Advertisement

Introduction

  • Kate Douglas
  • Anna Poletti
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Childhood and Youth book series (SCY)

Abstract

This chapter locates the study of youth life writing at the intersection of social sciences and the humanities. It argues that any attempt to account for the life writing practices of young people must draw on the insights and methodologies of youth studies and sociology and literary and cultural studies. This blending of methods and approaches is required if young people’s use of life writing as a discourse and a practice is to be recognised as an important act of self-representation and agency by subjects often marginalised from the fields of social and political power that is shaped by pre-existing cultural practices shaped by genre. We offer three examples of how attention to the social, political and cultural positioning of young people that has been closely studied in youth studies can be placed into a productive dialectic with attention to the textuality of young people’s autobiographical acts.

Keywords

Young People Young Woman Life Story Moral Panic Child Soldier 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Works Cited

  1. Abbott, C 2003, ‘Making connections: young people and the internet’ in Digital diversions: youth culture in the age of multimedia, ed. J Sefton-Green, Routledge, London, pp. 84–105.Google Scholar
  2. Archard, D 2004, Children’s rights and childhood, Psychology, London.Google Scholar
  3. Baraldi, C 2008, ‘Promoting self-expression in classroom interactions’, Childhood, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bashkirtseff, M 1997, Diary of Marie Bashkirtseff. Chronicle, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, A, Cieslik, M & Miles, S (eds) 2003, Researching youth, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Berlant, L 2008, The female complaint: the unfinished business of sentimentality in American culture, Duke University Press, Durham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berlant, L 2011, Cruel optimism, Duke University Press, Durham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Best, A (ed.) 2007, Representing youth: methodological issues in critical youth studies. New York University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P 1996, The rules of art: genesis and structure of the literary field, trans. S Emmanuel, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  10. boyd, d 2008, ‘Why youth <3 social network sites: the role of networked publics in teenaged social life’ in Youth, identity and digital media, ed. D Buckingham. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 119–142.Google Scholar
  11. Bruns, A 2008, Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond: from production to produsage, Peter Lang, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Buckingham, D 2003, ‘Living in a young country? Youthful creativity and cultural policy’ in Youth cultures: texts, images and identities, ed. K Mallan & S Pearce, Praeger, Westport, pp. 93–108.Google Scholar
  13. Buckingham, D 2006, ‘Is there a digital generation?’ in Digital generations: children, young people, and new media, eds. D Buckingham & R Willett, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
  14. Buckingham, D 2008, Youth, identity and digital media, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  15. Buckingham, D &Willett R (eds) 2006, Digital generations: children, young people and new media, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah.Google Scholar
  16. Butler, J 2005, Giving an account of oneself, Fordham University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cockburn, T 2012, Rethinking children’s citizenship, Palgrave, London.Google Scholar
  18. Couser, GT 2004, Vulnerable subjects: ethics and life writing, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  19. Couser, GT 2012, Memoir: an introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Douglas, K 2010, Contesting childhood: autobiography, trauma and memory, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  21. Eakin, PJ 1999, How our lives become stories: making lives, Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  22. Freedland, J 2013, ‘The selfie’s screaming narcissism masks an urge to connect’, The Guardian, 19 November. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/19/selfie-narcissism-oxford-dictionary-word. [13 December 2013].
  23. Gilmore, L 2001b, The limits of autobiography: trauma and testimony, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  24. Giroux, HA 2000, Stealing innocence: youth, corporate power, and the politics of culture, St Martin’s Press, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Giroux, HA 2009, Youth in a suspect society: democracy or disposability? Palgrave Macmillan, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haddon, L & Livingstone, S 2012, EU kids online: national perspectives, The EU Kids Online Network. Available from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/46878/. [2 October 2014].
  27. Hall, M 2013, ‘Family albums fade as the young put only themselves in picture’, The Telegraph, 17 June. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/news/10123875/Family-albums-fade-as-the-young-put-only-themselves-in-picture.html. [15 December 2013].
  28. Harrod, H 2009, ‘Flickr: the world’s photo album’, The Telegraph, 26 May. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/digital-media/8500577/Flickr-the-worlds-photo-album.html. [15 December 2013].
  29. Helgren, J & Vasconcellos, CA 2012, Girlhood: a global history, Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  30. Holloway, SL & Valentine, G 2003, Cyberkids: children in the information age, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  31. James, A 2011, ‘Agency’ in The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies, ed. J Qvortrup, WA Corsaro & M-S Honig, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp. 34–45.Google Scholar
  32. James, A & Christensen, P (eds) 2007, Research with children: perspectives and practices, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  33. James, A & James AL 2004, Constructing childhood: theory, policy and social practice, Palgrave, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. James, A. & Prout, A (eds) 1990/1997, Constructing and reconstructing childhood: contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood, Second Edition, Falmer, London.Google Scholar
  35. Jolly, M 2008, In love and struggle: letters in contemporary feminism, Colombia University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jones, G 2009, Youth, Polity Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  37. Jones, J 2013, ‘Don’t hate the woman behind the “world’s worst selfie”’, The Guardian, 6 December. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/dec/05/dont-hate-woman-worlds-worst-selfie-suicidal-figure-brooklyn-bridge. [15 December 2013].
  38. Kearney, MC 2006, Girls make media, Routledge, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Lejeune, P. 1989. On autobiography. Ed. Paul John Eakin. Trans. Katherine Leary. Minneapolis, The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  40. Lejeune, P 2009, On diary. Ed. JD Popkin & J Rak. Trans. K Durnin. University of Hawai’i Press, Mano’a.Google Scholar
  41. Liebel, M 2012, Children’s rights from below, Palgrave, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Livingstone, S 2008, ‘Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression’, New Media and Society, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 393–411.Google Scholar
  43. Losse, K 2013, ‘The return of the selfie’, The New Yorker, 5 June. Available from: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/elements/2013/06/the-return-of-the-selfie.html. [13 December 2013].
  44. Marshall, E 2006, ‘Borderline girlhoods: mental illness, adolescence, and femininity in Girl, interrupted’, The Lion and the Unicorn, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 117–133.Google Scholar
  45. McNeill, L 2012, ‘There is no ‘I’ in network: social networking sites and posthuman auto/biography’, Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Montgomery, KC 2007, Generation digital: politics, commerce, and childhood in the age of the internet, MIT Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  47. Morrison, A 2014, ‘Facebook and coaxed affordances’ in Identity technologies: constructing the self online, eds. A Poletti & J Rak, Wisconsin University Press, Madison, pp. 112–131.Google Scholar
  48. Murphy, M 2013, ‘Putting selfies under a feminist lens’, Straight, 3 April. Available from: http://www.straight.com/life/368086/putting-selfies-under-feminist-lens. [13 December 2013].
  49. Plummer, K 2001, Documents of life 2: an invitation to a critical humanism, SAGE, London. Available from EBSCOhost eBook Collection, [12 July 2015].Google Scholar
  50. Poletti, A 2005, ‘Self-publishing in the global and local: situating life writing in zines’, Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 183–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Poletti, A 2008, Intimate ephemera: reading young lives in Australian zine culture, Melbourne University Press, Carlton, Vic.Google Scholar
  52. Poletti, A 2011, ‘Coaxing an intimate public: life narrative in digital storytelling’, Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Qvortrup, J, Bardy, M, Sgritta, G & Wintersberger H (eds) 1994, Childhood matters: social theory, practice and politics, Avebury, Aldershot; European Centre, Vienna.Google Scholar
  54. Rak, J 2005, ‘The digital queer: weblogs and internet identity’, Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 166–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rak, J 2013, Boom! Manufacturing memoir for the popular market, Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo.Google Scholar
  56. Rak, J 2015, ‘Life writing versus automedia: The sims 3 game as a life lab’, Online Lives 2.0. eds. L McNeill & JD Zuern, special issue of Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 155–180.Google Scholar
  57. Savage, J 2007, Teenage: the creation of youth culture, Viking Adult, New York.Google Scholar
  58. Schechter, MG & Bochenek, M 2008, ‘Working to eliminate human rights abuses of children: a cross-national comparative study’, Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 579–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schneider, G 2005, The culture of epistolarity: vernacular letters and letter-writing in early modern England, 1500–1700, University of Delaware Press, Newark.Google Scholar
  60. Shade, LR 2007, ‘Contested spaces: protecting or inhibiting girls online?’ in Growing up online: young people and digital technologies, eds. S Weber & S Dixon, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 227–244.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, S & Watson, J (eds.) 1996, Getting a life: everyday uses of autobiography, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  62. Smith, S & Watson, J 2001, ‘The rumpled bed of autobiography: extravagant lives, extravagant questions’, Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smith, S & Watson, J 2010, Reading autobiography: a guide for interpreting life narratives, Second Edition, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  64. Stern, ST 2007, Instant identity: adolescent girls and the world of instant messaging, Peter Lang, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  65. Stern, S 2008, ‘Producing sites, exploring identities: youth online authorship’ in Youth, identity and digital media, ed. D Buckingham, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 95–117.Google Scholar
  66. Thomas, A 2007, Youth online: identity and literacy in the digital age, Peter Lang, New York.Google Scholar
  67. Weber, S & Mitchell, C 2008, ‘Imaging, keyboarding, and posting identities: young people and new Media technologies’ in Youth, identity and digital media, ed. D Buckingham. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 25–47.Google Scholar
  68. Whitlock, G 2007, Soft weapons: autobiography in transit, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wilson, S 2010, Personal effects: reading the ‘journal’ of Marie Bashkirtseff, Legenda, London.Google Scholar
  70. Wyn, J & White, R 1997, Rethinking youth, SAGE, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate Douglas
    • 1
  • Anna Poletti
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Monash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  3. 3.Utrecht UniversityUtrechtNetherlands

Personalised recommendations