Beyond the Third Mission: Toward an Actor-Based Account of Universities’ Relationship with Society

  • Jana Bacevic
Part of the Palgrave Critical University Studies book series (PCU)


Recently, there has been an expansion of political narratives that seek to develop universities’ links with society, predicated on the idea that academia needs to abandon the proverbial ivory tower and become more engaged with its environment. This chapter discusses the following questions: What is it that academics do when they engage with their societies? What are the ideas, issues and constraints surrounding these forms of engagement? How do they reflect and/or reproduce the concepts of (academic) authority? Based on ethnographic fieldwork in the UK, I develop a critical investigation of how academics’ narratives and practices interact with the structural conditions of knowledge production, how they relate to the status and rewards associated with the academia, and how they (re)construct the boundaries and power relations between the university and society.


Knowledge Production Public Engagement High Education Policy Epistemic Community Epistemic Authority 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ahearn, L. (2001). Language and Agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baert, P. (2012). Positioning Theory and Intellectual Interventions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 42(3), 304–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ball, S., & Olmedo, A. (2013). Care of the Self, Resistance and Subjectivity Under Neoliberal Governmentalities. Critical Studies in Education, 54(1), 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (Eds.). (2007). The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Burawoy, M. (2005). The Critical Turn to Public Sociology. Critical Sociology, 31(3), 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Canaan, J., & Shumar, W. (Eds.). (2008). Structure and Agency in the Neoliberal University. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Couldry, N. (2010). Why Voice Matters: Culture and Politics After Neoliberalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Davis-Cross, M. (2013). Rethinking “Epistemic Communities” Twenty Years Later. Review of International Studies, 39(1), 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. E3M. (2012). European Indicators and Ranking Methodology for University Third Mission. Retrieved October 25, 2015, from
  10. European Commission (EC). (2003). The Role of Universities in the Europe of Knowledge. Retrieved October 25, 2015, from
  11. European Commission (EC). (2012). The Higher Education Modernisation Agenda. Retrieved October 25, 2015, from
  12. Eyal, G., & Bucholz, L. (2010). From the Sociology of Intellectuals to the Sociology of Interventions. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gill, R. (2009). Breaking the Silence: The Hidden Injuries of Neo-Liberal Academia. In R. Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process: Feminist Reflections. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Holmwood, J. (Ed.). (2011). A Manifesto for the Public University. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  16. Hylland-Eriksen, T. (2001). Tyranny of the Moment: Fast and Slow Time in the Information Age. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jessop, B. (2008). A Cultural Political Economy of Competitiveness and Its Implications for Higher Education. In B. Jessop, N. Fairclough, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Education and the Knowledge-based Economy in Europe. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Katz, C. (2013). Missing Subjects. Dialogues in Human Geography, 3, 30–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kehm, B. M., & Teichler, U. (Eds.). (2013). The Academic Profession in Europe: New Tasks and New Challenges. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Krčmarova, J. (2011). The Third Mission of Higher Education Institutions: Conceptual Framework and Application in the Czech Republic. European Journal of Higher Education, 1(4), 315–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lamont, M. (2009). How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the Third Mission of Universities: Toward a Renewed Categorization of University Activities? Higher Education Policy, 20, 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Leathwood, C., & Read, B. (2013). Research Policy and Academic Performativity: Compliance, Contestation and Complicity. Studies in Higher Education, 38(8), 1162–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marcus, G., & Fischer, M. J. (Eds.). (1999). Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Model in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mead, G. H. (1932). The Philosophy of the Present. LaSalle, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  27. Nedeva, M. (2007). New Tricks and Old Dogs? The Third Mission and the Re-production of the University. In R. Boden et al. (Eds.), Geographies of Knowledge, Geometries of Power: Higher Education in the 21st Century. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Olssen, M., & Peters, M. (2005). Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism. Journal of Education Policy, 20(3), 313–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Osborne, T. (2004). On Mediators: Intellectuals and the Ideas Trade in the Knowledge Society. Economy and Society, 33, 430–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peck, J. (2010). The Constructions of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rose, N. (1989). Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar
  32. Ruegg, W. (Ed.). (2004). A History of the University in Europe (Vol. III). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Santiago, R., & Carvalho, T. (2008). Academics in a New Work Environment: The Impact of New Public Management on Work Conditions. Higher Education Quarterly, 62, 204–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Shore, C., & Davidson, M. (2014). Beyond Collusion and Resistance: Academic–Management Relations Within the Neoliberal University. LATISS (Learning and Teaching in the Social Sciences), 7(1), 19–37.Google Scholar
  35. Shore, C., & McLauchlan, L. (2012). “Third Mission” Activities, Commercialisation and Academic Entrepreneurs. Social Anthropology, 20(3), 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shore, C., & Wright, S. (1999). Audit Culture and Anthropology: Neo-Liberalism in British Higher Education. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5, 557–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shore, C., & Wright, S. (2000). Coercive Accountability: The Rise of Audit Culture in Higher Education. In M. Strathern (Ed.), Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2000). The Neo-Liberal University. New Labor Forum, 6, 73–79.Google Scholar
  39. Viale, R., & Etzkovitz, H. (2010). The Capitalization of Knowledge: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vostal, F. (2016). Accelerating Academia: The Changing Structure of Academic Time. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wacquant, L. (2012). Three Steps to a Historical Anthropology of Actually Existing Neoliberalism. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, 20(1), 66–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Watermeyer, R. (2012a). From Engagement to Impact? Articulating the Public Value of Academic Research. Tertiary Education and Management, 18(2), 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Watermeyer, R. (2012b). Issues in the Articulation of “Impact”: UK Academics’ Response to “Impact” as a New Measure of Research Assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 39(2), 359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Whyte, W. (2015). Redbrick: A Social and Architectural History of Britain’s Civic Universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jana Bacevic
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations