Advertisement

Welfare and Inequality in Market Leninism: China and Vietnam

  • Jonathan D. London
Chapter
Part of the Studies in the Political Economy of Public Policy book series (PEPP)

Abstract

This chapter examines how the transition from state-socialist to market-based social orders in China and Vietnam has shaped social relations and institutional arrangements governing welfare and inequality and with it, welfare and inequality outcomes. It demonstrates how and why patterns of welfare and inequality in China and Vietnam are best understood in relation to these countries’ specific social histories, their specific paths of extrication from state-socialism, and to responses to marketization specific to each country. The chapter explores the effects of market transition on reproductive institutions (i.e., social welfare institutions), and the subsequent redevelopment of these in the context of rapidly if (spatially and temporally) unevenly developing market orders. What is striking about prevailing understandings of the Chinese and Vietnamese experiences is not that communist parties have overseen the most explosive market-based growth in human history, but rather that so many observers are surprised by it. For as the cases of China, Vietnam, all the other countries considered in this volume show, and a wealth of human history shows, market-based social orders are compatible with all manner of political institutions. Be that as it may, this chapter contends that China and Vietnam’s distinctive combination of political and economic institutions generates distinctive implications for patterns of domination, accumulation, and social reproduction. The chapter clarifies these points and explores how and why the regimes, similarities aside, also differ.

References

  1. Allen, Pauline, Qi Cao, and Hufeng Wang. “Public Hospital Autonomy in China in an International Context.” Health Planning and Management, 29 (April/June 2014): 141–159.Google Scholar
  2. Beresford, Melanie. “Vietnam: The Transition from Plan to Market.” In Introduction to the Political Economy of Southeast Asia, edited by Garry Rodan, Kevin Hewison, and Richard Robison, 179–204. Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. Bloom, Gerald. “Private Health Care Meets the Market in China and Vietnam.” Health Policy, 44 (1998): 233–252.Google Scholar
  4. Breslin, Shaun. “Decentralisation, Globalisation and China’s Partial Re-engagement with the Global Economy.” New Political Economy 5, no. 2 (2000): 205–26. Google Scholar
  5. Cai, Fang, and Yang Du. “The Social Protection System in Ageing China.” Asian Economic Policy Review, 10 (2015): 250–270.Google Scholar
  6. Chan, Chak Kwan, King Lun Ngok, and David Phillips. Social Policy in China: Development and Well-being. Policy Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  7. Dang, B. H., S. Bales, K. P. Nguyen, J. Chen, H. Lucas, and M. Segall. Ensuring Health Care for the Rural Poor in Vietnam and China: A State or Market Approach? Hanoi: Medical Publishing House, 2006.Google Scholar
  8. Dao, Quang Vinh. “Social Protection in Vietnam: Successes and Obstacles to Progressively.” 2016. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/egms/docs/2016/Poverty-SDGs/DaoVinh-paper.pdf, accessed May 5, 2017.
  9. ———. “Inclusive Social Protection System in Vietnam.” PowerPoint Presentation. March 13, 2017. Unpublished Policy Brief.Google Scholar
  10. Deacon, Bob. “Eastern European Welfare States: The Impact of the Politics of Globalization.” Journal of European Social Policy, 10 (2000): 146–161.Google Scholar
  11. Fforde, Adam, and Stefan de Vylder. From Plan to Market: The Economic Transition in Vietnam. Boulder: Westview, 1996.Google Scholar
  12. General Statistics Office (GSO). Ket Qua Tom Tat Khao Sat Muc Song Ho Gia Dinh 2006 [Summary of the 2006 Household Living Standards Survey], Hanoi: GSO, 2007.Google Scholar
  13. Giang, Thanh Long. “Social Protection in Vietnam: Current State and Challenges.” In Social Protection in East Asia—Current State and Challenges, edited by Mukul G. Asher, Sothea Oum, and Friska Parulian, 292–315. ERIA Research Project Report 2009, No. 9, 2010.Google Scholar
  14. Guo, Shibao, Yan Guo, Gulbahar Beckett, Qing Li, and Linyuan Guo. “Changes in Chinese Education Under Globalisation and Market Economy: Emerging Issues and Debates.” Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 43 (2013): 244–264.Google Scholar
  15. Herd, Richard, Yu-Wei Hu, and Vincent Koen. “Improving China’s Health Care System.” OECD Economic Department Working Papers, No. 751. Paris: OECD, 2010.Google Scholar
  16. Hong, Liu, and Kristian Kongshøj. “China’s Welfare Reform: An Ambiguous Road Towards a Social Protection Floor.” Global Social Policy, 14 (2014): 352–368.Google Scholar
  17. Jayasuriya, Kanishka, ed. Law Capitalism, and Power in Asia: The Rule of Law and Legal Institutions. London and New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
  18. Kornai, János. Economics of Shortage. Amsterdam: North Holland Publications, 1980.Google Scholar
  19. Leckie, Stuart H. “The People’s Republic of China: Pension System Overview and Reform Directions.” In Pension System and Old-Age Income Support in East and Southeast Asia, edited by Donghyun Park, 26–47. Abingdon and New York: Routledge and ADB, 2011.Google Scholar
  20. Leung, Joe C. B. “The Emergence of Social Assistance in China.” International Journal of Social Welfare, 15 (2006): 188–198.Google Scholar
  21. Lin, Justin Yifu. “The Lessons of China’s Economic Reform.” Working Paper Presented at a Workshop. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1994.Google Scholar
  22. London, Jonathan D. “Vietnam’s Mass Education and Health Systems: A Regimes Perspective.” American Asian Review, 21 (2003): 125–170.Google Scholar
  23. ———. “Vietnam: The Political Economy of Education in a “Socialist” Periphery.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 26, no. 1 (2006): 1–20.Google Scholar
  24. ———. “Vietnam and the Making of Market-Leninism.” Pacific Review, 22 (2009): 373–397.Google Scholar
  25. ———. “Contemporary Vietnam ’s Education System: Historical Roots, Current Trends.” In Education in Vietnam, edited by Jonathan D. London, 1–56. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2010.Google Scholar
  26. ———. “Market-Leninism.” SEARC Working Paper, No. 124. Hong Kong: Southeast Asia Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong, 2011.Google Scholar
  27. ———. “Welfare Regimes in the Wake of State Socialism: China and Vietnam.” In Chinese Social Policy in a Time of Transition, edited by D. J. Besharove and K. Beahler, 18–47. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2013a.Google Scholar
  28. ———. “Socialization (Xā hõi hóa): Contributions, Challenges, and Policy Recommendations.” Updated and edited by Michael Prokop and Pham Thi Lien Phuong. Vietnam: UNDP, 2013b.Google Scholar
  29. ———. “The Promises and Perils of Hospital Autonomy: Reform by Decree in Viet Nam.” Social Science & Medicine, 96 (2013c): 232–240.Google Scholar
  30. ———. “Varieties of States, Varieties of Political Economy: China, Vietnam, and the Making of Market-Leninism.” In Asia After the Developmental State: Disembedding Autonomy, edited by Toby Carroll and Darryl S. L. Jarvis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Forthcoming in 2017.Google Scholar
  31. Malesky, Edmund, Regina Abrami, and Yu Zheng. “Institutions and Inequality in Single-Party Regimes: A Comparative Analysis of Vietnam and China.” Comparative Politics, 43 (July 2011): 409–427.Google Scholar
  32. McGregor, Richard. The Party: The Secret World of China’s Communist Rulers. New York: Harper, 2010.Google Scholar
  33. Ministry of Planning and Investment (MPI). “Chi tiêu cho giáo dục trong các hộ gia đình ở Việt Nam năm 2015.” Household Expenditure on Education in Vietnam 2015.” Hanoi: The Ministry of Planning and Investment, 2016. http://ncif.gov.vn/Pages/NewsDetail.aspx?newid=18779, accessed October 1, 2016.
  34. Ministry of Health (MOH). “Các giâi pháp tài chính y tê cho nguòi nghèo” [Health Financing Measures for the Poor], Unpublished Report. Hanoi: MOH, 2005.Google Scholar
  35. MOF. Statistical Yearbook. Ministry of Finance, Socialist Republic of Vietnam. Hanoi, 2008.Google Scholar
  36. Nee, Victor. “A Theory of Market Transition: From Redistribution to Markets in State Socialism.” American Sociological Review, 54 (October 1989): 663–681.Google Scholar
  37. Nielsen, Ingrid, Chris Nyland, Russell Smyth, and Cherrie Zhu. “Marketization and Perceptions of Social Protection in China’s Cities.” World Development 33, no. 11 (2005): 1759–1781.Google Scholar
  38. Park, Kang H. “Education, Globalization, and Income Inequality in Asia.” ADBI Working Paper Series, No. 732. Asian Development Bank Institute, 2017.Google Scholar
  39. Pei, Minxin. China’s Trapped Transition: The Limits of Developmental Autocracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  40. Polanyi, Karl. Trade and Market in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  41. Postiglione, Gerard A. “Schooling and Inequality in China.” In Education and Social Change in China: Inequality in a Market Economy, edited by Gerard A. Postiglione, 3–24. London and New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
  42. Rong, Xue Lan, and Tianjian Shi. “Inequality in Chinese Education.” Journal of Contemporary China, 10 (2001): 107–124.Google Scholar
  43. Ryan, Janette, ed. China’s Higher Education Reform and Internationalization. London and New York: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar
  44. Saich, Tony. Governance and Politics of China, 3rd Edition. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.Google Scholar
  45. Sasges, Gerard, and Scott Cheshier. Competing Legacies: Rupture and Continuity in Vietnamese Political Economy. South East Asia Research 20, no.1 (2012): 5–33.Google Scholar
  46. Shi, Shih‐Jiunn. “Left to Market and Family–again? Ideas and the Development of the Rural Pension Policy in China.” Social Policy & Administration 40, no. 7 (2006): 791–806.Google Scholar
  47. Shirk, Susan L. The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993.Google Scholar
  48. ———. China: Fragile Superpower: How China’s Internal Politics Could Derail Its Peaceful Rise. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  49. Solinger, Dorothy J. Social Assistance Under Capitalist Authoritarian Rule: Two Management Models in Chinese Municipalities. Journal of Contemporary Asia 44, no. 3 (2013): 500–520.Google Scholar
  50. Sommestad, Lena. “Vietnamese social policy in comparative perspective: towards social policy reform.” Swedish Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA), 2011.Google Scholar
  51. Szelényi, Ivan. “Social Inequalities in State-Socialist Redistributive Economies: Dilemmas for Social Policy in Contemporary Socialist Societies of Eastern Europe.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 19 (1978): 63–87.Google Scholar
  52. ———. “A Theory of Transitions.” Modern China, 34 (2008): 165–175.Google Scholar
  53. ———. From London Welfare Regimes in the Wake of State Socialism. 2010.Google Scholar
  54. Szelényi, Ivan, and Lawrence P. King. “Post-Communist Economic Systems.” In The Handbook of Economic Sociology, edited by Neil J. Smelser and Richard Swedberg, 205–252. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  55. Thompson, Mark R. “Totalitarian and Post-Totalitarian Regimes in Transitions and Non-Transitions from Communism.” Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 3 (2002): 79–106.Google Scholar
  56. Van Doorslaer, Eddy, Owen O’Donnell, Ravindra P. Rannan‐Eliya, Aparnaa Somanathan, Shiva Raj Adhikari, Charu C. Garg, Deni Harbianto et al. “Catastrophic Payments for Health Care in Asia.” Health Economics, 16 (2007): 1159–1184.Google Scholar
  57. Wagstaff, Adam, Magnus Lindelow, Gao Jun, Xu Ling, and Qian Juncheng. “Extending Health Insurance to the Rural Population: An Impact Evaluation of China’s New Cooperative Medical Scheme.” Journal of Health Economics, 28 (January 2009): 1–19.Google Scholar
  58. Walder, Andrew G. “Elite Opportunity in Transitional Economies.” American Sociological Review, 68 (December 2003): 899–916.Google Scholar
  59. Wallerstein, Immanuel, and Gao Jingyu. “Lenin and Leninism Today: An Interview with Immanuel Wallerstien.” International Critical Thought, 2 (2012): 107–112.Google Scholar
  60. Wang, Xiufang. Education in China Since 1976. Jefferson, NC and London: McFarland & Company, Inc., 2003.Google Scholar
  61. Wang, Shao Guang. “China’s Double Movement in Health Care.” In Socialist Register 2010. Morbid Symptoms: Health Under Capitalism, edited by Leo Panitch and Colin Leys, 240–261. London: Merlin Press, 2009.Google Scholar
  62. White, Gordon. “Social Security Reforms in China: Towards an East Asian Model?” In The East Asian Welfare Model, edited by Richard Goodman, Gordon White, and Huck-Ju Kwon, 175–197. New York: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
  63. World Bank. “Data.” 2011. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.XPD.PUBL/countries, accessed July 14, 2013.
  64. ———. World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2016. http://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2016, accessed May 1, 2017.
  65. World Bank and Development Research Center of the State Council (DRCSC). China 2030: Building a Modern Development. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2012.Google Scholar
  66. Wu, Alfred M., and M. Ramesh. “Poverty Reduction in Urban China: The Impact of Cash Transfers.” Social Policy and Society, 13 (April 2014): 285–299.Google Scholar
  67. Yang, Dali. Beyond Beijing: Globalization and the Regions in China. London and New York: Routledge, 1997.Google Scholar
  68. Yang, Dali L. Beyond Beijing: Liberalization and the regions in China. London. Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar
  69. ———. Remaking the Chinese Leviathan: Market Transition and the Politics of Governance in China. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  70. Zhu, Ling. Preferences of Farmers in Making Choices on Health Programmes, 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations