Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Return of Looted Objects to Their Countries of Origin: The Case for Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook on Art Crime

Abstract

The journalistic investigation into the activities of a major London auction house in the 1990s led directly to the seizure of an important cache of documentation and images at the Geneva Freeport. As a result over 350 items have been returned to Italy from dealers, galleries and auction houses, North American public museums and private collectors. The 1970 UNESCO Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property has provided a benchmark for claims on the return of cultural property. There is a need to enhance the due diligence process undertaken by the market. Although some North American museums have changed their acquisition policies, some curatorial staff display open hostility towards enhanced ethical responsibilities and an unwillingness to comply with further investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Apostolidis, A., & Brodie, N. (2007). History lost. Athens: Hellenic Foundation for Culture/Anemon Productions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. (2016). Notes on Marlowe’s “What we talk about when we talk about provenance”. International Journal of Cultural Property, 23, 254–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. (2013). Praxiteles: The Cleveland Apollo. Cleveland Masterwork Series, vol. 2. Cleveland: The Cleveland Museum of Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bothmer, D. (1984). A Greek and Roman treasury. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bothmer, D. (Ed.). (1990). Glories of the past: Ancient art from the Shelby White and Leon Levy collection. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, J. (1995). A layman’s attempts to precipitate change in domestic and international “heritage” laws. In K. W. Tubb (Ed.), Antiquities trade or betrayed: Legal, ethical and conservation issues (pp. 145–149). London: Archetype.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaliere, B., & Udell, J. (Eds.). (2012). Ancient Mediterranean art: The William D. and Jane Walsh collection at Fordham University. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chippindale, C., & Gill, D. W. J. (2000). Material consequences of contemporary classical collecting. American Journal of Archaeology, 104, 463–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chippindale, C., Gill, D. W. J., Salter, E., & Hamilton, C. (2001). Collecting the classical world: First steps in a quantitative history. International Journal of Cultural Property, 10, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, B. F. (1997). The Elgin Marbles. London: British Museum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuno, J. (2008). Who owns antiquity? Museums and the battle over our ancient heritage. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuno, J. (Ed.). (2009). Whose culture? The promise of museums and the debate over antiquities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuno, J. (2011). Museums matter: In praise of the encyclopedic museum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Demakopoulou, K. (Ed.). (1996). The Aidonia Treasure: Seals and Jewellery of the Aegean Late Bronze Age. Athens: Ministry of Culture Archaeological Receipts Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demakopoulou, K., & Divari-Valakou, N. (1997). The Aidonia Treasure. Athens: Ministry of Culture Archaeological Receipts Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elia, R. J. (2001). Analysis of the looting, selling, and collecting of Apulian red-figure vases: A quantitative approach. In N. Brodie, J. Doole, & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Trade in illicit antiquities: The destruction of the world’s archaeological heritage (pp. 145–153). Cambridge: McDonald Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exhibition catalogue. (1994). A passion for antiquities: Ancient art from the collection of Barbara and Lawrence Fleischman. Malibu: J. Paul Getty Museum in association with the Cleveland Museum of Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felch, J., & Frammolino, R. (2011). Chasing Aphrodite: The hunt for looted antiquities at the world’s richest museum. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstenblith, P. (1995). The Kanakaria Mosaics and the United States Law on the restitution of stolen and illegally exported cultural property. In K. W. Tubb (Ed.), Antiquities trade or betrayed: Legal, ethical and conservation issues (pp. 105–121). London: Archetype.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getty Museum, J. P. (1993). The Getty Kouros colloquium, Athens, 25–27 May 1992. Athens and Malibu: Nicholas P. Goulandris Foundation/Museum of Cycladic Art/J. Paul Getty Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz-Gentle, P. (2006). Ancient art of the Cyclades. New York: Katonah Museum of Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz-Gentle, P. (2008). The Keros Hoard revisited. American Journal of Archaeology, 112, 299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getz-Preziosi, P. (1987). Early Cycladic art in North American collections. Richmond: Virginia Museum of Fine Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (1997). Sotheby’s, sleaze and subterfuge: Inside the antiquities trade. Antiquity, 71, 468–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D., & Chippindale, C. (2002). The trade in looted antiquities and the return of cultural property: A British parliamentary inquiry. International Journal of Cultural Property, 11(1), 50–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D., & Chippindale, C. (2006). From Boston to Rome: Reflections on returning antiquities. International Journal of Cultural Property, 13, 311–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2007). Review of Peggy Sotirakopoulou, The “Keros Hoard”: Myth or reality? Searching for the lost pieces of a puzzle (Athens: N.P. Goulandris Foundation – Museum of Cycladic Art, 2005). American Journal of Archaeology, 111, 163–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D., & Chippindale, C. (2007a). From Malibu to Rome: Further developments on the return of antiquities. International Journal of Cultural Property, 14, 205–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D., & Chippindale, C. (2007b). The illicit antiquities scandal: What it has done to classical archaeology collections. American Journal of Archaeology, 111, 571–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D., & Chippindale, C. (2008). South Italian pottery in the museum of fine arts, Boston acquired since 1983. Journal of Field Archaeology, 33(4), 462–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2009a). Electronic review of James Cuno Who Owns Antiquity? Museums and the Battle Over Our Ancient Heritage (Princeton University Press, 2008). American Journal of Archaeology, 113, 104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2009b). Review of James Cuno (ed.) Whose Culture? The Promise of Museums and the Debate Over Antiquities (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2009). Journal of Art Crime, 2, 99–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2010a). Collecting histories and the market for classical antiquities. Journal of Art Crime, 3, 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2010b). The returns to Italy from North America: An overview. Journal of Art Crime, 3, 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2011). Context matters: The unresolved case of the Minneapolis krater. Journal of Art Crime, 5, 57–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2012a). Context matters: Princeton and recently surfaced antiquities. Journal of Art Crime, 7, 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2012b). The material and intellectual consequences of acquiring the Sarpedon krater. In P. K. Lazrus & A. W. Barker (Eds.), All the King’s Horses: Essays on the impact of looting and the illicit antiquities trade on our knowledge of the past (pp. 25–42). Washington DC: Society for American Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2012c). Context matters: Fragmented pots, attributions and the role of the academic. Journal of Art Crime, 8, 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2012d). Review of James Cuno, Museums Matter: In Praise of the Encyclopaedic Museum (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2011). Journal of Art Crime, 7, 86–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2013a). Context matters: Dallas museum of art takes the initiative. Journal of Art Crime, 9, 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2013b). Context matters: The Cleveland Apollo goes public. Journal of Art Crime, 10, 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2014a). The case of the Ka Nefer Nefer mummy mask. Journal of Art Crime, 12, 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2014b). Looting Matters: Blogging in a research context. In D. Rocks-Macqueen & C. Webster (Eds.), Blogging archaeology (pp. 44–59, 246–267). Sheffield: Landward Research Ltd..

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2015). Egyptian antiquities on the market. In F. A. Hassan, G. J. Tassie, L. S. Owens, A. De Trafford, J. van Wetering, & O. El Daly (Eds.), The management of Egypt’s cultural heritage (Vol. 2, pp. 67–77). London: ECHO and Golden House Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2016a). Context matters: the Auction Market and Due Diligence: the Need for Action. Journal of Art Crime, 15, 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2016b). Thinking About Collecting Histories: A Response to Marlowe. International Journal of Cultural Property, 23, 237–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2017). Context matters: Drusus minor and tiberius. Journal of Art Crime, 17, 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J. (2018). Returning archaeological objects to Italy, International Journal of Cultural Property 25. Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J., & Chippindale, C. (1993). Material and intellectual consequences of esteem for Cycladic figures. American Journal of Archaeology, 97, 601–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, D. W. J., & Tsirogiannis, C. (2011). Polaroids from the Medici Dossier: continued sightings on the market. Journal of Art Crime, 5, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graepler, D., & Mazzei, M. (1996). Provenienza: sconosciuta! Tombaroli, mercanti e collezionisti: l’Italia archeologica allo sbaraglio. Beri: Edipuglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, P. G., Spatafora, F., & Vassallo, S. (2010). ‘Una phiale d’oro iscritta dall’entroterra di Himera: Dalla Sicilia a New York e ritorno’ Mélanges de l’école française de Rome. Antiquité 122, pp. 451–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchens, C. (2008). The Parthenon Marbles: The case for reunification. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howland, R. H. (Ed.). (2000). The destiny of the Parthenon marbles. Proceedings from a seminar sponsored by the Society for the Preservation of the Greek Heritage and held at the Corcoran Gallery of Art Washington, D.C. February 13, 1999. Washington: Society for the Preservation of the Greek Heritage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, I. (1992). Archaeologists & aesthetes in the sculpture galleries of the British Museum 1800–1939. London: The British Museum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, I. (2001). Cleaning and controversy: The Parthenon sculptures 1811–1939. The British Museum Occasional Paper, vol. 146. London: The British Museum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leader-Newby, R. E. (2004). Silver and society in late antiquity: Functions and meanings of silver plate in the fourth to seventh centuries. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, C. (2016). On Provenance and the Long Lives of Antiquities. International Journal of Cultural Property, 23, 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, C. L., Bennett, M., Marconi, C., & Sofroniew, A. (Eds.). (2013). Sicily: Art and invention between Greece and Rome. Los Angeles: The J. Paul Getty Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, S. R. M. (2005). Going, going, gone: Regulating the market in illicit antiquities. Leicester: Institute of Art and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, E. (2016a). What we talk about when we talk about provenance: A response to Chippindale and Gill. International Journal of Cultural Property, 23, 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, E. (2016b). Response to Responses on “What We Talk About When We Talk About Provenance”. International Journal of Cultural Property, 23, 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattusch, C. C. (1996). The fire of Hephaistos: Large classical bronzes from North American collections. Cambridge: Harvard University Art Museums.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattusch, C. C. (1997). The victorious youth. Getty Museum: Studies on Art. Malibu: J. Paul Getty Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundell-Mango, M. (1990). Un nouveau trésor (dit de “Sevso”) d’argenterie de la basse antiquité. Comptes rendus de l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres, 134, 238–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundell-Mango, M., & Bennet, A. (1994). The Sevso Treasure: Part 1: Art historical description and inscriptions, methods of manufacture and scientific analyses. Journal of Roman Archaeology supplementary series, vol. 12, 1. Ann Arbor: Journal of Roman Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, P. J. (1997). Trade in antiquities: Reducing destruction and theft. London: Archetype Publications; UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özgen, I., & Öztürk, J. (1996). The Lydian treasure: Heritage recovered. Istanbul: Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Culture General Directorate of Monuments and Museums.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papamichelakis, G., & Renfrew, C. (2010). Hearsay about the “Keros Hoard”. American Journal of Archaeology, 114, 181–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, A. J. (1997). Fragments of antiquity: Drawing upon Greek vases. Harvard University Art Museums Bulletin, 5, 1–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perticarari, L., & Giuntani, A. M. (1986). I segreti di un tombarolo. Milano: Rusconi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C. (2008). The Keros Hoard: Remaining questions. American Journal of Archaeology, 112, 295–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, N. (1990). The Icklingham bronzes. Minerva, 1, 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, C. H., & Luke, C. (2006). Looting Lydia: The destruction of an archaeological landscape in western Turkey. In N. Brodie, M. M. Kersel, C. Luke, & K. W. Tubb (Eds.), Archaeology, cultural heritage, and the antiquities trade (pp. 173–187). Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida. Cultural heritage studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sease, C., & Thimme, D. (1995). The Kanakaria Mosaics of Cyprus: The conservators’ view. In K. W. Tubb (Ed.), Antiquities trade or betrayed: Legal, ethical and conservation issues (pp. 122–130). London: Archetype.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotirakopoulou, P. (2005). The “Keros Hoard”: Myth or reality? Searching for the lost pieces of a puzzle. Athens: N.P. Goulandris Foundation – Museum of Cycladic Art.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sotirakopoulou, P. (2008). The Keros Hoard: Some further discussion. American Journal of Archaeology, 112, 279–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. Clair, W. (1983). Lord Elgin and the Marbles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thimme, J. (Ed.). (1977). Art and Culture of the Cyclades: Handbook of an ancient civilisation. Karlsruhe: C.F. Müller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. (1964/1965). Recent acquisitions by Birmingham City Museum. Archaeological Reports, pp. 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins, J. F. (Ed.). (1983). Wealth of the ancient world: The Nelson Bunker Hunt and William Herbert Hunt collections. Fort Worth, TX: Kimbell Art Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsirogiannis, C. (2012). Unravelling the hidden market of illicit antiquities: The Robin Symes – Christos Michaelides network and its international implications. PhD Dissertation, Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsirogiannis, C. (2013). Something is confidential in the state of Christie’s. Journal of Art Crime, 9, 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsirogiannis, C., & Gill, D. W. J. (2014). A fracture in time: A cup attributed to the Euaion painter from the Bothmer collection. International Journal of Cultural Property, 21, 465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, M., & Gill, D. W. J. (1994). Artful crafts: Ancient Greek silverware and pottery. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitelli, K. D. (1980). Implementing the UNESCO Convention: A Challenge for Archaeologists. American Antiquity, 45, 558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. (1997). Sotheby’s, the inside story. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P. (2006). Convicted dealers: What we can learn. In N. Brodie, M. M. Kersel, C. Luke, & K. W. Tubb (Eds.), Archaeology, cultural heritage, and the antiquities trade (pp. 93–97). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, P., & Todeschini, C. (2006). The Medici conspiracy: The illicit journey of looted antiquities from Italy’s tomb raiders to the world’s great museums. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Suffolk, Ipswich, UK

    David W. J. Gill

Authors
  1. David W. J. Gill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David W. J. Gill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

    Saskia Hufnagel

  2. University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Duncan Chappell

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gill, D.W.J. (2019). The Return of Looted Objects to Their Countries of Origin: The Case for Change. In: Hufnagel, S., Chappell, D. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook on Art Crime. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54405-6_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54405-6_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54404-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54405-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation