Textbook Practices: Reading Texts, Touching Books

  • Georg Kolbeck
  • Tobias Röhl
Chapter

Abstract

Drawing on practice theory, a programme of research is delineated that focuses on textbook practices. Textbooks and their textual content are seen as materially shaped textual artefacts that are adapted, transformed, contested, subverted, or may even be banned from the classroom. Mapping qualitative research that deals with the use of textbooks, two shifts denoting an increasing recognition of practices in textbook research are identified: a shift from static content to dynamic texts in use and a shift from written language to the material artefact itself. The chapter concludes by outlining possibilities for further research on textbook practices.

References

  1. Abraham, J. (1989). Teacher Ideology and Sex Roles in Curriculum Texts. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 10(1), 33–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlrichs, J., Baier, K., Christophe, B., Macgilchrist, F., Mielke, P., & Richtera, R. (2015). Memory Practices. On Reproducing, Destabilizing and Interrupting Majority Memories. Journal of Educational Media, Memory, and Society, 7(2), 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Assmann, J. (1994). Ancient Egypt and the Materiality of the Sign. In H. U. Gumbrecht & K. L. Pfeiffer (Eds.), Materialities of Communication (pp. 15–31). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Attenborough, F. T. (2011). “I don’t f***ing care!” Marginalia and the (Textual) Negotiation of an Academic Identity by University Students. Discourse & Communication, 5(2), 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the Book: What Is or Might Be the Role of Curriculum Materials in Teacher Learning and Instructional Reform? Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–14.Google Scholar
  6. Barthes, R. (1975). The Pleasure of the Text. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  7. Bernhardt, M., & Friedburg, C. (2014). “Digital” vs. “Analog”? Zeitschrift für Geschichtsdidaktik, 13(1), 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2009). Visualizing English: A Social Semiotic History of a School Subject. Visual Communication, 8(3), 247–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, M. (2009). The Teacher-Tool Relationship: Theorizing the Design and Use of Curriculum Materials. In J. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics Teachers at Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction (pp. 17–36). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Cronbach, L. J. (1955). The Text in Use. In L. J. Cronbach (Ed.), Text Materials in Modern Education (pp. 188–216). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  11. Engert, K., & Krey, B. (2013). Das lesende Schreiben und das schreibende Lesen: Zur epistemischen Arbeit an und mit wissenschaftlichen Texten. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 42(5), 366–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2007). Representation of Problem-Solving Procedures: A Comparative Look at China, Singapore, and US Mathematics Textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-Network Theory in Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Freeman, D. J., & Porter, A. C. (1989). Do Textbooks Dictate the Content of Mathematics Instruction in Elementary Schools? American Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuchs, E. (2011). Aktuelle Entwicklungen der schulbuchbezogenen Forschung in Europa. Bildung und Erziehung, 64(1), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fuchs, E., Niehaus, I., & Stoletzki, A. (2014). Das Schulbuch in der Forschung: Analysen und Empfehlungen für die Bildungspraxis. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gudmundsdottir, S. (1991). Story-Maker, Story-Teller: Narrative Structures in Curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(3), 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall, S. (1996). Encoding/Decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, D. A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, Media, Language (pp. 128–138). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Heer, N. (2011). Das Schulbuch als textlinguistischer Analysegegenstand. In M. Foschi Albert, M. Hepp, E. Neuland, & M. Dalmas (Eds.), Texte unter sprachvergleichender und kulturkontrastiver Perspektive: Wege der akademischen Kooperation mit dem Ziel einer interkulturellen Germanistik (pp. 471–481). Munich: Iudicium.Google Scholar
  20. Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A. (2007). From Intended Curriculum to Written Curriculum: Examining the “Voice” of a Mathematics Textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(4), 344–369.Google Scholar
  21. Hintz, K. (2014). “A Better Vision of What Social Studies Can Be”: How Elementary Teachers’ Philosophies Influence Their Use of the History Alive! Textbook. Theory & Research in Social Education, 42(1), 96–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hodge, R., & Kress, G. (1988). Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  23. Horsley, M. (2002). New Studies Conducted by the Teaching Resources and Textbook Research Unit. In J. Mikk, V. Meisalo, H. Kukemik, & M. Horsley (Eds.), Learning and Educational Media. The 3rd IARTEM Volume (pp. 11–29). Tartu: Tartu University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Horsley, M., & Walker, R. (2005). Textbook Pedagogy: A Sociocultural Analysis. In M. Horsley, S. V. Knudsen, & S. Selander (Eds.), Has Past Passed? Textbooks and Educational Media for the 21st Century. The 7th IARTEM Volume (pp. 47–69). Stockholm: HLS.Google Scholar
  25. Khamsi, K., & Han, C. (2014). The Portrayal of the Japanese Occupation in Singaporean Textbook Narratives. In P. Morris, E. Vickers, & N. Shimazu (Eds.), Imagining Japan in Post-War East Asia: Identity Politics, Schooling and Popular Culture (pp. 210–228). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Knight, B. A. (2015). Teachers’ Use of Textbooks in the Digital Age. Cogent Education, 2(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krämer, S. (2003). Writing, Notational Iconicity, Calculus: On Writing as a Cultural Technique. Modern Language Notes – German Issue, 118(3), 518–537.Google Scholar
  28. Lambert, D. (1999). Exploring the Use of Textbooks in Key Stage 3 Geography Classrooms: A Small-Scale Study. The Curriculum Journal, 10(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Law, J. (2007). Pinboards and Books: Juxtaposing, Learning and Materiality. In D. W. Kritt & L. Winegar (Eds.), Education and Technology: Critical Perspectives, Possible Futures (pp. 125–149). Plymouth: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  31. Lithner, J. (2003). Students’ Mathematical Reasoning in University Textbook Exercises. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52(1), 29–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lubben, F., Campbell, B., Kasanda, C., Kapenda, H., Gaoseb, N., & Kandjeo-Marenga, U. (2003). Teachers’ Use of Textbooks: Practice in Namibian Science Classrooms. Educational Studies, 29(2–3), 109–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Macgilchrist, F. (2012a). E-Schulbücher, iPads und, Interpassivität: Reflexionen über neue schulische Bildungsmedien und deren Subjektivationspotential. Bildungsforschung, 9(1), 180–204.Google Scholar
  34. Macgilchrist, F. (2012b). Global Subjects: Exploring Subjectivation Through Ethnography of Media Production. Pragmatics, 22(3), 417–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Matthes, E. (2014). Aktuelle Tendenzen der Schulbuch- bzw. der Bildungsforschung. In D. Wrobel & A. Müller (Eds.), Bildungsmedien für den Deutschunterricht: Vielfalt – Entwicklungen – Herausforderungen (pp. 17–26). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.Google Scholar
  36. Mohn, E., & Amann, K. (2006). Lernkörper. Kamera-ethnographische Studien zum Schülerjob. Begleitpublikation zur DVD-Video C 13 032. Tübingen: IWF Wissen und Medien.Google Scholar
  37. Nicol, C. C., & Crespo, S. M. (2006). Learning to Teach with Mathematics Textbooks: How Preservice Teachers interpret and Use Curriculum Materials. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62(3), 331–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Hare, S., & Smith, J. M. (2012). The Customer Is Always Right? Resistance from College Students to E-Books as Textbooks. Kansas Library Association College and University Libraries Section Proceedings, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4148/culs.v2i0.1615.
  39. Pepin, B., & Haggarty, L. (2001). Mathematics Textbooks and Their Use in English, French and German Classrooms. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 33(5), 158–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Phillips, B. J., & Phillips, F. (2007). Sink or Skim: Textbook Reading Behaviors of Introductory Accounting Students. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(1), 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pingel, F. (2009). UNESCO Guidebook on Textbook Research and Textbook Revision. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  42. Reckwitz, A. (2002). Towards a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers’ Use of Mathematics Curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Repoussi, M., & Tutiaux-Guillon, N. (2010). New Trends in History Textbook Research: Issues and Methodologies Toward a School Historiography. Journal of Educational Media, Memory and, Society, 2(1), 154–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rezat, S. (2012). Interactions of Teachers’ and Students’ Use of Mathematics Textbooks. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From Text to “Lived” Resources (pp. 231–245). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  46. Rezat, S. (2013). The Textbook-In-Use: Students’ Utilization Schemes of Mathematics Textbooks Related to Self-Regulated Practicing. ZDM, 45(5), 659–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rockwell, E. (2006). La lecture scolaire comme pratique culturelle: Concepts pour l’étude de l’usage des manuels. Education et sociétés, 17(1), 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sharrock, W., & Ikeya, N. (2000). Instructional Matter: Readable Properties of an Introductory Text in Matrix Algebra. In S. Hester & D. Francis (Eds.), Local Educational Order: Ethnomethodological Studies of Knowledge in Action (pp. 271–289). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sikorová, Z., & Cervenková, I. (2014). Styles of Textbook Use. The New Educational Review, 35(1), 112–122.Google Scholar
  50. Sosniak, L. A., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1993). Teachers and Textbooks: Materials Use in Four Fourth-Grade Classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 93(3), 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sunderland, J., Cowley, M., Abdul Rahim, F., Leontzakou, C., & Shattuck, J. (2001). From Bias “In the Text” to “Teacher Talk Around the Text”: An Exploration of Teacher Discourse and Gendered Foreign Language Textbook Texts. Linguistics and Education, 11(3), 251–286.Google Scholar
  52. Taylor, M. W. (2013). Replacing the “Teacher-Proof” Curriculum with the “Curriculum-Proof” Teacher: Toward More Effective Interactions with Mathematics Textbooks. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(3), 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Torsti, P. (2007). How to Deal with a Difficult Past? History Textbooks Supporting Enemy Images in Post-War Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 39(1), 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Towards a Semiotics of Typography. Information Design Journal, 14(2), 139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Vom Hau, M. (2009). Unpacking the School: Textbooks, Teachers, and the Construction of Nationhood in Mexico, Argentina, and Peru. Latin American Research Review, 44(3), 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Waltz, S. B. (2006). Nonhumans Unbound: Actor-Network Theory and the Reconsideration of “Things” in Educational Foundations. Educational Foundations, 20(3–4), 51–68.Google Scholar
  57. Weinberg, A., & Wiesner, E. (2011). Understanding Mathematics Textbooks Through Reader-Oriented Theory. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 76(1), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georg Kolbeck
    • 1
  • Tobias Röhl
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of MainzMainzGermany
  2. 2.Department of Social SciencesUniversity of SiegenSiegenGermany

Personalised recommendations