Skip to main content
  • 799 Accesses

Abstract

The threat of vengeance is the ever-present backdrop to the mimetic theory of religion. “In the final analysis,” affirms René Girard, “the sole purpose of religion is to prevent the recurrence of reciprocal violence.” In this article, we successively examine three different approaches to limiting the scope of reciprocal violence: preventing vengeance outright (the logic of sacrifice); prescribing and regulating vengeance (the vindicatory system); and escaping vengeance by establishing relations of positive reciprocity (the logic of the gift).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Further Reading

  • Anspach, Mark R. “Violence Against Violence: Islam in Comparative Context.” In Violence and the Sacred in the Modern World, edited by Mark Juergensmeyer, 9–29. London: Frank Cass, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. ed. Vengeance. Special issue, Stanford French Review (vol. 16, no. 1), 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Vengeance in Reverse: The Tangled Loops of Violence, Myth, and Madness. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clastres, Pierre. Archeology of Violence. New edition. Translated by Jeanine Herman. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuy, Jean-Pierre. “Totalization and Misrecognition.” Translated by Mark R. Anspach. In Violence and Truth: On the Work of René Girard, edited by Paul Dumouchel, 75–100. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, Susan. Wild Justice: The Evolution of Revenge. New York: Harper & Row, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Revised edition. Translated by James Harle Bell, John Richard von Sturmer, and Rodney Needham. Boston: Beacon Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, Marcel. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Translated by W. D. Halls. New York: W. W. Norton, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scubla, Lucien. “Vindicatory System, Sacrificial System: From Opposition to Reconciliation.” Stanford French Review 16.1 (1992): 55–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonse, Simon. Kings of Disaster: Dualism, Centralism and the Scapegoat King in Southeastern Sudan. Revised edition. Kampala: Fountain Publishers, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anspach, M.R. (2017). Vengeance and the Gift. In: Alison, J., Palaver, W. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Mimetic Theory and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53825-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics