The Work of Imitation: Decadent Writing as Mimetic Labour

  • Matthew Potolsky
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Nineteenth-Century Writing and Culture book series (PNWC)

Abstract

This chapter argues for regarding decadent writing as a sophisticated rethinking of the longstanding refusal in Western thought to treat mimesis as a form of work. From Plato to nineteenth-century social theorists like Gabriel Tarde, imitation is either a kind of game or an unconscious process, more child’s play or biological twitch than reasoned craft. Decadent writers instead see mimesis as a means of production, a way of creating something new through the reuse of older cultural materials. They reflect on their reworking of the idea of mimesis by contrasting the practices of decadent aesthetics with those of factory labour. While writers like Huysmans and Wilde associate the latter with mere repetition—a mechanized variation of Plato’s dismissal of mimesis as a reproduction of what already exists—they connect the former with aristocratic traditions of skilled craft.

Keywords

Artifice Craft Decadence Imitation Joris-Karl Huysmans Labour Mimesis Oscar Wilde Plato 

Works Cited

  1. Aristotle. (1984) Complete Works, ed. Jonathan Barnes, 2 vols. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. ——— (1995) Poetics, trans. Stephen Halliwell. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Auerbach, Erich. (2003) Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, trans. W. Trask. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bagehot, Walter. (1999) Physics and Politics. Chicago, IL: Ivan R. Dee.Google Scholar
  5. Baudelaire, Charles. (1965) Art in Paris, 1845–1862, trans. Jonathan Mayne. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
  6. ——— (1976) Critique d’art. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  7. Bernheimer, Charles. (1993). ‘Fetishism and Decadence: Salome’s Severed Heads’, in Fetishism as Cultural Discourse, ed. Emily Apter and William Pietz. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 62–83.Google Scholar
  8. Cohn, Elisha. (2012) ‘Oscar Wilde’s Ghost: The Play of Imitation’, Victorian Studies, 54 (3): 474–85.Google Scholar
  9. Derrida, Jacques. (1981) ‘Economimesis’, trans. R. Klein. Diacritics, 11 (2): 2–25.Google Scholar
  10. Dickens, Charles. (1996) Bleak House. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  11. Diderot, Denis. (1994). Selected Writings on Art and Literature, trans. Geoffrey Bremner. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  12. Eliot, George. (1996) Adam Bede. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gautier, Théophile. (1847) ‘Du beau dans l’art’, Revue des Deux Mondes, 19: 887–908.Google Scholar
  14. Horace. (1972) ‘The Art of Poetry’, in Ancient Literary Criticism, ed. D. Russell and M. Winterbottom. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 279–91.Google Scholar
  15. Huysmans, Joris-Karl. (1977) À rebours. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  16. ——— (2003) Against Nature, trans. R. Baldick. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  17. Kant, Immanuel. (1987) Critique of Judgment, trans. Werner Pluhar. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
  18. Lacoue-Labarthe, Philippe. (1989) Typography, trans. Christopher Fynsk. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Macfarlane, Robert. (2007) Original Copy: Plagiarism and Originality in Nineteenth-Century Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Maxwell, Catherine. (2013) ‘Scents and Sensibility: The Fragrance of Decadence’, in Decadent Poetics: Literature and Form at the British Fin de Siècle, ed. J. Hall and A. Murray. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 201–25.Google Scholar
  21. Nordau, Max. (1968) Degeneration. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  22. Pater, Walter. (1986) ‘Style’, in Walter Pater: Three Major Texts, ed. William Buckler. New York: NYU Press, 393–413.Google Scholar
  23. Plato. (1991) Republic, trans. Allan Bloom. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  24. Seneca. (1920) Epistles 66–92, trans. Richard M. Gummere. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Sidney, Philip. (2002) An Apology for Poetry. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Spackman, Barbara. (1999) ‘Interversions’, in Perennial Decay: On the Aesthetics and Politics of Decadence, ed. Liz Constable, Dennis Denisoff, and Matthew Potolsky. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 35–49.Google Scholar
  27. Stendhal. (1953) Scarlet and Black. trans. M. Shaw. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  28. ——— (1972) Le Rouge et le Noir. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  29. Tarde, Gabriel. (1895) Les Lois d’imitation. Paris: Germer Baillière.Google Scholar
  30. ——— (1962) The Laws of Imitation, trans. Elsie Parsons. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  31. Vernant, Jean-Pierre. (1983) ‘Some Psychological Aspects of Work in Ancient Greece’, in Myth and Thought among the Greeks. London: Routledge, 271–8.Google Scholar
  32. Wilde, Oscar. (2007) ‘The Decay of Lying’, in Complete Works of Oscar Wilde, ed. Josephine Guy, vol. 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 73–103.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew Potolsky
    • 1
  1. 1.University of UtahSalt Lake CityUSA

Personalised recommendations