Advertisement

My Friends and Me: Friendship and Identity Following Acquired Brain Injury in Young People

  • Sandra Dowling
  • Roy McConkey
  • Marlene Sinclair
Chapter

Abstract

Friendship plays an important role in the development of identity in adolescence. Amongst young people who have experienced an acquired brain injury, friendship can be seen as a key site in the reconstruction of identity. This chapter draws on research conducted with nine young people, all of whom had experienced a life-threatening brain injury. The research employed a creative approach to data collection, namely using collage to mediate a narrative method. The chapter draws on findings from the study in relation to the interplay between friendship, interpersonal relationships with peers and the redrawing of identity amongst participants. Excerpts from collages and narratives are used to illustrate the chapter. Changes in young peoples’ social world are highlighted in the wake of a diminished social circle. How young people internalise perceived negative interactions in terms of their redrawn sense of self is described.

References

  1. Andrews, T. K., Rose, F. D., & Johnson, D. A. (1998). Social and Behavioural Effect of Traumatic Brain Injury in Children. Brain Injury, 12(2), 133138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bedell, G. M., & Dumas, H. M. (2004). Social Participation of Children and Youth with Acquired Brain Injuries Discharged from Inpatient Rehabilitation: A Follow-Up Study. Brain Injury, 18(1), 6582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Browning, D. L. (Ed.). (2007). Adolescent Identities: A Collection of Readings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Boylan, A. M. (2014). Social Inclusion Following Childhood Acquired Brain Injury (ABI): A Qualitative Exploration. Brain Injury, 28(5–6), 824.Google Scholar
  5. Calderwood, L. (2003). Cracked: Recovering After Traumatic Brain Injury. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  6. Crothers, I. R., Linden, M. A., & Kennedy, N. (2007). Attitudes of Children Towards Peers with Acquired Brain Injury. Brain Injury, 21(1), 4752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dowling, S. (2009). It’s Like Two Different People But Me: Identity Following Acquired Brain Injury in Young People. PhD Thesis, Ulster University.Google Scholar
  8. Dowling, S., McConkey, R., & Sinclair, M. (forthcoming). Collage as Method in Qualitative Research. Paper submitted for publication. Google Scholar
  9. Dixon, R., McLellan, D. L., & Morgan, J. (2008). Review of Services for People with Traumatic Brain Injury in Northern Ireland. www.dhsspsni.gov.uk/acquired_brain_injury_review.pdf. Accessed July 2017.
  10. Gracey, F., et al. (2008). ‘Feeling Part of Things’: Personal Construction of Self After Brain Injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18(5/6), 627650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hawley, C. A. (2002). Behaviour and School Performances After Brain Injury. Brain Injury, 18(7), 645–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hubert, J. (1985). Life After Head Injury; The Experiences of Twenty Young People and Their Families. Avebury: Brookfield.Google Scholar
  13. Kroger, J. (2004). Identity in Adolescence: The balance Between Self and Other. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kupersmidt, J. B., Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1990). The Role of Poor Peer Relationships in the Development of Disorder. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer Rejection in Childhood (pp. 274–305). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Linden, M. A., Rauch, R., & Crothers, I. R. (2005). Public Attitudes Towards Survivors of Brain Injury. Brain Injury, 19(12), 1011–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCabe, R. J. R., & Green, D. (1987). Rehabilitating Severely Head-Injured Adolescents: Three Case Reports. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 28(1), 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Osborn, C. L. (1998). Over My Head: A Doctors Own Story of Head Injury from the Inside Looking Out. Kansas City: Andrews McMeel Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer Relations and Later Personal Adjustment: Are Low-Accepted Children at Risk? Psychological Bulletin, 102, 357389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shrauger, J., & Schoeneman, T. (1999). Symbolic Interactionist View of Self-Concept: Through the Looking Glass Darkly. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), The Self in Social Psychology. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2004). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. In G. M. Breakwell (Ed.), Doing Social Psychology Research. Oxford: BPA Blackwell.Google Scholar
  22. Tyerman, A., & Humphrey, M. (1984). Changes in Self-Concept Following Severe Head Injury. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 7, 1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Dowling
    • 1
  • Roy McConkey
    • 2
  • Marlene Sinclair
    • 2
  1. 1.University of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.University of UlsterNorthern IrelandUK

Personalised recommendations