Skip to main content

Impact of Trans-Pacific Partnership’s Intellectual Property Rights Issues for Mexico and China

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
China and Latin America in Transition

Abstract

The general question explored in this chapter deals with the implications of intellectual property provisions of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) on Mexico and China’s business interests and economic relations. We show in this chapter that Mexico will follow the TPP’s intellectual property rights (IPR) provisions set by the United States. China, because of its economic might has more options to follow, even though a close association with the United States still remains one of its best strategies. In the first part of this chapter, we explore the guiding principles that motivate the main negotiator of the treaty, the country that intends to write the rules related to IPR, that is, the United States. In the second part, we look at Mexico’s and China’s positions in this regard. In the third part, we highlight points of convergence and divergence between both countries in their respective IPR policies. In the conclusion, we draw some implications in terms of business and policy in the perspective of TPP’s IPR provisions for Mexico and China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Band, J. and J. Gerafi. 2013. Foreign Ownership of Firms in IP-Intensive Industries. http://infojustice.org/archives/28840. Accessed June 2015.

  • Bringas, R. 2013. Negocios y política en América latina, riesgo político como factor imponderable para los inversionistas. European Scientific Journal 9(4): 158–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookman, A. 2014. Trade Mark Law: Protection, Enforcement, and Licensing. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, D. 1999. Patent and Trademark: Tactics and Practice. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, M., and B. Tomli. 2002. The Making of NAFTA: How the Deal Was Done. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, K.L. 2014. The Intellectual Property Chapter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement and Investment in Developing Nations. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 35(4): 1045–1059.

    Google Scholar 

  • De La Mora, L.M. 2013. México en el acuerdo Estratégico Transpacífico de Asociación Económica. CIDE, 38 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • De La Parra Trujillo, E. 2006. Comentarios a las reformas a la ley federal de derechos de autor. Revista Mexicana de derecho privado, año III 8: 95–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePillis, L. 2013. Everything you need to know about the trans pacific partnership. The Washington Post, December 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhamel, F., and D. Bank. 2013. México como plataforma para las inversiones directas chinas? China, América latina y el Caribe: condiciones y retos en el siglo XXI. Publicaciones UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel Peters, E. 2008. The Impact of China’s Global Economic Expansion on Latin America. World Economy & Finance Research Programme, Working Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel Peters, E. 2012a. The Auto Parts-Automotive Chain in Mexico and China: Co-operation Potential? The China Quarterly 209: 82–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel Peters, E. 2012b. Agenda Económico-comercial. en Agenda Estratégica México-China. Agendasia, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel Peters, E., and K.P. Gallagher. 2013. NAFTA’s Uninvited Guest: China and the Disintegration of North American Trade. Cepal Review 110: 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edsall, T.B. 2014. Free Trade Disagreement. New York Times, February 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Economista. 2014. Canacintra apuesta por Acuerdo de Asociación Transpacífico, October 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, S. 2012. The intellectual property chapter in the TPP. In The Trans-Pacific Partnership, ed. C.L. Lim, D. Elms, and P. Low. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, J. 2012. Inconsistencies Between the TPP and U.S. Law, Public Knowledge. https://www.publicknowledge.org/files/Jodie’s%20analysis.pdf. Accessed June 2015.

  • Gueorguiev, D. D., and M. E. Lovely. 2014. The Trans-Pacific Partnership: Perspectives from China, Prepared for: Challenges Facing the World Trade System, Columbia University (September 30, 2014), 32 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, B. 2013. The Fight Over Digital Rights: The Politics of Copyright and Technology. New York: University of Cambridge Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Highlander, S. 2006. Patent Law. In Research Administration and Management, ed. E. Kulakowski and L. Chronister. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornbeck, J. 2012. The U.S.-Panama Free Trade Agreement, Congressional Research Service, RL32540.

    Google Scholar 

  • IbisWorld. 2015. Market Research Reports, China Industry Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEGI. 2015. Anuario estadístico y geográfico de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos 2014, Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.

    Google Scholar 

  • Infojustice. 2012. TPP-ACTA Comparison Table, v. 2.0. http://infojustice.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/TPP-TRIPS-ACTA-Chile-FTA-Comparison-Table.pdf. Accessed June 2015.

  • Kinsella, N.S. 2001. Against Intellectual Property. Journal of Libertarian Studies 15(2): 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSIDE U.S. TRADE. 2012. Mexico Stresses It Will Be a Full TPP Partner, Despite Terms of Entry, June 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowledge Ecology International. 2013. KEI Analysis of Wikileaks Leak of TPP IPR Text, From August 2013, November 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. B. 2013. Here’s Why Obama Trade Negotiators Push the Interests of Hollywood and Drug Companies, Washington Post, November 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. 2015a. KORUS FTA and Copyright Protection in Korea. In Intellectual Property and Free Trade Agreements in the Asia Pacific Region, ed. C. Antons and R. Hilty. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. B. 2015b. The Trans-Pacific Partnership Is Great for Elites. Is It Good for Anyone Else? Vox, April 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. L., D. Elms, and P. Low. 2012. The Trans-Pacific Partnership: A Quest for a 21st Century Trade Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McJohn, S. 2009. Intellectual Property: Examples & Explanations. New York: Aspen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • NBS. 2014. China National Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China’s National Bureau of Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the United States Trade Representative. 2015. USTR Releases Annual Special 301 Report on Intellectual Property Rights. https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/press-releases/2015/april/ustr-releases-annual-special-301. Accessed June 2015.

  • Pomfret, R. 2011. Regionalism in East Asia: Why Has It Flourished Since 2000 and How Far Will It Go. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimmer, M. 2013. Plain Packaging for the Pacific Rim: The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Tobacco Control. In Trade Liberalisation and International Cooperation: A Legal Analysis of the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, ed. Voon, Tania, 75–105. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimmer, M. 2015. Just Label It: Consumer Rights, GM Food Labeling and International Trade. In Intellectual Property and Genetically Modified Organisms: A Convergence in Laws, ed. C. Lawson and B. Charnley. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott, J., B. Kotschwar, and J. Muir. 2013. Understanding the Transpacific Partnership. Washington: Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, G. 2015. China’s Huawei Leads International Patent Filings: WIPO, Reuters, March 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Government. 2014. ASEAN Intellectual Property Enhanced with New Initiatives. https://www.ipos.gov.sg/MediaEvents/Readnews/tabid/873/articleid/282/category/Press%20Releases/parentId/80/year/2014/Default.aspx. Accessed June 2015.

  • Solis, M. 2013. The Containment Fallacy: China and the TPP, Brooking Institute, May 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. 2013. Joe Stiglitz Writes Open Letter to TPP Negotiators, December 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, M. 2015. Massive Coalition of Japanese Organizations Campaigns Against TPP Copyright Provisions, Electronic Frontier Foundation, March 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson Reuters. 2014. Analysis Shows China’s Patent Dominance Despite Stagnant Foreign Innovation Investment, December 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. 2012. Intellectual Property and the U.S. Economy: Industries in Focus, Prepared by the Economics and Statistics Administration and the United States Patent and Trademark Office, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallach, L. 2012. NAFTA on Steroids. The Nation, June 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherall, K. 2015. Provocation and Challenges Concerning Enforcement and Civil Procedure in IP. In Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles, ed. G. Dinwoodie. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T. 2006. Intellectual Property, Innovation, and Decentralized Decisions. Virginia Law Review 92(1): 123–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P. K. 2007a. Intellectual Property, Economic Development, and the China Puzzle. In Intellectual Property, Trade and Development: Strategies to Optimize Economic Development in a TRIPS Plus Era, ed. Daniel J. Gervais, 169–216. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P. K. 2007b. The US-China Dispute Over TRIPS Enforcement, 44 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P. K. 2007c. International Enclosure, the Regime Complex, and Intellectual Property Schizophrenia. Michigan State Law Review 1: 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.K. 2011. Sinic Trade Agreements. UC Davis Law Review 44: 953–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.K. 2013. TPP and Trans-Pacific Perplexities. Fordham International Journal 37: 1129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duhamel, F., Bringas, R. (2016). Impact of Trans-Pacific Partnership’s Intellectual Property Rights Issues for Mexico and China. In: Cui, S., Pérez García, M. (eds) China and Latin America in Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54080-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics