Advertisement

On Normativity and Absence: Representation of LGBTI* in Textbook Research

  • Marek Sancho Höhne
  • Dmitri Heerdegen
Chapter

Abstract

The authors examine in this chapter how LGBTI* (lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans*, and inter*) is considered in textbook research, analysing the relevant studies with regard to the conceptualisations of LGBTI* and the methods employed in those studies. The main focus of this chapter are the insufficiencies in present textbook research on LGBTI*, which starts with the subsumption of non-normative genders and sexualities under the umbrella term ‘LGBTI*’ and which more often than not results in inconsistent terminology. The authors of this chapter suggest to focus on intersectionalities of identifications and—in conjunction—to employ less standardised, more open methods when studying this subject, that is, researching normativities instead of the absence of LGBTI* in textbooks.

References

  1. Apple, M. W. (2000). Official Knowledge: Democratic Education in a Conservative Age. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). Discourse in the Novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The Dialogic Imagination (pp. 259–422). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bazzul, J., & Sykes, H. (2011). The Secret Identity of a Biology Textbook: Straight and Naturally Sexed. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6(2), 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bittner, M. (2011, April). Geschlechterkonstruktionen und die Darstellung von Lesben, Schwulen, Bisexuellen, Trans* und Inter* (LSBTI) in Schulbüchern. Eine gleichstellungsorientierte Analyse, Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft. http://www.gew-publikationen.de/uploads/tx_picdlcarousel/Schulbuchanalyse_01.pdf
  5. Franzen, J., & Beger, N. J. (2002). “Zwischen die Stühle gefallen” Ein Gespräch über queere Kritik und gelebte Geschlechterentwürfe. In polymorph (Ed.), (K)ein Geschlecht oder viele? Transgender in politischer Perspektive (pp. 53–68). Berlin: Querverlag.Google Scholar
  6. Hawkins, J. (2012). Don’t Ask About and Don’t Tell the Lies My Teacher Told to Me. In H. Hickman & B. J. Porfilio (Eds.), The New Politics of the Textbook: Problematizing the Portrayal of Marginalized Groups in Textbooks (pp. 235–257). Rotterdam, Boston, Taipei: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hickman, H. (2012). Handling Heteronormativity in High School Literature Texts. In H. Hickman & B. J. Porfilio (Eds.), The New Politics of the Textbook: Problematizing the Portrayal of Marginalized Groups in Textbooks (pp. 71–85). Rotterdam, Boston, Taipei: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jochim, V. (2014). “Weil Mädchen anders lernen”—Die Konstruktion von Geschlecht in Grundschulbüchern und ihre heteronormative Wirkmächtigkeit. Eckert. Working Papers 9. www.edumeres.net/urn/urn:nbn:de:0220-2014-00270
  9. Keinz, A. (2010). Der post-emanzipatorische Klappenverfall oder Queering Poland. Berliner Blätter, 54, 63–80.Google Scholar
  10. Lister, R. (2003). Sexual Citizenship. In E. F. Isin & B. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of Citizenship Studies (pp. 191–208). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Pointner, A. (2006). Schule zwischen Vielfalt und Norm(alis)ierung. Eine Analyse von Grundschulbüchern im Sinner einer Pädagogik vielfältiger Lebensweisen. In A. Mörth & B. Hey (Eds.), Geschlecht + Didaktik, Koordinationssstelle für Geschlechterstudien, Frauenforschung und Frauenförderung der Karl-Franzens-Universität. Graz: Grazer Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
  12. Puar, J. (2007). Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Puar, J. (2013). Rethinking Homonationalism. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 45, 336–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Røthing, Å., & Svendsen, S. H. B. (2010). Homotolerance and Heterosexuality as Norwegian Values. Journal of LGBT Youth, 7(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/19361651003799932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Spade, D. (2011). Normal Life: Administrative Violence, Critical Trans Politics, and the Limits of Law. Brooklyn, NY: South End Press.Google Scholar
  16. Temple, J. R. (2005). “People Who Are Different from You”: Heterosexism in Quebec High School Textbooks. Canadian Journal of Education/Revue canadienne de l’éducation, 28(3), 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wilmot, M., & Naidoo, D. (2014). “Keeping Things Straight”: The Representation of Sexualities in Life Orientation Textbooks. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 14(3), 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2014.896252. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wylie, S. S. (2012). Uncovering and Destabilizing Heteronormative Narratives in World History Textbooks. In H. Hickman & B. J. Porfilio (Eds.), The New Politics of the Textbook: Problematizing the Portrayal of Marginalized Groups in Textbooks (pp. 129–148). Rotterdam, Boston, Taipei: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marek Sancho Höhne
    • 1
  • Dmitri Heerdegen
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Social and Cultural Sciences, Cultural and Social Anthropology DepartmentEuropean University ViadrinaFrankfurt (Oder)Germany

Personalised recommendations