Skip to main content

‘The Times They Are a-Changin’. On Time, Space and Periodization in History

Abstract

In this chapter, Lorenz analyzes recent evolutions in the study of historical time and highlights the relationship between history and modernity. First, he addresses Reinhart Koselleck’s idea that ‘exponential acceleration’ is the core of modernity and how this idea informs the ‘presentism’ of Francois Hartog and Hans-Ulrich Gumbrecht. Second, Lorenz focuses on the rise of modernity and history as a discipline and how ‘modern history’ as a period has created all other periods. Third, the connections between modern linear time and space are traced, including its ‘relativization’ since Einstein. Lorenz argues that postmodern and postcolonial ideas have led to a spatial ‘relativization’ of historical time. Fourth, the chapter returns to the issue of periodization in history and its interconnections with constructions of space and identity.

Keywords

  • Nineteenth Century
  • Historical Time
  • Modern History
  • National History
  • Early Modern Period

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-52908-4_6
  • Chapter length: 23 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-1-137-52908-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Akyeampong, E. & others. (2015). AHR Conversation: Explaining Historical Change: Or, The Lost History of Causes. American Historical Review 120, nr. 4, 1369–1423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Algazi, G. (2014). Forget Memory: Some Critical Remarks on Memory, Forgetting and History. In S. Scholz et al. (Eds.), Damnatio in Memoria: Deformation und Gegenkonstruktionen von Geschichte (pp. 25–34). Vienna: Böhlau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assmann, A. (2013). Ist die Zeit aus den Fugen? Aufstieg und Fall des Zeitregimes der Moderne [Is Time Out of Joint? The Rise and Fall of the Modern Regime of Historicty]. Munich: Hanser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bashir, S. (2014, December). On Islamic Time: Rethinking Chronology in the Historiography of Muslim Societies. History and Theory, 53, 519–544.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, U. (2003). Periodisierung [Periodization]. In S. Jordan (Ed.), Lexikon Geschichtswissenschaft. 100 Grundbegriffe (pp. 234–236). Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, J. H. (1996). Cross-Cultural Interaction and Periodization in World History. American Historical Review, 101, 749–770.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S. (2015). The Past as History. National Identity and Historical Consciousness in Modern Europe. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, S., & Lorenz, C. (Eds.). (2010). Nationalizing the Past. Historians as Nation Builders in Modern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevernage, B. (2012). History, Memory, and State-Sponsored Violence: Time and Justice. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevernage, B. (2014). Transitional Justice and Historiography: Challenges, Dilemmas and Possibilities. Macquarie Law Journal, 13, 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevernage, B. (2016). Tales of Pastness and Contemporaneity: On the Politics of Time in History and Anthropology. Rethinking History, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevernage, B., & Lorenz, C. (Eds.). (2013). Breaking Up Time. Negotiating the Borders Between the Present, Past and Future. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaas, P. (2001). Vormgeven aan de tijd. Over periodiseren [Shaping Time. On Periodizing]. In M. Grever & H. Jansen (Eds.), De ongrijpbare tijd. Temporaliteit en de constructie van het verleden [The Elusive Time. Temporality and the Construction of the Past] (pp. 35–49). Hilversum: Verloren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, S. (2013). Time in Early Modern Islam: Calendar, Ceremony, and Chronology in the Safavid, Mughal, and Ottoman Empires. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M. (1992). The Historian’s Craft (P. Putnam, Trans.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böwering, G. (1997, March). The Concept of Time in Islam. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 141(1), 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brendecke, A. (2000). Die Jahrhundertwenden: Eine Geschichte ihrer Wahrnehmung und Wirkungen [The Turns of the Centuries: A History of Their Perception and Effects]. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, J., & Zajde, N. (Eds.). (2011). Holocaust und Trauma. Kritische Perspektiven zur Entstehung und Wirkung eines Paradigmas [Holocaust and Trauma. Critical Perspectives on the Origin and Impact of a Paradigm]. Tel Aviver Jahrbuch für deutsche Geschichte, 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunner, O., Conze, W., & Koselleck, R. (Eds.). (1972). Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland [Basic Concepts in History: A Historical Dictionary of Political and Social Language in Germany] (8 vols.). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D. (1992, Winter). Postcoloniality and the Artifice of History: Who Speaks for “Indian” Pasts. Representations, 37, 1–26.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D. (2000). Provincializing Europe. Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty, D. (2009). The Climate of History: Four Theses. Critical Inquiry, 35(2), 197–222.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Conan, E., & Rousso, H. (1998). Vichy: An Ever-Present Past (N. Bracher, Trans.). Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, S. (1999). What Time Is Japan? Problems of Comparative (Intercultural) Historiography. History and Theory, 38, 67–83.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, S. (2016). What Is Global History? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, F. (2005). Colonialism in Question: Theory, Knowledge, History. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (2008). Periodization and Sovereignty. How Ideas of Feudalism and Secularization Govern the Politics of Time. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, M. (1988). The Writing of History (T. Conley, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dejung, C., & Lengwiler, M. (Eds.). (2016). Ränder der Moderne: Neue Perspektiven auf die Europäische Geschichte (1800–1930) [Margins of Modernity: New Perspectives on European History (1800–1930)]. Cologne: Böhlau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Hollander, J., Paul, H., & Peters, R. (Eds.). (2011). Historical Distance: Reflections on a Metaphor [Theme Issue]. History and Theory, 50(4), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirlik, A. (1999). Is There History after Eurocentrism? Globalism, Postcolonialism, and the Disavowal of History. Cultural Critique, 42(Spring), 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirlik, A. (2005). Performing the World: Reality and Representation in the Making of World History(ies). Bulletin of the German Historical Institute, 37, 9–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirlik, A. (2013). Thinking modernity historically: Is ‘alternative modernity’ the answer? Asian Review of World Histories, 1, 5–44.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Doering-Manteufel, A., & Raphael, L. (2012). Nach dem Boom. Perspektiven auf die Zeitgeschichte seit 1970 (After the Boom. Perspectives on Contemporary History). Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domanska, E. (2014). The New Age of the Anthropocene. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 1(1), 98–103.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Engel, U., & Middell, M. (2005). Bruchzonen der Globalisierung [Fracture Zones of Globalization]. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, F. (2017). Von no future bis Posthistoire. Der Wandel des temporalen Imaginariums nach dem Boom [From No Future to Posthistoire. The Change of the Temporal Imaginarium after the Boom]. In F. Esposito (Ed.), Gezeitenwandel. Transformationen geschichtlicher Zeitlichkeit nach dem Boom [Tidal Change. Transformations of Historical Temporality after the Boom] (in press). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabian, J. (1983). Time and the Other. How Anthropology Makes Its Object. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, P. (2004). Stranded in the Present: Modern Time and the Melancholy of History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallois, W. (2007). Time, Religion and History. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geppert, A., & Kössler, T. (Eds.). (2015). Obsession der Gegenwart. Zeit im 20. Jahrhundert [Obsession of the Present. Time in the Twentieth Century]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, A. (2003). Dating History: The Renaissance & the Reformation of Chronology. Daedalus, 132(2), 74–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, W. A. (1992). Periodization in European and World History. Journal of World History, 3, 13–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, W. A. (1995). Periodizing in World History. History and Theory, 34, 99–111.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gumbrecht, H.-U. (1978). Modern, Modernität, Moderne [Modern, Modernism, Modernity]. In O. Brunner, W. Conze, & R. Koselleck (Eds.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe (Vol. 4, pp. 93–131). Stuttgart: Klett-Cota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumbrecht, H.-U. (2014). Our Broadening Present. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, F. (2015). Regimes of Historicity. Presentism and Experiences of Time. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1990). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, S. (1988). A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. New York, NY: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschler, K., & Savant, S. B. (2014). Introduction—What Is in a Period? Arabic Historiography and Periodization. Der Islam, 91(1), 6–19.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hölscher, L. (1999). Die Entdeckung der Zukunft [The Discovery of the Future]. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölscher, L. (2009). Semantik der Leere. Grenzfragen der Geschichtswissenschaft [Semantics of Emptiness. Borderline Questions of History]. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölscher, L. (2014, December). Time Gardens: Historical Concepts in Modern Historiography. History and Theory, 53(4), 577–559.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, L. (2008). Measuring Time, Making History. Budapest: Central European University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Huyssen, A. (2003). Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, H. (2016, February). In Search of New Times: Temporality in the Enlightenment and Counter-Enlightenment. History and Theory, 55, 66–90.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jordheim, H. (2012). Against Periodization: Koselleck’s Theory of Multiple Temporalities. History and Theory, 51, 151–171.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, T. (2012). Zeitgeist im langen 18. Jahrhundert: Dimensionen eines umstrittenen Begriffs [“Spirit of the Age” in the Long Eighteenth Century. Dimensions of a Contested Concept]. In A. Landwehr (Ed.), Frühe Neue Zeiten: Zeitwissen zwischen Reformation und Revolution [Early Modern Times: Time Knowledge Between Reformation and Revolution] (pp. 319–357). Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. (2000). Thinking Past a Problem: Essays in the History of Ideas. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (2000). Zeitschichten:. Studien zur Historik. [Time Layers. Studies on History]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (Translation: Koselleck, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (2002). The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts (T. Presner, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (2003). Zeit [Time]. In S. Jordan (Ed.), Lexikon Geschichtswissenschaft. 100 Grundbegriffe (pp. 331–336). Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (2004). Futures Past. On the Semantics of Historical Time (K. Tribe, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landwehr, A. (2012). Von der Gleichzeitigkeit des Ungleichzeitigen [On the Simultaneity of the Unsimultaneous]. Historische Zeitschrift, 295, 1–34.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Landwehr, A. (2014). Geburt der Gegenwart: Eine Geschichte der Zeit im 17 Jahrhundert [Birth of the Present: A History of Time in the Seventeenth Century]. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landwehr, A. (2016). Die anwesende Abwesenheit der Vergangenheit. Essay zur Geschichtstheorie [The present absence of the past. An essay on historical theory]. Frankfurt a.M: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Goff, J. (1992). History and Memory (S. Rendall & E. Claman, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Goff, J. (2015). Must We Periodize History into Periods? (M. DeBevoise, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Poidevin, R. (2003). Travels in Four Dimensions: The Enigmas of Space and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Poidevin, R. (2011, Fall). The Experience and Perception of Time. In E. N. Zelta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved January 4, 2016, from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/time-experience

  • Leonard, J. (2011). Erfahrungsgeschichten der Moderne: Von der komparativen Semantik zur Temporalisierung europäischer Sattelzeiten [Histories of the Experience of Modernity. From Comparative Semantics to the Temporalization of European “Sattelzeiten”]. In H. Joas & P. Vogt (Eds.), Begriffene Geschichte. Beiträge zum Werk Reinhart Kosellecks (pp. 423–449). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, C. (2010). Unstuck in Time. Or: The Sudden Presence of the Past. In K. Tilmans, F. van Vree, & J. Winter (Eds.), Performing the Past: Memory, History, and Identity in Modern Europe (pp. 67–105). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, C. (2014). Blurred Lines. History, Memory and the Experience of Time. International Journal for History, Culture and Modernity, 1(2), 43–62.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Löwith, K. (1949). Meaning in History: The Theological Implications of the Philosophy of History. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lübbe, H. (2000). Die Modernität der Vergangenheitszuwendung. Zur Geschichtsphilosophie zivilisatorischer Selbsthistorisierung [The Modernity of the Orientation Towards the Past. On the Philosophy of History of Civilisatory Self-Historicization]. In S. Jordan (Ed.), Zukunft der Geschichte. Historisches Denken an der Schwelle zum 21. Jahrhundert (pp. 26–35). Berlin: Trafo Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, C. (2000). Consigning the Twentieth Century to History: Alternative Narratives for the Modern Era. American Historical Review, 105(3), 807–831.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Michelet, J. (nd). Histoire de la Revolution Française (Vol. 3). Paris, France: Librairie Abel Pilon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandy, A. (1995). History’s Forgotten Doubles. History and Theory, 34, 44–66.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Niethammer, L. (1992). Posthistoire: Has History Come to an End? (P. Camiller, Trans.). London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nipperdey, J. (2015). Die Terminologie von Epochen—Überlegungen am Beispiel Frühe Neuzeit/ “early modern” [The Terminology of Periods—Considerations on the Example of Frühe Neuzeit/Early Modern]. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte, 38, 170–185.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nora, P. (1989). Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations, 26, 7–24.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, V. (2015a). The Global Transformation of Time 1870–1950. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ogle, V. (2015b, October 12). A Briefer History of Time. How the World Adopted a Uniform Conception of Time. Foreign Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olick, J. K. (2007). The Politics of Regret: On Collective Memory and Historical Responsibility. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterhammel, J. (2006). Über die Periodisierung der neueren Geschichte [On the Periodization of Modern History]. Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berichte und Abhandlungen, 10, 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterhammel, J. (2014). The Transformation of the World. A Global History of the Nineteenth Century (P. Camiller, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partner, N., & Foot, S. (Eds.). (2013). The SAGE Handbook of Historical Theory. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa, H. (2015). Social Acceleration. A New Theory of Modernity (J. Trejo-Mathys, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runia, E. (2006). Presence. History and Theory, 45, 1–20.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Runia, E., & Brouwer, E. J. (Eds.). (2006). On Presence [Forum]. History and Theory, 45, 305–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüsen, J. (2000). Die Zukunft der Vergangenheit [The Future of the Past]. In S. Jordan (Ed.), Zukunft der Geschichte. Historisches Denken an der Schwelle zum 21. Jahrhundert (pp. 175–182). Berlin: Trafo Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabrow, M. (2012). Die Zeit der Zeitgeschichte [The Time of Contemporary History]. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. (1985). Islands of History. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato, M. (2015). Time, Chronology, and Periodization in History. In N. Smelser and P. Balthus (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 24, 2nd ed., pp. 409–414). Oxford: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, Z. S. (2011). The Birth of the Past. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sider, T., Hawthorne, J., & Zimmerman, D. (Eds.). (2008). Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simiand, F. (1903). Méthode historique et sciences sociales. In Revue de Synthèse Historique, 6, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Z. B. (2015). History Manifested: Making Sense of Unprecedented Change. European Review of History: Revue européenne d’histoire, 22, 819–834.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith Rumsey, A. (2016, May 20). The Risk of Digital Oblivion. The Chronicle of Higher Education 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, S. (2013). Unification of Time and the Fragmentation of Pasts in Meiji Japan. In B. Bevernage & C. Lorenz (Eds.), Breaking Up Time. Negotiating the Borders Between the Present, Past and Future (pp. 216–236). Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, S. (2016). History without Chronology. Public Culture 28, nr.1, 181–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torpey, J. (2006). Making Whole What Has Been Smashed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, A. (Ed.). (2009). A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Boxtel, C., & Grever, M. (2011). Between Disenchantment and High Expectations. History Education in the Netherlands, ca. 1968–2008. In E. Erdmann & W. Hasberg (Eds.), Facing, Mapping, Bridging Diversity. Foundation of a European Discourse on History Education (pp. 83–116). Schwalbach: Wochenschau Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Mieroop, K. (2016). The “Age of Commemoration” as a Narrative Construct: A Critique of the Discourse on the Contemporary Crisis of Memory in France. Rethinking History, doi:10.1080/13642529.2016.1159051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Ranke, L. (1854/2011). On Progress in History (From the First Lecture of King Maximilian II of Bavaria “On the Epochs of Modern History”, 1854) (W. A. Iggers, Trans.). In G. G. Iggers (Ed.), The Theory and Practice of History (pp. 20–24). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zammito, J. (2004). Koselleck’s Philosophy of Historical Time(s) and the Practice of History. History and Theory, 43, 124–135.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lorenz, C. (2017). ‘The Times They Are a-Changin’. On Time, Space and Periodization in History. In: Carretero, M., Berger, S., Grever, M. (eds) Palgrave Handbook of Research in Historical Culture and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52908-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52908-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52907-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52908-4

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)