Abstract
The general question explored in this chapter deals with the implications of intellectual property provisions of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) on Mexico and China’s business interests and economic relations. We show in this chapter that Mexico will follow the TPP’s intellectual property rights (IPR) provisions set by the United States. China, because of its economic might has more options to follow, even though a close association with the United States still remains one of its best strategies. In the first part of this chapter, we explore the guiding principles that motivate the main negotiator of the treaty, the country that intends to write the rules related to IPR, that is, the United States. In the second part, we look at Mexico’s and China’s positions in this regard. In the third part, we highlight points of convergence and divergence between both countries in their respective IPR policies. In the conclusion, we draw some implications in terms of business and policy in the perspective of TPP’s IPR provisions for Mexico and China.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Band, J. and J. Gerafi. 2013. Foreign Ownership of Firms in IP-Intensive Industries. http://infojustice.org/archives/28840. Accessed June 2015.
Bringas, R. 2013. Negocios y política en América latina, riesgo político como factor imponderable para los inversionistas. European Scientific Journal 9(4): 158–179.
Brookman, A. 2014. Trade Mark Law: Protection, Enforcement, and Licensing. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.
Burge, D. 1999. Patent and Trademark: Tactics and Practice. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
Cameron, M., and B. Tomli. 2002. The Making of NAFTA: How the Deal Was Done. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Cox, K.L. 2014. The Intellectual Property Chapter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement and Investment in Developing Nations. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 35(4): 1045–1059.
De La Mora, L.M. 2013. México en el acuerdo Estratégico Transpacífico de Asociación Económica. CIDE, 38 p.
De La Parra Trujillo, E. 2006. Comentarios a las reformas a la ley federal de derechos de autor. Revista Mexicana de derecho privado, año III 8: 95–110.
DePillis, L. 2013. Everything you need to know about the trans pacific partnership. The Washington Post, December 11.
Duhamel, F., and D. Bank. 2013. México como plataforma para las inversiones directas chinas? China, América latina y el Caribe: condiciones y retos en el siglo XXI. Publicaciones UNAM.
Dussel Peters, E. 2008. The Impact of China’s Global Economic Expansion on Latin America. World Economy & Finance Research Programme, Working Paper.
Dussel Peters, E. 2012a. The Auto Parts-Automotive Chain in Mexico and China: Co-operation Potential? The China Quarterly 209: 82–110.
Dussel Peters, E. 2012b. Agenda Económico-comercial. en Agenda Estratégica México-China. Agendasia, México.
Dussel Peters, E., and K.P. Gallagher. 2013. NAFTA’s Uninvited Guest: China and the Disintegration of North American Trade. Cepal Review 110: 83–108.
Edsall, T.B. 2014. Free Trade Disagreement. New York Times, February 4.
El Economista. 2014. Canacintra apuesta por Acuerdo de Asociación Transpacífico, October 20.
Frankel, S. 2012. The intellectual property chapter in the TPP. In The Trans-Pacific Partnership, ed. C.L. Lim, D. Elms, and P. Low. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Griffin, J. 2012. Inconsistencies Between the TPP and U.S. Law, Public Knowledge. https://www.publicknowledge.org/files/Jodie’s%20analysis.pdf. Accessed June 2015.
Gueorguiev, D. D., and M. E. Lovely. 2014. The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Perspectives from China, Prepared for: Challenges Facing the World Trade System, Columbia University (September 30, 2014), 32 p.
Herman, B. 2013. The Fight Over Digital Rights: The Politics of Copyright and Technology. New York: University of Cambridge Press.
Highlander, S. 2006. Patent Law. In Research Administration and Management, ed. E. Kulakowski and L. Chronister. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
Hornbeck, J. 2012. The U.S.-Panama Free Trade Agreement, Congressional Research Service, RL32540.
IbisWorld. 2015. Market Research Reports, China Industry Research.
INEGI. 2015. Anuario estadístico y geográfico de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos 2014, Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.
Infojustice. 2012. TPP-ACTA Comparison Table, v. 2.0. http://infojustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/TPP-TRIPS-ACTA-Chile-FTA-Comparison-Table.pdf. Accessed June 2015.
Kinsella, N.S. 2001. Against Intellectual Property. Journal of Libertarian Studies 15(2): 1–54.
INSIDE U.S. TRADE. 2012. Mexico Stresses It Will Be a Full TPP Partner, Despite Terms of Entry, June 22.
Knowledge Ecology International. 2013. KEI Analysis of Wikileaks Leak of TPP IPR Text, From August 2013, November 13.
Lee, T. B. 2013. Here’s Why Obama Trade Negotiators Push the Interests of Hollywood and Drug Companies, Washington Post, November 26.
Lee, D. 2015a. KORUS FTA and Copyright Protection in Korea. In Intellectual Property and Free Trade Agreements in the Asia Pacific Region, ed. C. Antons and R. Hilty. Heidelberg: Springer.
Lee, T. B. 2015b. The Trans-Pacific Partnership Is Great for Elites. Is It Good for Anyone Else? Vox, April 17.
Lim, C. L., D. Elms, and P. Low. 2012. The Trans-Pacific Partnership: A Quest for a 21st Century Trade Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McJohn, S. 2009. Intellectual Property: Examples & Explanations. New York: Aspen Publishers.
NBS. 2014. China National Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China’s National Bureau of Statistics.
Office of the United States Trade Representative. 2015. USTR Releases Annual Special 301 Report on Intellectual Property Rights. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2015/april/ustr-releases-annual-special-301. Accessed June 2015.
Pomfret, R. 2011. Regionalism in East Asia: Why Has It Flourished Since 2000 and How Far Will It Go. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
Rimmer, M. 2013. Plain Packaging for the Pacific Rim: The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Tobacco Control. In Trade Liberalisation and International Cooperation: A Legal Analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, ed. Voon, Tania, 75–105. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Rimmer, M. 2015. Just Label It: Consumer Rights, GM Food Labeling and International Trade. In Intellectual Property and Genetically Modified Organisms: A Convergence in Laws, ed. C. Lawson and B. Charnley. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
Schott, J., B. Kotschwar, and J. Muir. 2013. Understanding the Transpacific Partnership. Washington: Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Shih, G. 2015. China’s Huawei Leads International Patent Filings: WIPO, Reuters, March 19.
Singapore Government. 2014. ASEAN Intellectual Property Enhanced with New Initiatives. https://www.ipos.gov.sg/MediaEvents/Readnews/tabid/873/articleid/282/category/Press%20Releases/parentId/80/year/2014/Default.aspx. Accessed June 2015.
Solis, M. 2013. The Containment Fallacy: China and the TPP, Brooking Institute, May 24.
Stiglitz, J. 2013. Joe Stiglitz Writes Open Letter to TPP Negotiators, December 6.
Sutton, M. 2015. Massive Coalition of Japanese Organizations Campaigns Against TPP Copyright Provisions, Electronic Frontier Foundation, March 17.
Thomson Reuters. 2014. Analysis Shows China’s Patent Dominance Despite Stagnant Foreign Innovation Investment, December 8.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 2012. Intellectual Property and the U.S. Economy: Industries in Focus, Prepared by the Economics and Statistics Administration and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, March.
Wallach, L. 2012. NAFTA on Steroids. The Nation, June 27.
Weatherall, K. 2015. Provocation and Challenges Concerning Enforcement and Civil Procedure in IP. In Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles, ed. G. Dinwoodie. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Wu, T. 2006. Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Decentralized Decisions. Virginia Law Review 92(1): 123–147.
Yu, P. K. 2007a. Intellectual Property, Economic Development, and the China Puzzle. In Intellectual Property, Trade and Development: Strategies to Optimize Economic Development in a TRIPS Plus Era, ed. Daniel J. Gervais, 169–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yu, P. K. 2007b. The US-China Dispute Over TRIPS Enforcement, 44 p.
Yu, P. K. 2007c. International Enclosure, the Regime Complex, and Intellectual Property Schizophrenia. Michigan State Law Review 1: 1–33.
Yu, P.K. 2011. Sinic Trade Agreements. UC Davis Law Review 44: 953–1028.
Yu, P.K. 2013. TPP and Trans-Pacific Perplexities. Fordham International Journal 37: 1129.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duhamel, F., Bringas, R. (2016). Impact of Trans-Pacific Partnership’s Intellectual Property Rights Issues for Mexico and China. In: Cui, S., Pérez García, M. (eds) China and Latin America in Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54080-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54080-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-54691-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-54080-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)