Responsible Innovation: The Case of Alzheimer Diagnostics
Biomedical innovation is often envisioned as a linear process, translating results of lab research into the clinic. The assumption is that deliberation with different concerned parties contributes to responsible innovation. Focusing on the case of Alzheimer diagnostics, Pols and M’charek demonstrate that innovations do not emerge in a linear way. Patient advocacy movements engage with scientific research, and research and clinical practices are highly intertwined. Yet, research and clinical practices may also have very different problem definitions, aims, knowledge, concerns, and pace. Pols and M’charek argue that responsible innovation, rather than privileging a particular type of laboratory research, should start innovations by taking notice of the different manifestations of ‘Alzheimer problems’ and the different science-clinic-representation practices needed to address these problems.
KeywordsResearch Practice Research Proposal Patient Organization Memory Clinic Responsible Innovation
We thank the project leader of the medical project used as exemplar here for generously making available their protocol and the researchers involved in the study of GP diagnostic practice for our discussions and their permission to use their texts for this chapter.
- Anderson, W. 2008. The Collectors of Lost Souls: Turning Kuru Scientists into Whitemen. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- ANL. 2015. http://www.alzheimer-nederland.nl/. Accessed 22 Jul 2015.
- Brown, N. 2003. Hope Against Hype: Accountability in Biopasts, Presents and Futures. Science Studies 16(2): 3–21.Google Scholar
- CBO. 2005 Richtlijn Diagnostiek en medicamenteuze behandeling van dementie. Alphen aan de Rijn: Van Zuiden Communications B.V.Google Scholar
- Epstein, S. 1996. Impure Science; AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Moser, I. 2010. Perhaps Tears Should Not Be Counted but Wiped Away: On Quality and Improvement in Dementia Care. In Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, eds. A. Mol, I. Moser, and J. Pols, 277–300. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.Google Scholar
- NHG. 2012. NHG-Standaard dementie. https://www.nhg.org/standaarden/volledig/nhg-standaard-dementie
- Pols, J. 2014. Knowing patients: turning patient knowledge into science. Science, Technology & Human Values, 39(1): 64–87.Google Scholar
- Prins, A., F. Hemke, J. Pols, and E. Moll van Charante. (2016). Diagnosing Dementia in Dutch General Practice. British Journal of General Practice. http://bjgp.org/content/66/647/e416
- Van den Dungen, P., H.W. van Marwijk, H.E. van der Horst, E.P. Moll van Charante, J. MacNeil Vroomen, P.M. Van der Ven, and H.P. van Hout. 2012. The Accuracy of Family Physicians’ Dementia Diagnoses at Different Stages of Dementia: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 27(4): 342–354.Google Scholar
- Whitehouse, P., and D. George. 2008. The Myth of Alzheimer’s: What You Aren’t Being Told About Today’s Most Dreaded Diagnosis. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar