Abstract
As rising powers, both China and Brazil have gained growing economic and political influence in world politics over the past decades. Meanwhile, Brazil is China’s tenth biggest trading partner, and the largest in Latin America. Closer economic ties have led to expanded political cooperation between the two countries, with their leaderships meeting more frequently on both bilateral and multilateral occasions. But the present reality is that difficulties, such as language barriers and geographic distance, are obstructing cultural understanding between the Chinese and Brazilians. In order to fill this gap, this chapter sets up an inquiry into the cultural aspect of the Sino-Brazilian relationship. It suggests a systematic analysis that adopts Hofstede’s five cultural dimensions to compare the cultural similarities and differences between Brazil and China. The logic of culture holds considerable strength in characterizing the bilateral relations of the two states. A better understanding of these cultural factors can help us “seek common ground while reserving differences” and thus is of great importance to deepening the comprehensive strategic partnership between China and Brazil.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Al-Emadi, Talal A., and Maryam A. Al-Asmakh. 2006. Cultural Differences and Their Impact: Some Brief Comments. Chinese Journal of International Law 5(3): 807–810.
Amado, Gelles, and Haroldo V. Brasil. 1991. Organizational Behaviors and Cultural Context: The Brazilian “Jeitinho”. International Studies of Management and Organization 21(3): 38–61.
Barr, Pamela S., and Mary A. Glynn. 2004. Cultural Variations in Strategic Issue Interpretation: Relating Cultural Uncertainty Avoidance to Controllability in Discriminating Threat and Opportunity. Strategic Management Journal 25(1): 59–67.
Berrell, Mike, and Jet Wrathall. 2007. Between Chinese Culture and the Rule of Law: What Foreign Managers in China Should Know About Intellectual Property Rights? Management Research News 30(1): 57–76.
Brownell, Susan, and Jeffrey N. Wasserstrom. 2002. Chinese Femininities, Chinese Masculinities: A Reader. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Buarque de Hollanda, Sérgio. 1984. Raízes do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Olympio.
Cartwright, S., and A. Gale. 1995. Women in Project Management: Entry into a Male Domain? A Discussion on Gender and Organizational Culture - Part 1. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 16(2): 3–8.
Chan, Ricky Y.K., Louis T.W. Cheng, and Ricky W.F. Szeto. 2002. The Dynamics of Guanxi and Ethics for Chinese Executives. Journal of Business Ethics 41: 327–336.
De Urzeda Freitas, Marco T. 2011. Football, Masculinity and Violence in Brazil. http://www.genderacrossborders.com/2011/05/30/football-masculinity-and-violence-in-brazil/. Accessed 30 May 2011.
Doctoroff, Tom. 2011. The China Code: A Continuum of Twelve Quintessential Chinese Behavioral Characteristics. Society 48(2): 123–130.
Freyre, Gilberto. 1959. New World in the Tropics: The Culture of Modern Brazil. New York: Knopf.
Freyre, Gilberto. 1967. Brazilian National Character in the Twentieth Century. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 370: 57–62.
Griesse, Margaret A. 2007. The Geographic, Political, and Economic Contexts for Corporate Social Responsibility in Brazil. Journal of Business Ethics 73: 21–37.
Hofstede, Geert H. 1991. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, Geert H. 2008. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Hofstede, Geert H., and Michael H. Bond. 1988. The Confucius Connection: From Cultural Roots to Economic Growth. Organizational Dynamics 16(4): 5–21.
Hofstede, Geert H. 1998. Masculinity and Femininity: The Taboo Dimension of National Cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, Geert, Adriana V. Garibaldi de Hilal, Sigmar Malvezzi, Betania Tanure, and Henk Vinken. 2010. Comparing Regional Cultures Within a Country: Lessons from Brazil. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 41(3): 336–352.
Huang, Guanguo, and Xianjin Hu. 2004. Mianzi: Zhongguoren de quanli youxi (Face: Power Game of Chinese People). Beijing: China Renmin University Press.
Liu, Huanqing. 2003. Baxi wenhua (The Culture of Brazil). Beijing: Culture and Art Publishing House.
Metcalf, Alida C. 1990. Women and Means: Women and Family Property in Colonial Brazil. Journal of Social History 24(2): 277–298.
Minkov, Michael, and Geert H. Hofstede. 2012. Hofstede’s Fifth Dimension: New Evidence from the World Values Survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 43(1): 3–14.
Novais, Andréa. 2012. Brazilian Society and Culture. http://thebrazilbusiness.com/article/brazilian-society-and-culture. Accessed 9 September 2012.
Podrug, Najla Davor Filipović, and Ines Stančić. 2014. Analysis of Cultural Differences Between Croatia. Brazil, Germany and Serbia, Economic Research-EkonomskaIstraživanja 27(1): 818–829.
Shambaugh, David. 2010. China’s New Foray into Latin America. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
Singelis, Theodore M., and William J. Brown. 1995. Culture, Self, and Collectivist Communication: Linking Culture to Individual Behavior. Human Communication Research 21(3): 354–389.
Smith, Lauren R., and Skye C. Cooley. 2012. International Faces: An Analysis of Self-inflicted Face-ism in Online Profile Pictures. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research 41(3): 279–296.
Steinfeld, Jemimah. 2014. Women Still Face Great Wall of Discrimination in China. http://edition.cnn.com/2014/03/08/world/asia/china-gender-discrimination/index.html. Accessed 8 March 2014.
Ting-Toomey, Stella. 1988. Intercultural Conflict Styles: A Face-Negotiation Theory. In Theories in Intercultural Communication, ed. Y.Y. Kim and W. Gudykunst, 213–235. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Triandis, Harry C. 1995. Individualism and Collectivism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Véras, Zoeller Erika and Daniel Bicudo Véras. 2014. Cultural Differences Between Countries: the Brazilian and the Chinese Ways of Doing Business. In World Culture Development Forum (2013), 294–307. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.
Yum, June O. 1988. The Impact of Confucianism on Interpersonal Relationships and Communication Patterns in East Asia. Communication Monographs 55: 374–388.
Zhang, Dainian, and Keli Fang (eds.). 2004. Zhongguo wenhua gailun (An Introduction to Chinese Culture). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing Group.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Xi, J. (2016). Cultural Differences and Similarities Between China and Brazil: A Comparative Analysis Using Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions. In: Cui, S., Pérez García, M. (eds) China and Latin America in Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54080-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54080-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54691-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54080-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)