Personalisation Policy and Parents: The Formalisation of Family Care for Adult Children with Learning Disabilities in England
This chapter discusses the experience of parenting disabled men and women who have been labelled as having a severe learning disability.
It draws on (auto) ethnographic research into the role of Suitable Person in England.
It explains the role of Suitable Person in assisting with, and taking responsibility for, all decision-making before exploring a key theme arising from the data: ‘power within partnership working between parents and professionals’.
The chapter highlights the risks of parents becoming vulnerable in the role of Suitable Person, and suggests urgent action to change this serious situation in order to ensure disabled adults have choice and control over their life.
- Carers UK. (2008). Choice or Chore? Carers Experience of Direct Payments. London: Carers UK.Google Scholar
- Coles, B. A. (2013). ‘Suitable People’: An (Auto) Ethnographic Study of Parents’ Experiences of Managing Direct Payments for Their Adult Children Who Have Severe Learning Disabilities and Complex Support Needs. Unpublished, Norah Fry Research Centre, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
- Coles, B. (2015). A ‘Suitable Person’: An ‘Insider’ Perspective. British Journal of Learning Disabilities (John Wiley & Sons Ltd.), 43, 135–141.Google Scholar
- Department of Health. (1996). Disabled Persons (Services, Consultation and Representation) Act. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Department of Health. (2003). Direct Payment Guidance: Community Care Services for Carers and Children’s Services (Direct Payment Guidance). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Department of Health. (2005). Mental Capacity Act (England and Wales). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Department of Health. (2006). Our Health, Our Care, Our Say. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Department of Health. (2008). An Introduction to Personalisation. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Department of Health. (2009). Guidance on Direct Payments for Community Care, Services for Carers and Children’s Services: England 2009. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Department of Health. (2010a). Carers and Personalisation: Improving Outcomes. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Department of Health. (2010b). Recognised, Valued and Supported: Next Steps for the Carers Strategy. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Emerson, E., & Hatton, C. (2008). People with Learning Disabilities in England (pp. 26–27). Lancaster: Centre for Disability Research. Lancaster University.Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power (Afterword). In H. L. Drefus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
- Geertz, C. (1989). Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. In Spry, T. (2001). Performing Autoethnography: An Embodied Methodological Praxis. Qualitative Enquiry, 7(6).Google Scholar
- Glendinning, C., Moran, N., & Rabiee, P. (2008). Evaluation of the Individual Budget Initiative (IBSEN). York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York. http://php.york.ac.uk/inst/spru/research/summs/ibsen.php
- Glendinning, C., Tjadens, F., Arksey, H., Moree, M., Moran, N., & Nies, H. (2009). Care Provision Within Families and Its Socio-Economic Impact on Care Providers. York: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York.Google Scholar
- Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2009). Ethnography: Principles and Practice (3rd ed.). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Held, V. (2006). The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political and Global. In Lloyd, L. (2012). Health and Care in Ageing Societies: A New International Approach (p. 4). The Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Mitchell, W., Glendinning, C., & Brooks, J. (2014). Carers’ Roles in Personal Budgets: Tensions and Dilemmas in Front Line Practice. British Journal of Social Work. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcu018.
- Moran, N., Glendinning, C., Stevens, M., Manthorpe, J., Jacobs, S., Wilberforce, M., Knapp, M., Challis, D., Fernandez, J. L., Jones, K., & Netten, A. (2011). Joining Up Government by Integrating Funding Streams? The Experiences of the Individual Budget Pilot Projects for Older and Disabled People in England. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(4), 232–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1989). Introduction to Qualitative Research. In Aronson, J. (1994). A Pragmatic View of Thematic Analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(1, Spring).Google Scholar
- Williams, F. (2010). Claiming and Framing in the Making of Our Policies: The Recognition and Redistribution of Care. In Lloyd, L. (2012). Health and Care in Ageing Societies: A New International Approach. The Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Williams, V., & Robinson, C. (2000). In Their Own Right: The Carers Act and Carers of People with Learning Disabilities. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Williams, V., Robinson, C., Simons, K., Gramlich, S., McBride, G., Snelham, N., & Myres, B. (2003). Paying the Piper and Calling the Tune? The Relationship Between Parents and Direct Payments for People with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 16, 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar