Advertisement

Personalisation Policy and Parents: The Formalisation of Family Care for Adult Children with Learning Disabilities in England

  • Barbara Coles
Chapter

Abstract

  • This chapter discusses the experience of parenting disabled men and women who have been labelled as having a severe learning disability.

  • It draws on (auto) ethnographic research into the role of Suitable Person in England.

  • It explains the role of Suitable Person in assisting with, and taking responsibility for, all decision-making before exploring a key theme arising from the data: ‘power within partnership working between parents and professionals’.

  • The chapter highlights the risks of parents becoming vulnerable in the role of Suitable Person, and suggests urgent action to change this serious situation in order to ensure disabled adults have choice and control over their life.

References

  1. Anonymous Family Carer. (2008). In Control? Making Sure We Are Not Out of Control! Some Issues for People Considering a Direct Payment or Individualized Budget. The Journal of Adult Protection, 10(3), 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arksey, H., & Baxter, K. (2012). Exploring the Temporal Aspects of Direct Payments. British Journal of Social Work, 42(1), 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beresford, P. (2001). Service Users, Social Policy and the Future of Welfare Critical Social Policy, 21(4), 494–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carers UK. (2008). Choice or Chore? Carers Experience of Direct Payments. London: Carers UK.Google Scholar
  5. Coles, B. A. (2013). ‘Suitable People’: An (Auto) Ethnographic Study of Parents’ Experiences of Managing Direct Payments for Their Adult Children Who Have Severe Learning Disabilities and Complex Support Needs. Unpublished, Norah Fry Research Centre, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  6. Coles, B. (2015). A ‘Suitable Person’: An ‘Insider’ Perspective. British Journal of Learning Disabilities (John Wiley & Sons Ltd.), 43, 135–141.Google Scholar
  7. Department of Health. (1996). Disabled Persons (Services, Consultation and Representation) Act. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  8. Department of Health. (2003). Direct Payment Guidance: Community Care Services for Carers and Children’s Services (Direct Payment Guidance). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  9. Department of Health. (2005). Mental Capacity Act (England and Wales). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  10. Department of Health. (2006). Our Health, Our Care, Our Say. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  11. Department of Health. (2008). An Introduction to Personalisation. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  12. Department of Health. (2009). Guidance on Direct Payments for Community Care, Services for Carers and Children’s Services: England 2009. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  13. Department of Health. (2010a). Carers and Personalisation: Improving Outcomes. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  14. Department of Health. (2010b). Recognised, Valued and Supported: Next Steps for the Carers Strategy. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  15. Emerson, E., & Hatton, C. (2008). People with Learning Disabilities in England (pp. 26–27). Lancaster: Centre for Disability Research. Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power (Afterword). In H. L. Drefus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
  17. Geertz, C. (1989). Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. In Spry, T. (2001). Performing Autoethnography: An Embodied Methodological Praxis. Qualitative Enquiry, 7(6).Google Scholar
  18. Glendinning, C., Moran, N., & Rabiee, P. (2008). Evaluation of the Individual Budget Initiative (IBSEN). York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York. http://php.york.ac.uk/inst/spru/research/summs/ibsen.php
  19. Glendinning, C., Tjadens, F., Arksey, H., Moree, M., Moran, N., & Nies, H. (2009). Care Provision Within Families and Its Socio-Economic Impact on Care Providers. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.Google Scholar
  20. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2009). Ethnography: Principles and Practice (3rd ed.). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Held, V. (2006). The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political and Global. In Lloyd, L. (2012). Health and Care in Ageing Societies: A New International Approach (p. 4). The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mitchell, W., Glendinning, C., & Brooks, J. (2014). Carers’ Roles in Personal Budgets: Tensions and Dilemmas in Front Line Practice. British Journal of Social Work. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcu018.
  23. Moran, N., Glendinning, C., Stevens, M., Manthorpe, J., Jacobs, S., Wilberforce, M., Knapp, M., Challis, D., Fernandez, J. L., Jones, K., & Netten, A. (2011). Joining Up Government by Integrating Funding Streams? The Experiences of the Individual Budget Pilot Projects for Older and Disabled People in England. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(4), 232–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Spry, T. (2001). Performing Autoethnography: An Embodied Methodological Praxis. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 706–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1989). Introduction to Qualitative Research. In Aronson, J. (1994). A Pragmatic View of Thematic Analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1, Spring).Google Scholar
  26. Williams, F. (2010). Claiming and Framing in the Making of Our Policies: The Recognition and Redistribution of Care. In Lloyd, L. (2012). Health and Care in Ageing Societies: A New International Approach. The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  27. Williams, V. (2013). Learning Disability Policy and Practice: Changing Lives? London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Williams, V., & Robinson, C. (2000). In Their Own Right: The Carers Act and Carers of People with Learning Disabilities. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  29. Williams, V., & Robinson, C. (2001). More Than One Wavelength: Identifying, Understanding and Resolving Conflicts of Interest Between People with Intellectual Disabilities and the Family Carers. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 14, 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Williams, V., Robinson, C., Simons, K., Gramlich, S., McBride, G., Snelham, N., & Myres, B. (2003). Paying the Piper and Calling the Tune? The Relationship Between Parents and Direct Payments for People with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16, 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Williams, V., Porter, S., & Strong, S. (2013). The Shifting Sands of Support Planning. Journal of Integrated Care, 21(3), 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Coles
    • 1
  1. 1.Family Carer ResearcherBristolUK

Personalised recommendations