Skip to main content
Book cover

The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe pp 311–325Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Collaborative Governance and the Third Sector: Something Old, Something New

Abstract

The third sector is one of the main partners for European governments in policy development and implementation. However, the relationship has often been a delicate one, touching on issues of autonomy and legitimacy. In this chapter, we give an overview of different theoretical reasons for and types of collaboration between the third sector and the state. We also describe the different traditions of collaboration that have emerged across Europe. Finally, we discuss the risks associated with this kind of relationship.

Keywords

  • Collaborative Governance
  • Classical Public Administration
  • Public Service Delivery
  • Brandsen
  • Sector Organizations

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 16.1

References

  • Baring Foundation. (2013). Independence under threat: The voluntary sector in 2013. London: The Baring Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., Hindmoor, A., & Mols, F. (2010). Persuation and governance: A state-centric relational perspective. Public Administration, 88(3), 851–870.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Beller, A., & Haß, R. (2014). New challenges for the cooperation between civil society and the public sector—The Federal Volunteer Service in Germany. In T. Brandsen, W. Trommel, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Manufactured civil society: Practices, principles and effects (pp. 116–135). Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bode, I., & Brandsen, T. (2014). State—Third sector partnerships: A short overview of key issues in the debate: Introduction to the special issue on state—Third sector partnerships. Public Management Review, 16, 1055–1066.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2010). Governance without a state: Can it work? Regulation and Governance, 4, 113–134.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brandsen, T., & Pape, U. (2015). The Netherlands: The paradox of government non profit partnership. Voluntas, 26, 2267–2282.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2016). Distinguishing different types of co-production: A conceptual analysis based on the classical definitions. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 427–435.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brandsen, T., van de Donk, W., & Putters, K. (2005). Griffins or chameleons? Hybridity as a permanent and inevitable characteristic of the third sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 749–765.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brandsen, T., Trommel, W., & Verschuere, B. (2015). The state and the reconstruction of civil society. International Review of Administrative Sciences. Published on November 4. doi:10.1177/0020852315592467.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, J. (2002). Government-nonprofit partnership: A defining framework. Public Administration and Development, 22, 19–30.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, J., & Brinkerhoff, D. W. (2002). Government-nonprofit relations in comparative perspective: Evolution, themes and new directions. Public Administration & Development, 22, 3–18.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cornforth, C. H. (2015). Nonprofit-public collaborations: Understanding governance dynamic. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44, 775–795.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The New institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A. (2005). Mixed welfare systems and hybrid organizations: Changes in the governance and provision of social services. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 737–748.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A., & Laville, J. L. (2004). Defining the third sector in Europe. In A. Evers & J. L. Laville (Eds.), The third sector in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, J., Miller Johnston, K., & McTavish, D. (2012). Co-governance or meta bureaucracy: Perspectives of local governance “partnerships” in England and Scotland. Policy and Politics, 40, 405–422.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gazley, B. (2010). Linking collaborative capacity to performance measurement in government-nonprofit partnerships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39, 653–673.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, C. A. (2005). Understanding collaboration among nonprofit organizations: Combining resource dependency; institutional, and network perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34, 340–361.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, L. S., Smith, R., & Zimmer, A. (2012). At the eve of convergence? Transformations of social service provision in Denmark, Germany and the United States. Voluntas, 23, 458–501.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, C., & Lynn, L. E. (2003). Producing human services: Why do agencies collborate? Public Management Review, 5, 63–81.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (1996). Working together: Key themes in the management of the relationship between public and non-profit organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9, 5–17.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). Ambiguity, complexity and dynamics of membership of collaboration. Human Relations, 53, 771–806.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jenei, G., & Kuti, E. (2007). The third sector and civil society. In S. Osborne (Ed.), Third sector in Europe: Prospects and challenges (pp. 9–25). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2004). Multi-level governance and multi-level meta-governance. In I. Bache & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-level governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, K. (2015). Public governance: The government of non-state actors in “partnerships”. Public Money and Management, 35, 15–22.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Keast, R., & Mandell, M. (2012). The collaborative push: Moving beyond the rhetoric and gaining evidence. Journal of Managing Governance, 18, 9–28.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. (1981). Voluntary sector in the welfare state. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milbourne, L., & Cushman, M. (2013). From the third sector to the big society: How changing UK government policies have eroded third sector trust. Voluntas, 24, 485–508.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • O’Flynn, J. (2009). The cult of collaboration in public policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68, 112–116.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. (2009). Delivering public services: Are we asking the right questions? Public Money and Management, 29, 5–7.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. P. (Ed.). (2010) The new public governance? New perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., et al. (1981). Consumers as co-producers of public services: Some institutional and economic considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9, 1001–1011.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. NewYork: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (2000). Governance in public administration. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: Authority, steering and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (2011). The governance narrative: Key findings and lessons from the ESRC’s Whitehall Programme. In R. A. W. Rhodes (Ed.), Public administration 25 years of analysis and debate. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., & Sokolowski, S. W. (2016). Beyond nonprofits: Re-conceptualizing the third sector. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 27(4), 1515–1545.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., Haddock, M. A., & Tice, H. S. (2013). The state of global civil society and volunteering: Latest findings from the implementation of the UN nonprofit handbook. Baltimore, MA.: Johns Hopkins University Center for Civil Society Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelcher, C., Mathur, N., & Smith, M. (2005). The public governance of collaborative spaces: Discourse, design and democracy. Public Administration, 83, 573–596.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). Network governance and post-liberal democracy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27, 197–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowa, J. (2009). The collaboration decision in nonprofit organizations: Views from the front line. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 1003–1025.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1994). Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Partnership with the Non-Governmental Sector. Retrieved October 26, 2015, from UN programme of action. http://www.iisd.ca/cairo/program/p15001.html.

  • Van Eijk, C., & Steen, T. (2015). Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence. Retrieved October 27, 2015, from International Review of Administrative Sciences: www.ras.sagepub.com.

  • Wijkström, F., & Zimmer, A. (Eds.). (2011). Nordic civil society at the crossroads: Transforming the popular movement tradition. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, A. (1999). Corporatism revisited. The legacy of history and the German non-profit-sector. Voluntas, 10, 37–49.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Taco Brandsen

  2. University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, UK

    Karen Johnston

Authors
  1. Taco Brandsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karen Johnston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taco Brandsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department for Public Leadership and Social Enterprise—PulSE Faculty of Business and Law , The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kingdom

    Prof. Edoardo Ongaro

  2. Institute for Management Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Prof. Sandra Van Thiel

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brandsen, T., Johnston, K. (2018). Collaborative Governance and the Third Sector: Something Old, Something New. In: Ongaro, E., Van Thiel, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55269-3_16

Download citation