Making Policy for Whom? The Significance of the ‘Psychoanalytic Medical Humanities’ for Policy and Practice That Affects the Lives of Disabled Children

  • Harriet Cooper
Chapter

Abstract

  • This chapter considers the possible role of psychoanalysis in developing a theory of how oppression may be internalised by children during interactions with clinicians, social workers and researchers.

  • How can the clinical encounter become a space for reflection? Can oppressive dynamics within the clinical encounter be altered?

  • Psychoanalysis has often been viewed with suspicion within disability studies: this chapter explores what it might mean to become an ‘ambivalent advocate’ of psychoanalysis as a disability activist.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful for the financial support from Birkbeck’s Institutional Strategic Support Funding from the Wellcome Trust, which enabled me to research and write this chapter.

References

  1. Abbott, D. (2013). Who Says What, Where, Why and How? Doing Real-World Research with Disabled Children, Young People and Family Members. In T. Curran & K. Runswick-Cole (Eds.), Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: Critical Approaches in a Global Context (pp. 39–56). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, S. (2014). Willful Subjects. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balint, M. (1964). The Doctor, His Patient and the Illness (2nd ed.). London: Pitman Medical Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Balint Society website. (2012). http://balint.co.uk/. Accessed 30 Aug 2015.
  5. Balint, E., Courtenay, M., Elder, A., Hull, S., & Julian, P. (1993). The Doctor, the Patient and the Group: Balint Revisited. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, J. (1997). Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. Abingdon/Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Caselli, D. (2010). Kindergarten Theory: Childhood, Affect, Critical Thought. Feminist Theory, 11(3), 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Centre for Medical Humanities website, Durham University. (2009). https://www.dur.ac.uk/cmh/medicalhumanities/. Accessed 30 Aug 2015.
  9. Collini, S. (2012). What Are Universities For? London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, H. (2015). Making the Disabled Child: Critical Disability Studies at the Intersection of Cultural Representation and Lived Experience (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). University of London, Birkbeck.Google Scholar
  11. Curran, T., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2013a). Preface. In T. Curran & K. Runswick-Cole (Eds.), Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: Critical Approaches in a Global Context (pp. ix–xi). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Curran, T., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2013b). Concluding Thoughts and Future Directions. In T. Curran & K. Runswick-Cole (Eds.), Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: Critical Approaches in a Global Context (pp. 196–199). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fanon, F. (1970 [1967]). Black Skin, White Masks (C. L. Markmann, Trans.). London: Paladin.Google Scholar
  14. Ferenczi, S. (1933). Confusion of Tongues Between Adults and the Child (The Language of Tenderness and of Passion). In J. Borossa (Ed.), (1999) Sándor Ferenczi: Selected Writings (pp. 293–303). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. Goodley, D. (2011). Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/Ability Studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism. Abingdon/Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2012). Reading Rosie: The Postmodern Disabled Child. Educational and Child Psychology, 29(2), 51–64.Google Scholar
  18. Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2013). Doing Qualitative Research Differently: A Psychosocial Approach (2nd ed.). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kirklin, D., & Richardson, R. (2001). Introduction: Medical Humanities and Tomorrow’s Doctors. In D. Kirklin & R. Richardson (Eds.), Medical Humanities: A Practical Introduction (pp. 1–6). London: Royal College of Physicians.Google Scholar
  20. Lesnik-Oberstein, K. (1994). Children’s Literature: Criticism and the Fictional Child. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lesnik-Oberstein, K. (2008). On Having an Own Child: Reproductive Technologies and the Cultural Construction of Childhood. London: Karnac.Google Scholar
  22. Lesnik-Oberstein, K. (2011). Introduction: Voice, Agency and the Child. In K. Lesnik-Oberstein (Ed.), Children in Culture, Revisited: Further Approaches to Childhood (pp. 1–17). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McRuer, R. (2006). Compulsory Able-Bodiedness and Queer/Disabled Existence. In L. J. Davis (Ed.), The Disability Studies Reader (2nd ed., pp. 301–308). Abingdon/Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Oliver, M. (1983). Social Work with Disabled People. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oliver, M. (1993). What’s So Wonderful About Walking? Inaugural Lecture. University of Greenwich. Online at: http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/Oliver-PROFLEC.pdf. Accessed Aug 2016.
  26. Reeve, D. (2008). Negotiating Disability in Everyday Life: The Experience of Psycho-Emotional Disablism (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  27. Rose, J. (1984). The Case of Peter Pan, or the Impossibility of Children’s Fiction. London/Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shakespeare, T. (1997). Cultural Representation of Disabled People: Dustbins for Disavowal? In L. Barton & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disability Studies: Past Present and Future (pp. 217–233). Leeds: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
  29. Shakespeare, T. (2014). Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited (2nd ed.). Abingdon/Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Tavistock and Portman website. (2015). http://tavistockandportman.uk/. Accessed 1 Sep 2015.
  31. Taylor, B. (2014). The Last Asylum: A Memoir of Madness in Our Times. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
  32. Thomas, C. (1999). Female Forms: Experiencing and Understanding Disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Viney, W., Callard, F., & Woods, A. (2015). Critical Medical Humanities: Embracing Entanglement, Taking Risks. Medical Humanities, 41, 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Watermeyer, B. (2013). Towards a Contextual Psychology of Disablism. Abingdon/Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. World Health Organization (WHO). (2011). World Report on Disability. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  36. Wright, K. (1991). Vision and Separation: Between Mother and Baby. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harriet Cooper
    • 1
  1. 1.University of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations