Skip to main content

The Precipice of Myth: Mythology/Epistemology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Myth and Narrative in International Politics
  • 1028 Accesses

Abstract

Cooke strives to comprehend the limits and possibilities of the mythographical approach to knowledge production but undercuts questions of methodology through exploration of the metatheoretical conditions of possibility of a mythographical approach. As such, this is an ontological enquiry to an epistemological aporia. Highlighting how myths are understood in terms of the dichotomy mythos/logos, and thereby constituted as ‘the Other’ of logocentric metaphysics, he conducts a deconstructive reading of previous mythographic approaches. Drawing parallels between Dvora Yanow’s incommensurable values and Derridean différance, Cooke argues that ‘to know’ is itself a myth, enabling the potential expansion of myth analysis to all forms of knowledge. This chapter stages a necessary intervention for those who seek to better comprehend myth on its own terms, putting mythography ‘on edge’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On different types of myth concepts, see Bliesemann de Guevara (Chap. 2) and Münch (Chap. 3).

  2. 2.

    On Lévi-Strauss see in detail Goetze (Chaps. 5 and 7).

  3. 3.

    See also Yanow (foreword) and Münch (Chap. 3).

  4. 4.

    On Horkheimer and Adorno, see Bliesemann de Guevara (Chap. 2).

Bibliography

  • Barthes, R. (1991). Mythologies. New York: Noonday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blass, A. (2005). Translator’s introduction. In J. Derrida (Ed.), Writing and difference (pp. ix–xxiii). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. (2002). The inner reaches of outer space: Metaphor as myth and as religion. Novato, CA: New World Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus, A. (2005). The myth of Sisyphus. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupe, L. (2009). Myth: The new critical idiom. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1974). White mythology: Metaphor in the text of philosophy. New Literary History, 6, 5–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1985). Letter to a Japanese Friend. (Prof. Izutsu). In D. Wood & R. Bernasconi (Eds.), Derrida and Différance (pp. 1–5). Warwick: Parousia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1992). The other heading. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1997). Of grammatology. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2004). Dissemination. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (2005). Writing and difference. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (2002). Dialectic of enlightenment: Philosophical fragments. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huskey, R. (2009). Paul Ricœur on hope: Expecting the good. Oxford: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1970). The raw and the cooked. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1971). On Truth and Lie in an Extra-Moral Sense. In W. Kaufmann (Ed.), The portable Nietzsche. London: Chatto and Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1973). Phaedrus & letters VII and VIII. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1965). History and truth. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1967). The symbolism of evil. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1991). A Ricœur reader: Reflection and imagination. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (2003). The rule of metaphor. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (2006). Memory, history, forgetting. London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms, K. (2003). Paul Ricœur. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, A. (2011). Derrida, myth and the impossibility of philosophy. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G. (1997). Translator’s preface. In J. Derrida (Ed.), Of grammatology (pp. ix–lxxxviii). London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E. (1991). Between suspicion and hope: Paul Ricœur’s vital hermeneutic. Journal of Literature and Theology, 5, 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. (1988). Keywords. London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, D. (1992). Silences in public policy discourse: Organizational and policy myths. Journal of Public Administration, 2, 399–423.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cooke, R. (2016). The Precipice of Myth: Mythology/Epistemology. In: Bliesemann de Guevara, B. (eds) Myth and Narrative in International Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53752-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics