European Chemicals Agency. In M. Busuioc, M. Groenleer, & J. Trondal (Eds.), The agency phenomenon in the European Union. Emergence, institutionalization and everyday decision-making (pp. 42–62). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, M. (2008). Run-away bureaucracy? Exploring the role of Nordic regulatory agencies in the European Union. Scandinavian Political Studies, 31(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastenbroek, E., & Princen, S. (2010). Time for EU matters: The Europeanization of Dutch central government. Public Administration, 88(1), 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, E. (2016). When Europeanization feeds back into EU governance: EU legislation national regulatory agencies, and EU regulatory networks. Public Administration, 94(1), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer-Sahling, J.-H., & Van Stolk, C. (2015). A case of partial convergence: The Europeanization of central government in Central and Eastern Europe. Public Administration, 93(1), 230–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, A. L. (2008). Building transnational civil liberties: Transgovernmental entrepreneurs and the European data privacy directive. International Organization, 62(1), 103–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. (2003). Towards a European administrative space? Journal of European Public Policy, 10(4), 506–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, B., & Wonka, A. (2015). EU Agencies. In J. J. Richardson (Ed.), European Union: Power and policy-making (pp. 233–258). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffing, E. (2011). Die europäische Wertpapierregulierung zwischen Input- und Output-Legitimität: Das Lamfalussy-Verfahren. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffing, E. (2014). How to become an independent agency: The creation of the German federal network agency. German Politics, 23(1–2), 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffing, E. (2015). Agencies between two worlds: Information asymmetries in multi-level policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(8), 1109–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruffing, E. (2017). Inside regulatory bureaucracy: When Europe hits home in pharmaceuticals and chemicals. Public Policy and Administration. 32(1), 3–23. doi:10.1177/0952076715616999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (2010). Multi-level Europe. In H. Enderlein, S. Walti, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on multi-level governance (pp. 66–79). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schout, A., Jordan, A., & Twena, M. (2010). From ‘old’ to ‘new’ governance in the EU: Explaining a diagnostic deficit. West European Politics, 33(1), 154–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, M. (2011). The creation of European regulatory agencies and its limits: A comparative analysis of European delegation. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 790–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, M. (2002). Delegation to independent agencies: Pressures functions and contextual mediation. West European Politics, 25(1), 125–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J. (2011). Domestic agencies in an emergent European executive order. Journal of European Integration, 33(1), 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J. (2007). The public administration turn in integration research. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(6), 960–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoest, K., Peters, G., Bouckaert, G., & Verschuere, B. (2004). The study of organisational autonomy: A conceptual review. Public Administration and Development, 24(2), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoest, K., van Thiel, S., Bouckaert, G., & Lægreid, P. (Eds.). (2012). Government agencies. Practices and lessons from 30 countries. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vestlund, N. M. (2015a). Exploring EU Commission-agency relationship: Partnership or parenthood? In M. Bauer & J. Trondal (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of the European administrative system (pp. 349–368). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vestlund, N. M. (2015b). Pooling administrative resources through EU regulatory networks. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilks, S. (2007). Agencies networks, discourses and the trajectory of European competition enforcement. European Competition Journal, 3(2), 437–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yesilkagit, K. (2011). Institutional compliance European networks of regulation and the bureaucratic autonomy of national regulatory authorities. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(7), 962–979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zubek, R., & Staronova, K. (2012). Organizing for EU implementation: The Europeanization of government ministries in Estonia Poland, and Slovenia. Public Administration, 90(4), 937–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Bach .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bach, T., Ruffing, E. (2018). The Transformative Effects of Transnational Administrative Coordination in the European Multi-level System. In: Ongaro, E., Van Thiel, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics