Youth and Revolutionary Romanticism: Young Writers Within and Beyond the Literary Field

  • Kate Douglas
  • Anna Poletti
Part of the Studies in Childhood and Youth book series (SCY)


This chapter examines the role of generational logic in Pierre Bourdieu’s influential theory of the literary field. Through a close analysis of the role Bourdieu’s ascribes to “youth” in the struggle over value within the field, we critically situate the context in which individual young writers attempt to claim the status of “author.” Through an analysis of Dave Eggers’ bestselling memoir A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius, we demonstrate how young writers can explore the powerful association between young people and aesthetic innovation, and how such a tactic must also contend with the “low” status of memoir in the hierarchy of genres. The chapter concludes by considering how the stakes elucidated by Bourdieu apply differently to young artists whose race, class and gender make their claim to authorship and artistry more problematic, by considering the claim that memoir has been key to the wider recognition of the aesthetics of hip-hop.


Young People Cultural Capital Cultural Production Literary History Generational Logic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Works Cited

  1. Alanen, L 2011, ‘Generational order’ in The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies, eds. J Qvortrup, WA Corsaro & M-S Honig, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp. 159–174.Google Scholar
  2. Alanen, L, Brooker, L & Mayal, B 2015, ‘Introduction’ in Childhood with Bourdieu, Studies in Childhood and Youth, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldick, C 2008, ‘Romantic irony’ in The Oxford dictionary of literary terms. Oxford University Press. Available from: Oxford Reference. [16 October 2015].Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, L 2015, ‘The first-person industrial complex’, Slate, 14 September. Available from: [15 September 2015].
  5. Bourdieu, P 1996, The rules of art: genesis and structure of the literary field, trans. S Emmanuel, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  6. Boyd, T 1997, Am I black enough for you? Popular culture from the ‘hood and beyond. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis, Available from: Amazon Kindle. [11 December 2015].Google Scholar
  7. Buckingham, D 2006, ‘Is there a digital generation?’ in Digital generations: children, young people, and new media, eds. D Buckingham & R Willett, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  8. Charles, R 2000, ‘Very clever headline goes here: A heartbreaking work of staggering genius by Dave Eggers’, The Christian Science Monitor, 2 March. Available from: [14 October 2015].
  9. Christie, W 1999, ‘Romantic irony’ in An Oxford companion to the Romantic age, ed. I McCalman, J Mee, G Russell, C Tuite, K Fullagar, & P Hardy, Oxford University Press, Oxford. Available from: Oxford Reference. [16 October 2015].Google Scholar
  10. Clay, A 2001, ‘Keepin’ it real: black youth, hip-hop culture, and black identity’, American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 1346–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Couldry, N 2003, ‘Media meta-capital: extending the range of Bourdieu's field theory’, Theory and Society, vol. 32, no. 5/6, pp. 653–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Couser, GT 2012, Memoir: an introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deb, S & Holmes, A 2015, ‘What are the consequences of our cultural obsession with newness?’ Sunday Book Review, The New York Times, 14 July. Available from: [18 July 2015].
  14. Eggers, D 2001, A heartbreaking work of a staggering genius, Vintage, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Gates, HL Jr 1985, ‘Editor’s introduction: writing “race” and the difference it makes’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilmore, L 2001a, ‘Limit-cases: trauma, self-representation, and the jurisdictions of identity’, Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 128–139.Google Scholar
  17. Griffiths, P 1996, Youth and authority: formative experiences in England 1560–1640, Clarendon, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hesmondhalgh, D 2006, ‘Bourdieu, the media and cultural production’, Media, Culture and Society, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 211–231. Available from: Sage Publications Database. [8 June 2015].Google Scholar
  19. Jamison, L & Moser, B 2015, ‘Should there be a minimum age for writing a memoir?’ Sunday Book Review, The New York Times, 19 May. Available from: [20 May 2015].
  20. Jones, G 2009, Youth, Polity Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  21. Kakutani, M 2000, ‘ “A heartbreaking work…”: clever young man raises sweet little brother’, The New York Times, 1 February. Available from: [18 October 2015].
  22. Kakutani, M 2010, ‘Jay-Z deconstructs himself’, The New York Times, 22 November. Available from: [22 October 2015].
  23. Kelly, A 2010, ‘David Foster Wallace and the new sincerity in American fiction’ in Consider David Foster Wallace: critical essays, ed. D Hering, Sideshow Media Group, Los Angeles, pp. 131–146.Google Scholar
  24. Lahire, B 2015, ‘Literature is not just a battlefield’, New Literary History, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lesko, N & Talburt, S (eds.) 2012, Keywords in youth studies: tracing affects, movements and knowledges, Routledge, New York and London.Google Scholar
  26. Mannheim, K 1972, ‘The problem of generations’ in Essays on the sociology of knowledge, Routledge, London, pp. 276–322.Google Scholar
  27. Metcalf, J 2012, The culture and politics of contemporary street gang memoirs, University Press of Mississippi, Jackson, MS. Available from: Amazon Kindle. [12 July 2015]Google Scholar
  28. Moi, T 1991, ‘Appropriating Bourdieu: feminist theory and Pierre Bourdieu’s Sociology of culture’, New Literary History, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1017–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rak, J 2013, Boom! Manufacturing memoir for the popular market, Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo.Google Scholar
  30. Rak, J 2015, ‘Life writing versus automedia: The sims 3 game as a life lab’, Online Lives 2.0. eds. L McNeill & JD Zuern, special issue of Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 155–180.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, S & Watson, J 2001, ‘The rumpled bed of autobiography: extravagant lives, extravagant questions’, Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, S & Watson, J 2010, Reading autobiography: a guide for interpreting life narratives, Second Edition, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  33. Suleiman, SR 1990, Subversive intent: gender, politics and the avant-garde, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  34. Turnovsky, G 2003, ‘The enlightenment literary market: Rousseau, authorship, and the book trade’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 387–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Woodmansee, M 1984, ‘The genius and the copyright: economic and legal conditions of the emergence of the “author”’, The printed word in the eighteenth century, Special issue of Eighteenth-Century Studies, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 425–448. Available from: JSTOR. [2 May 2013].Google Scholar
  36. Woolf, V 2001, A room of one’s own and three guineas, Vintage, London.Google Scholar
  37. Wyn, J & White, R 1997, Rethinking youth, SAGE, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate Douglas
    • 1
  • Anna Poletti
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Monash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  3. 3.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtNetherlands

Personalised recommendations