Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies and Leadership as Experts by Experience’ Leadership: Learning Activism in Health and Social Care Education

  • Tillie Curran
  • Ruth Sayers
  • Barry Percy-Smith
Chapter

Abstract

People involved in disabled children’s childhood studies, and others who contribute their experience of using health and social care services, strongly object to being seen by professionals as ‘the problem’. In contrast Experts by Experience involved in a leadership project used strategies of mutual support towards change. We see learning activism as core to a professional practice that is also about change and explore critical pedagogy for students to directly experience such collaborative ways of working. The chapter begins and ends with reflections by the authors on sharing their personal and political concerns as part of collaborative learning encouraged by the opportunities to join and support the voices of disabled children and their families.

Keywords

Disabled children Experts by experience Critical pedagogy Activism Social work 

References

  1. Amsler, S. (2011). From ‘Therapeutic’ to Political Education: The Centrality of Affective Sensibility in Critical Pedagogy. Critical Studies in Education, 52(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BASW. (2012). The Code of Ethics for Social Work. http://cdn.basw.co.uk/upload/basw_112315-7.pdf
  3. Beckett, A. E. (2015). Anti-oppressive Pedagogy and Disability: Possibilities and Challenges. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 17(1), 76–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beresford, P., & Branfield, F. (2006). Developing Inclusive Partnerships: User-Defined Outcomes, Networking and Knowledge − A Case Study. Health & Social Care in the Community, 14(5), 436–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, J. (2001). The World Café: Living Knowledge Through Conversations that Matter. The Systems Thinker, 12(5), 1–5.Google Scholar
  6. Burman, E., Greenstein, A., & Kumar, M. (2015). Editorial: Frames and Debates for Disability, Childhood and the Global South: Introducing the Special Issue. Disability and the Global South, 2(2), 563–569.Google Scholar
  7. Burstow, B., LeFrancois, B. A., & Diamond, S. (Eds.). (2014). Psychiatry Disrupted: Theorizing Resistance and Crafting the (R)evolution. Quebec: MQUP.Google Scholar
  8. Chataika, T., & McKenzie, J. (2013). Considerations of an African Childhood Disability Studies. In T. Curran & K. Runswick-Cole (Eds.), Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: Critical Approaches in a Global Context (pp. 89–104). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Coles, B. (2015). A ‘Suitable Person’: An ‘Insider’ Perspective. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 135–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Curran, T. (1997). Power, Post Modernism and Participation: Mental Health Education. Social Work Education, 16(3), 21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Curran, T. (2010). Social Work and Disabled Children’s Childhoods: A Foucauldian Framework for Practice Transformation. British Journal of Social Work, 40(3), 806–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Curran, T., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2013). Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: Critical Approaches in a Global Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Curran, T., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: A Distinct Approach? Disability and Society, 29(10), 1617–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Curran, T., Sayers, R., & Percy-Smith, B. (2015). Leadership as Experts by Experience in Professional Education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 624–629. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalrymple, J., & Burke, B. (2006). Anti-oppressive Practice and the Law (2nd ed.). Open University Press. ISBN 9780335218011. Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/1458
  16. Friere, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.Google Scholar
  17. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Goffman, E. (1963). Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  19. Goodley, D. (2007). Towards Socially Just Pedagogies: Deleuzoguattarian Critical Disability Studies. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 11(3), 317–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gould, N. (2004). The Learning Organisation and Reflective Practice – The Emergence of a Concept. In N. Gould & M. Baldwin (Eds.), Social Work, Critical Reflection and the Learning Organisation (pp. 1–11). Hants: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  21. Grech, S. (2013). Disability, Childhood and Poverty: Critical Perspectives on Guatemala. In T. Curran & K. Runswick-Cole (Eds.), Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: Critical Approaches in a Global Context (pp. 89–104). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed Leadership as Unit of Analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 423–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition (J. Anderson, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kemmis, S. (2001). Exploring the Relevance of Critical Theory for Action Research: Emancipatory Action Research in the Footsteps of Jurgen Habermas. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (pp. 91–102). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Ladkin, D. (2008). Leading Beautifully: How Mastery, Congruence and Purpose Create the Aesthetic of Embodied Leadership Practice. The Leadership Quarterly, 19, 31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mills, C., & Fernando, S. (2014). Globalising Mental Health or Pathologising the Global South? Mapping the Ethics, Theory and Practice of Global Mental Health. Disability and the Global South, 1(2), 188–202.Google Scholar
  27. Office of the Children’s Commissioner. (2014). They Still Need to Listen More. In A Report About Disabled Children and Young People’s Rights in England. London: Office of the Children’s Commissioner.Google Scholar
  28. Oliver, M. (1991). The Politics of Disablement. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Percy-Smith, B., & Walsh, D. (2006). Improving Services for Children and Families: Listening and Learning, Report from a Systemic Action Inquiry Evaluation Process. Northampton: Children’s Fund Northamptonshire/SOLAR.Google Scholar
  30. Percy-Smith, B., & Weil, S. (2003). Practice-Based Research as Development: Innovation and Empowerment in Youth Intervention Initiatives Using Collaborative Action Inquiry. In A. Bennett (Ed.), Researching Youth. London: Palgrave Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Pilgrim, D. (2005). Protest and Co-option – The Voice of Mental Health Service Users. In A. Bell & P. Lindley (Eds.), Beyond the Water Towers: The Unfinished Revolution in Mental Health Services 1985–2005 (pp. 17–26). London: The Sainsbury Centre for Mental Health.Google Scholar
  32. Preston, S., & Aslett, J. (2014). Resisting Neoliberalism from Within the Academy: Subversion Through an Activist Pedagogy. Social Work Education: The International Journal, 33(4), 502–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Razack, N. (2009). Decolonizing the Pedagogy and Practice of International Social Work. International Social Work, 52(1), 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). The Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Saleebey, D. S., & Scanlon, E. (2005). Is a Critical Pedagogy for the Profession of Social Work Possible? Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 25(3–4), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. The College of Social Work. (2012). Professional Capabilities Framework. http://www.tcsw.org.uk/pcf.aspx. Accessed 10 Sept 2014.
  37. Thomas, N. (2012). Love, Rights and Solidarity: Studying Children’s Participation Using Honneth’s Theory of Recognition. Childhood, 19(4). http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0907568211434604
  38. Tremain, S. (2006). On the Government of Disability: Foucault, Power and the Subject of Impairment. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The Disability Studies Reader (2nd ed., pp. 185–197). New York/Abingdon: Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  39. Tremain, S. (2015). Foucault and the Government of Disability (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting Leadership from the Industrial Age to the Knowledge Era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Weil, S. (1997). Rhetorics and Realities in Public Service Organisations: Systemic Practice and Organisational as Critically Reflexive Action Research (CRAR). Systemic Practice and Action Research, 11(1), 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tillie Curran
    • 1
  • Ruth Sayers
    • 2
  • Barry Percy-Smith
    • 3
  1. 1.University of the West of EnglandBristolUK
  2. 2.McPin FoundationLondonUK
  3. 3.University of HuddersfieldHuddersfieldUK

Personalised recommendations