The ‘Disability Commons’: Re-thinking Mothering Through Disability

  • Katherine Runswick-Cole
  • Dan Goodley
Chapter

Abstract

  • In England, ‘good parenting’ has become a focus for government policy alongside the view that early intervention in children’s lives is critical for their cognitive and emotional development;

  • Despite the gender neutral policy discourse, mothers still bear the majority of the responsibility for care;

  • In austere times, mothers are expected to labour and care to produce children who do not place a social or economic burden on the state—this is ‘austerity parenting’;

  • ‘Austerity parenting’ makes mothers of disabled children precarious as they and their children are seen as making present and future demands on the resources of the state;

  • In order to escape blame, mothers of disabled children must accept their child’s difference and disorder;

  • Mothers of disabled children find themselves having to claim that their disabled children are both ‘same as’ and ‘different from’ other children in order to claim their right to be included in wider society;

  • We describe the temporal and geographical location of the seemingly ‘natural’ importance of the mother-child dyad within studies of childhood;

  • We conclude by re-thinking mothering through disability to call for a coming together of the ‘disability commons’ to campaign for the rights of disabled children and young people.

References

  1. Berlant, L. (2006). Cruel Optimism. Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 17(3), 20–36.Google Scholar
  2. Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Malden: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Broomhead, K. E. (2013). Blame, Guilt and the Need for ‘Labels’; Insights from Parents of Children with Special Educational Needs (SEN) and Educational Practitioners. British Journal of Special Education, 40(1), 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron, D. (2011). Speech on the Big Society. Available from: http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/speechon-the-big-society/. Accessed 20 Oct 2011.
  5. Chataika, T., & McKenzie, J. (2013). Considerations for an African Childhood Disability Studies. In T. Curran & K. Runswick-Cole (Eds.), Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: Critical Approaches in a Global Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. Contact-a-Family. (2011). Forgotten Families: The Impact of Isolation on Families with Disabled Children Across the UK. http://www.cafamily.org.uk/media/381636/forgotten_isolation_report.pdf. Accessed 7 Mar 2015.
  7. Cooper, H. (2013). “The Spectre of the Norm”: Historicising the Notion of the ‘Normal Child’. In T. Curran & K. Runswick-Cole (Eds.), Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: Critical Approaches in a Global Context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Curran, T., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). Disabled Children’s Childhood Studies: An Emerging Domain of Inquiry? Disability & Society, 29(10), 1617–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Benedictis, S. (2012). ‘Feral’ Parents: Austerity Parenting Under Neoliberalism. Studies in the Maternal, 4(2), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Department for Communities & Local Government. (2012). Helping Troubled Families Turn Their Lives Around. https://www.gov.uk/government/policies/helping-troubled-families-turn-their-lives-around. Accessed 20 Feb 2015.
  11. Ecclestone, K., & Hayes, D. (2008). The Dangerous Rise of Therapeutic Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Gillies, V. (2005). Meeting Parents’ Needs? Discourses of ‘Support’ and ‘Inclusion’ in Family Policy. Critical Social Policy, 25(1), 70–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gillies, V. (2007). Marginalised Mothers: Exploring Working-Class Experiences of Parenting. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Goodley, D. (2014). Dis/ability Studies: Theorising Disablism and Ableism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2010). Emancipating Play: Dis/abled Children, Development and Deconstruction. Disability & Society, 25(4), 499–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2011a). Problematising Policy: Conceptions of ‘Child’, ‘Disabled’ and ‘Parents’ in Social Policy in England. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2011b). The Violence of Disablism. Journal of Sociology of Health and Illness, 33(4), 602–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014a). Critical Psychologies of Disability: Boundaries, Borders and Bodies in the Lives of Disabled Children. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2014.947096. Accessed 7 Mar 2015.
  19. Goodley, D., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2014b). Becoming Dis/human: Thinking About the Human Through Disability. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01596306.2014.930021#preview. Accessed 7 Mar 2015.
  20. Goodley, D., Runswick-Cole, K., & Liddiard, K. (2015). The DisHuman Child. Discourse: The Cultural Politics of Education, 37(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  21. Greenspan, M. (1998). ‘Exceptional’ Mothering in a ‘Normal’ World’. In K. Weingarten (Ed.), Mothering Against the Odds: Diverse Voices of Contemporary Mothers. London: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gregory, S. (1991). Mother’s and Their Deaf Children. In Motherhood: Meanings, Practices and Ideologies. In E. Lloyd (Ed.), Motherhood. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Hodge, N., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2013). They Never Pass Me the Ball’: Disabled Children’s Experiences of Leisure. Children’s Geographies, II(3), 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hussain, T., & Hyde-Bales, K. (2014). Independent Investigation into the Death of CS. London: Verita.Google Scholar
  25. Jackson, J. (2004). Multicoloured Mayhem: Parenting the Many Shades of Adolescents and Children with Autism, Asperger Syndrome and AD/HD. London: Jessica Kingsley Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Jensen, T. (2012). Tough Love in Tough Times. Studies in the Maternal, 4(2), 1–26.Google Scholar
  27. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Lowe, P., Lee, E., & Macvarish, M. (2015). Biologising Parenting: Neuroscience Discourse, English Social and Public Health Policy and Understandings of the Child. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(8), 198–211.Google Scholar
  29. Mallett, R., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2012). Commodifying Autism: The Cultural Contexts of ‘Disability’ in the Academy. In D. Goodley, B. Hughes, & L. J. Davis (Eds.), Disability and Social Theory (pp. 33–51). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. McLaughlin, J., Goodley, D., Clavering, E., & Fisher, P. (2008). Families Raising Disabled Children: Enabling Care and Social Justice. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McRobbie, A. (2009). The Aftermath of Feminism : Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Moore, C. (2012). George and Sam. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  33. Nadesan, M. H. (2005). Constructing Autism: Unravelling the Truth and Constructing the Social. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Puar, J. K. (2012). Precarity Talk: A Virtual Roundtable with Lauren Berlant, Judith Butler, Bojana Cvejic, Isabell Lorey, Jasbir Puar, and Ana Vujanovic. TDR: The Drama Review, 56(4), 163–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Read, J. (2000). Disability, the Family and Society: Listening to Mothers. Buckingham: The Open University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Runswick-Cole, K. (2007). The Tribunal Was the Most Stressful Thing: More Stressful than My Son’s Diagnosis or Behaviour’: The Experiences of Families Who Go to the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal (SENDIST). Disability and Society, 22(3), 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Runswick-Cole, K. (2011). Time to End the Bias Towards Inclusive Education? British Journal of Special Education, 38(3), 112–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Runswick-Cole, K. (2014). “Us” and “Them”? The Limits and Possibilities of a Politics of Neurodiversity in Neoliberal Times. Disability & Society, 29(7), 11171129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Runswick-Cole, K., & Goodley, D. (2015). Disability and Austerity: ‘Cruel Optimism’ in Big Society. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 4(2), 162–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ryan, S. (2005). Busy Behaviour in the ‘Land of the Golden M. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 18, 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ryan, S., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2008a). Repositioning Mothers: Mothers, Disabled Children and Disability Studies. Disability and Society, 23(3), 199–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ryan, S., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2008b). From Advocate to Activist? Mapping the Experiences of Mothers of Children on the Autism Spectrum. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22(1), 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Skeggs, B. (2005). The Making of Class and Gender Through Visualizing Moral Subject Formation. Sociology, 39(5), 965–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Skeggs, B. (2010). The Value of Relationships: Affective Scenes and Emotional Performances. Feminist Legal Studies, 18(1), 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stone, D. (1984). The Disabled State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Traustadóttir, R. (1995). A Mother’s Work Is Never Done: Constructing a “Normal” Family Life. In S. J. Taylor, R. Bogdan, & Z. M. Lutfiyya (Eds.), The Variety of Community Experience: Qualitative Studies of Family and Community Life. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.Google Scholar
  49. Tyler, I. (2008). Chav Mum Chav Scum. Feminist Media Studies, 8(1), 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tyler, I. (2013). Revolting Subjects: The Politics of Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  51. UNICEF. (1989). United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Geneva: Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.Google Scholar
  52. Wright Mills, C. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine Runswick-Cole
    • 1
  • Dan Goodley
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations