Skip to main content

Managing the Reins of Inquiry: The Role of the Teacher in IBL

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning across Disciplines

Abstract

The Future Problem Solving (FPS) Program is used as a case study that explores the ways in which a teacher/coach contributes to the effective inquiry-based education of a student. A high degree of expertise on the part of the teacher/coach is essential for successful inquiry-based learning to take place in the classroom. The inquiry literate teacher/coach facilitates the development of the students’ inquiry literacy through three process phases (the exploratory, the evidence gathering and the sense making), whilst undertaking seven distinct teaching/coaching roles (direct instructor, facilitate interpretation, discussion facilitator, mentor, organiser, questioner and logistics organiser). The role of Information Communication Technology on the teacher role of data selection is explored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Assay, L. D., & Orgill, M. (2010). Analysis of essential features of inquiry found in articles published in the science teacher, 1998–2007. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(1), 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casinader, N. (1995). Challenging the thinking process: The future problem solving program. Unicorn, 21(1), 56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casinader, N. (1999). Education for the new millennium: The future problem solving program in Australia. Learning Matters, 4(1), 48–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casinader, N. (2014). Culture, transnational education and thinking: Case studies in global schooling. Milton Park, Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabbe, A. B. (1989). The future problem solving program. Educational Leadership, 47(1), 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Future Problem Solving Program Australia. (2008). Coaching guide Australian version: 7th Edition (7th ed.). Melbourne: Future Problem Solving Program Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Future Problem Solving Program Australia (Producer). (2014). The future problem solving program. [introductory video].

    Google Scholar 

  • Future Problem Solving Program Australia. (2015). Evaluator handbook (7th ed.). Melbourne: Future Problem Solving Program Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Future Problem Solving Program International. (2017a). Affiliate Directory. Retrieved from http://www.fpspi.org/FindAD.html.

  • Future Problem Solving Program International. (2017b). Welcome. Retrieved from http://www.fpspi.org/index.html.

  • Future Problem Solving Program International (FPSPI). (2016a). Coach’s handbook. Melbourne: Future Problem Solving Program International (FPSPI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Future Problem Solving Program International (FPSPI). (2016b). Evaluation guidelines for community problem solving 2016–2017. Melbourne: Future Problem Solving Program International (FPSPI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Future Problem Solving Program International (FPSPI). (2016c). Evaluation guidelines for global issues problem solving 2016–2017. Melbourne: Future Problem Solving Program International (FPSPI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidman, G. C. (2016). Extending the gifted science student: What the teacher needs to know during enquiry based teaching. In K. S. Taber & M. Sumida (Eds.), International perspectives on science education for the gifted: Key issues and challenges. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Studies Authority (QSA). (2004). Biology senior syllabus 2004 (amended 2006 and 2014). Brisbane: Queensland Studies Authority (QSA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogalla, M., & Margison, J. (2004). Future problem solving program coaches’ efficacy inteaching for successful intelligence and their patterns of successful behavior. Roeper Review, 26(3), 175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volk, V. J. (2003). Confidence building and problem solving skills: An investigation into the impact of the future problem solving program on secondary school students’ sense of self-efficacy in problem solving, in research, in team work and in coping with the future. PhD unpublished doctoral thesis, University of New South Wales‚ Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C. & Shore, B. (2015). Understanding classroom roles in inquiry Education: Linking role theory and social constructivism to the concept of role diversification. Sage Open 5(4), 1-13.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gillian Kidman .

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kidman, G., Casinader, N. (2017). Managing the Reins of Inquiry: The Role of the Teacher in IBL. In: Inquiry-Based Teaching and Learning across Disciplines. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53463-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53463-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-53462-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-53463-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics