Abstract
Almost 40 years ago, Tony Lowe commended scholars to move beyond the ideological blindness induced by conventional accounting research and practice grounded in positivist methodology. Such blindness obstructed intellectual emancipation and Lowe urged scholars to step outside the straitjacket by embracing critical methodologies and locate accounting in its broad social and political contexts. This chapter provides conceptual tools for emerging scholars by clarifying the contribution of epistemology, ontology and immanent critique to the development of knowledge. It reflects on the emancipatory possibilities of accounting research by considering the contribution of the Frankfurt School, Burrell and Morgan, Bourdieu and critical realism. It argues that the fundamental attribute of critical methodology is the rejection of any pretence of value freeness, value neutrality, objectivity, disinterestedness or similar prescription that a bona fide scientist is urged to embrace in the pursuit of their research activities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Accounting Standards (formerly Steering) Committee. (1975). The corporate report. London: ICAEW.
Action-Aid. (2010). Calling time: Why SABMiller should stop dodging taxes in Africa. London: Acton-Aid.
Adler, P., & Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 61–89.
Agger, B. (2004). The virtual self. A contemporary sociology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Aglietta, M., & Rebérioux, A. (2005). Corporate governance adrift: A critique of shareholder value. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Agyemang, G., & Lehman, C. (2013). Adding critical accounting voices to migration studies. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(4/5), 261–272.
Allen, W. (1992). Our schizophrenic conception of the business corporation. Cardozo Law Review, 14(2), 261–281.
Amel-Zadeh, A., & Meeks, G. (2013). Bank failure, mark to market and the financial crisis. Abacus, 49(3), 308–339.
Andersen, N. (2003). Discursive analytical strategies: Understanding Foucault, Koselleck, Laclau and Luhmann. Bristol: Policy Press.
Andre, P., Cazavan-Jeny, A., Dick, W., Richard, C., & Walton, P. (2009). Fair value accounting and the banking crisis; shooting the messenger. Accounting in Europe, 6(1), 3–4.
Angier, N. (1999). Woman: An intimate geography. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Angier, N. (2007). The canon. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Annisette, M. (2003). The colour of accountancy: Examining the salience of ‘race’ in a professionalization project. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(7/8), 639–674.
Annisette, M., & Trivedi, V. (2013). Globalization, paradox and the (un)making of identities: Immigrant chartered accountants of India in Canada. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(1), 1–29.
Anthony, R. (1965). Planning and control systems: A framework for analysis. Boston: Harvard University.
Antonio, R. (1981). Immanent critique as the core of critical theory: Its origins and developments in Hegel, Marx and contemporary thought. British Journal of Sociology, 32(3), 330–345.
Armour, J., Deakin, S., & Konzelmann, S. (2003). Shareholder primacy and the trajectory of UK corporate governance. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41(3), 531–555.
Armstrong, P. (1994). The influence of Michel Foucault on accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 5(1), 25–55.
Arnold, P. (2009). Global financial crisis: The challenge to accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6), 803–809.
Arrighi, G. (2010). The long twentieth century: Money, power, and the origins of our times. London: Verso.
Arrington, C. E., & Francis, J. (1989). Letting the chat out of the bag: Deconstruction, privilege and accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14, 1–28.
Arrington, C. E., & Schweiker, W. (1992). The rhetoric and rationality of accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17, 511–533.
Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman and Hall.
Ashby, W. R. (1958). Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica, 1(2), 83–99.
Bakan, J. (2004). The corporation—The pathological pursuit of profit and power. London: Constable and Robinson Ltd.
Ball, R., & Brown, P. (1968). An empirical evaluation of accounting numbers. Journal of Accounting Research, 6, 159–177.
Barley, S., & Kunda, G. (1992). Design and devotion: Surges in rational and normative ideologies of control in managerial discourse. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 363–399.
Barter, N., & Bebbington, J. (2010). Pursuing environmental sustainability (Research report 116). London: ACCA.
Barth, M., & Landsman, W. (2010). How did financial reporting contribute to the banking crisis? Accounting Horizons, 19(3), 399–423.
Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roslender, R. (2016). Thinking About Critical Methodology. In: Haslam, J., Sikka, P. (eds) Pioneers of Critical Accounting. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54212-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54212-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54211-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54212-0
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)