Skip to main content

Imperative 3(Continued): Understand that Customers’ Minds Can Be in Conflict with Themselves

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Intuitive Customer
  • 1911 Accesses

Abstract

We have explained that thinking needs to change about how emotions relate to business and customer behavior. We have explained why customers are not rational beings, but instead human beings that make their decisions emotionally and then justify them rationally. We have asked you to embrace the irrationality all customers have. We have just shown you how the Intuitive System and the Rational System are different from each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Freud, Sigmund, and James Strachey. The Ego and the Id. New York: Norton, 1962. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Frederick, Shane. “Cognitive Reflection and Decision-Making.” Journal of Economic Perspectives. 19(4). (Fall 2005): 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lowe, Lindsay. “10 Memorable Pope Francis Quotes: ‘Who Am I To Judge?”’ Parade.com. 13 March 2014. Web. 18 October 2015. http://parade.com/259100/linzlowe/10-memorable-pope-francis-quotes-who-am-i-to-judge/.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson, Timothy D., Douglas J. Lisle, Johnathan w. Schooler, Sara D. Hodges, Kristen J. Kaaren, and Suzanne J. LaFleur. “Introspecting About Reasons Can Reduce Post-Choice Satisfaction.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 19 (1993): 331–339.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jones, Thomas M. “Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-contingent Model.” Academy of management review 16(2). (1991): 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Henrich, Joseph. “Animal Behaviour (Communication Arising): Inequity Aversion in Capuchins?” Nature 428(6979). (2004): 139.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mortowitz, Vicky G., Eric Johnson, and David Schmittlein. “Does Measuring Intent Change Behavior?” The Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1). (1993): 46–61. http://implicit.rice.edu/documents/Morwitz%20Johnson%20and%20Schmittlein%20JCR%201993.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, Maggie. “11 Psychological Tricks Restaurants Use to Make You Spend More Money.” www.businessinsider.com. 14 July 2014. Web. 5 September 2014. http://www.businessinsider.com/restaurant-menus-spend-more-money-2014–7?utm_content=buffer8d662&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tversky, Amos et al. “Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science, New Series, 185(4157). (27 September 1974): 1124–1131 http://psiexp.ss.uci.edu/research/teaching/Tversky_Kahneman_1974.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shaw, C., Hamilton, R. (2016). Imperative 3(Continued): Understand that Customers’ Minds Can Be in Conflict with Themselves. In: The Intuitive Customer. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-53430-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics