Advertisement

A Relational Understanding of Language Impairment: Children’s Experiences in the Context of Their Social Worlds

  • Helen Hambly
Chapter

Abstract

  • Children’s experiences of language impairment (LI) were predominantly relational—they varied depending on the social situation and the attitudes and behaviours of others towards them.

  • Other people’s understandings and interpretations of children’s language behaviours varied widely.

  • Children’s experiences of agency were closely associated with emotional experience and participation in or withdrawal from situations.

  • Professional support for children with LI may be improved by targeting relationships between children and others rather than predominantly focusing on individuals’ impairments.

References

  1. Bishop, D. V. (2014). Ten Questions About Terminology for Children with Unexplained Language Problems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 49(4), 381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Children and Families Act. (2014). London: The Stationary Office (c.6).Google Scholar
  3. Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2001). Listening to Young Children: The MOSAIC Approach. London: National Children’s Bureau/Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  4. Coad, J. (2007). Using Art-Based Techniques in Engaging Children and Young People in Health Care Consultations and/or Research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 12(5), 487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Curran, T., & Runswick-Cole, K. (Eds.). (2013). Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: Critical Approaches in a Global Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Department for Education. (2011). Support and Aspiration: A New Approach to Special Education Needs and Disability. London: The Stationery Office (Cm 8027).Google Scholar
  7. Department for Education. (2012). Support and Aspiration: A New Approach to Special Education Needs and Disability: Progress and Next Steps. London: The Stationery Office (Cm 8027).Google Scholar
  8. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
  9. Goodley, D., & Roets, G. (2008). The (be) Comings and Goings of ‘Developmental Disabilities’: The Cultural Politics of ‘Impairment’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 29(2), 239–255.Google Scholar
  10. Hambly, H. (2014). Children’s, Parents’, Peers’ and Professionals’ Experiences of Language Impairment: A Multi-perspective Study to Identify Psychosocial Goals for Intervention (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). University of the West of England, Bristol.Google Scholar
  11. Hodge, N., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2013). ‘They Never Pass Me the Ball’: Disabled Children’s Experiences of Leisure. Children’s Geographies, 11(3), 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McLeod, S., Daniel, G., & Barr, J. (2013). “When He’s Around His Brothers He’s Not So Quiet”: The Private and Public Worlds of School-Aged Children with Speech Sound Disorder. Journal of Communication Disorders, 46, 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Murphy, J., Tester, S., Hubbard, G., Downs, M., & MacDonald, C. (2005). Enabling Frail Older People with a Communication Difficulty to Express Their Views: The Use of Talking Mats® as an Interview Tool. Health and social care in the community, 13(2), 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Reeve, D. (2002). Negotiating Psycho-Emotional Dimensions of Disability and Their Influence on Identity Constructions. Disability & Society, 17(5), 493–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Reilly, S., Bishop, D. V., & Tomblin, B. (2014). Terminological Debate Over Language Impairment in Children: Forward Movement and Sticking Points. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 49(4), 452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roulstone, S., Coad, J., Ayre, A., Hambly, H., & Lindsay, G. (2012). The Preferred Outcomes of Children with Speech, Language and Communication Needs and Their Parents. London: Department for Education.Google Scholar
  17. Smith, J., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  18. Watson, N. (2002). Well, I Know This Is Going to Sound Very strange to You, but I Don’t See Myself as a Disabled Person: Identity and Disability. Disability & Society, 17(5), 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wickenden, M. (2010). Teenage Worlds, Different Voices: An Ethnographic Study of Identity and the Life Worlds of Disabled Teenagers Who Use AAC (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). The University of Sheffield, Sheffield.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen Hambly
    • 1
  1. 1.Peninsula Cerebra Research Unit (PenCRU), University of Exeter Medical SchoolExeterUK

Personalised recommendations