Advertisement

Political Chaucer

  • William McClellan
Chapter
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)

Abstract

This book introduces a political approach to reading Chaucer, contending that key tales present an examination of the destructive effects of sovereign power on the human subject. After a brief discussion of the Clerk’s Tale and the Prioress’s Tale, the point is made that scholars have overlooked Chaucer’s scrutiny of this fundamental political relation. Drawing on Giorgio Agamben and Primo Levi, it is asserted that the Holocaust has ushered in a new ethics that affects our reading of traditional literature. Adapting Walter Benjamin’s concept of constellation, this chapter offers a new paradigm that helps us read these tales in a more proximate way, one that, while taking account of Chaucer’s historical context, abridges the distance between him and us and makes possible “reading-history-as-ethical-meditation.”

Keywords

Political approach to Chaucer Agamben’s political theory Primo Levi memoir Walter Benjamin constellation New reading paradigm History as ethical meditation 

Works Cited

  1. Aers, David. 1986. Chaucer. Atlantic Highlands: Humanities Press International.Google Scholar
  2. Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Agamben, Giorgio. 1999. Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive. Trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  4. Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. The Time That Remains: A Commentary on the Letter to the Romans. Trans. Patricia Dailey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Auerbach, Erich. 1984. Figura. In Scenes From the Drama of European Literature, 11–76. Trans. Ralph Manheim. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  6. Benjamin, Walter. 1969. Theses on the Philosophy of History. In Illuminations, ed. Hannah Arendt, Trans. Harry Zohn, 253–264. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  7. Benjamin, Walter. 2002. The Arcades Project. Trans. Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Besserman, Lawrence. 2001. Ideology, Antisemitism and Chaucer’s Prioress’s Tale. Chaucer Review 36: 48–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Calabrese, Michael A. 2002. Performing the Prioress: “Conscience” and Responsibility in Studies of Chaucer’s Prioress’s Tale. Texas Studies in Language and Literature 44: 66–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaucer, Geoffrey. 1987. The Riverside Chaucer. 3rd edition. ed. Larry Benson. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. ed. 2000. The Postcolonial Middle Ages. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  12. Delany, Sheila. 2002. Chaucer’s Prioress, the Jews and the Muslims. In Chaucer and the Jews: Sources, Contexts, Meanings, ed. Sheila Delany, 43–57. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Despres, Denise L. 1994. Cultic Anti-Judaism and Chaucer’s Litel Clergeon. Modern Philology 91: 413–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dinshaw, Carolyn. 1989. Chaucer’s Sexual Poetics. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fradenburg, Louise. 1989. Criticism, Anti-Semitism, and the Prioress’s Tale. Exemplaria 1: 69–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kruger, Steven F. 2006. The Spectral Jew: Conversion and Embodiment in Medieval Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lang, Berel. 2000. Holocaust Representation: Art Within the Limits of History and Ethics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lavezzo, Kathy. ed. 2004. Imagining a Medieval English Nation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. Levi, Primo. 1989. The Drowned and the Saved. Trans. Raymond Rosenthal. New York: Random House, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Levi, Primo. 1996. Survival in Auschwitz: The Nazi Assault on Humanity. Trans. Stuart Woolf. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  21. McClellan, William. 2005a. Full Pale Face’: Agamben’s Biopolitical Theory and the Sovereign Subject in Chaucer’s Clerk’s Tale. Exemplaria 17: 103–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McClellan, William. 2005b. Primo Levi, Giorgio Agamben, and the New Ethics of Reading. In The Legacy of Primo Levi, ed. Stanislao Pugliese, 147–152. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McClellan, William. 2011. Primo Levi and the History of Reception. In Answering Auschwitz: Primo Levi’s Science and Humanism After the Fall, ed. Stanislao Pugliese, 169–176. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nirenberg, David. 2013. AntiJudaism: The Western Tradition. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  25. Patterson, Lee. 1987. Negotiating the Past: The Historical Understanding of Medieval Literature. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  26. Patterson, Lee. 1991. Chaucer and the Subject of History. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rigby, Stephen H. 2009. Wisdom and Chivalry: Chaucer’s Knight’s Tale and Medieval Political Theory. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scanlon, Larry. 1994. Narrative, Authority, and Power: The Medieval Exemplum and the Chaucerian Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schechter, Frank I. 1913. The Rightlessness of Mediaeval English Jewry. The Jewish Quarterly Review, New Series 4: 121–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shoaf, R. Allen. 2001. Chaucer’s Body: The Anxiety of Circulation in the “Canterbury Tales.”. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
  31. Staley, Lynn. 1996. Chaucer and the Postures of Sanctity. In The Powers of the Holy: Religion, Politics and Gender in Late Medieval English Culture, ed. David Aers and Lynn Staley, 179–259. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Strohm, Paul. 1989. Social Chaucer. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Tomasch, Sylvia. 2002. Postcolonial Chaucer and the Virtual Jew. In Chaucer and the Jews: Sources, Contexts, Meanings, ed. Sheila Delany, 69–85. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Traverso, Enzo. 2003. The Origins of Nazi Violence. Trans. Janet Lloyd. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wallace, David. 1997. Chaucerian Polity: Absolutist Lineages and Associational Forms in England and Italy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • William McClellan
    • 1
  1. 1.Baruch College, City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations