Skip to main content

Action Research in Blended Environments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Blending Technologies in Second Language Classrooms
  • 829 Accesses

Abstract

Action research is a cyclical study by instructors in blended learning practice aimed at making an improvement. Critics charge that action research has weak methodology, lacks rigor, and is self-referential. Proponents respond by defending the paradigm as an externally valid form of socially situated investigation. Action research differs from positivist, scientific forms of research in four ways:

  • Epistemology: Knowledge develops from a reflective stance, not an objective one;

  • Positionality: The researchers are personally involved, giving insider views;

  • Inference: The process is continuous over multiple cycles of intervention;

  • Validity: Trustworthiness is established through triangulation.

In this chapter, Hinkelman outlines three longitudinal cases of action research in blended environments and expands the implementation stages to ten steps, including stages to institutionalize and make inventions more sustainable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A. (2005). Action research: An evolving paradigm? Language Teaching, 38(2), 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A. (2009). Action research in second language teacher education. In A. Burns & J. Richards (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp. 289–297). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2001). Doing action research in your own organization. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, P. J. M. (2003). Action research. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, P. J. M. (2011). Effective action research: Developing reflective thinking and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, D. (2002). What counts as action in educational action research? Educational Action Research, 10(2), 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana, N. F., & Yendol-Silva, D. (2003). The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher research: From enquiry to understanding. Boston: Heinle and Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, D., & Jonson, K. E. (2005). Toward linking teacher knowledge and student learning. In D. Tedick (Ed.), Second language teacher education: International perspectives (pp. 75–94). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, G. (1991). Collective time—Collective practice? Curriculum Journal, 2, 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herr, K., & Anderson, G. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Herr, K., & Anderson, G. (2014). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1992). The action research planner (3rd ed.). Geelong: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., & Nunes, J. (2004). Developing innovation in online learning: An action research framework. London: Routledge Falmer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, D. (2001). Action research in language education. In D. Hall & A. Hewings (Eds.), Innovation in English language teaching (pp. 197–207). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunan, D., & Bailey, K. M. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research: A comprehensive guide. Boston: Heinle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbach, E. M. (2003). Value and validity in action research: A guidebook for reflective practitioners. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L. (2007). Human-machine reconfigurations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hinkelman, D. (2018). Action Research in Blended Environments. In: Blending Technologies in Second Language Classrooms. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53686-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53686-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53685-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53686-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics