Advertisement

Abstract

In recent decades, social scientists have carried out empirical studies in the laboratories, clinics and patient associations within and through which biological knowledge, biomedical practice, biosocialities and biological citizens are being co-produced. In this chapter, I sketch a novel analytics of what we might be conceptualised as the vitality of disease. Medical interventions are increasingly as much about improving (quality of) life as they are about saving and prolonging life. As a consequence, morbid living has come to be disciplined, for example, in patient schools aimed at teaching patients to learn how to live with their disease, through rating scales used to measure treatment effect on the ‘quality of life’ of patients in clinical trials and through disease-specific ‘Living with’ guides aimed at patients and carers.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the editors for comments which have improved this chapter considerably. The chapter was prepared within the framework of the European Research Council grant ‘The Vitality of Disease—Quality of Life in the Making’ (Grant no. 639275).

Literature

  1. Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alzheimer Association.2012. Livet med demens [Living with dementia]. Accessed 10 October 2012. http://www.alzheimer.dk/raad/livet-med-demens
  3. Alzheimer’s Society. 2012. The Dementia Guide: Living Well After Diagnosis. London.Google Scholar
  4. Armstrong, David, and Rachel Caldwell. 2004. Origins of the Concept of Quality of Life in Health Care: A Rhetorical Solution to a Political Problem. Social Theory & Health 2: 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biehl, Joao, and Adriana Petryna, eds. 2013. When People Come First: Critical Studies in Global Health. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brooks, Ricahrd. 2013. The EuroQol Group after 25 Years. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Callon, Michel, and Vololona Rabeharisoa. 2008. The Growing Engagement of Emergent Concerned Groups in Political and Economic Life: Lessons from the French Association of Neuromuscular Disease Patients. Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (2): 230–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Camic, Charles, Neil Gross, and Lamont Michele. 2011. Social Knowledge in the Making. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, David. 2014. NHS Could Be ‘Overwhelmed’ by People with Long-Term Medical Conditions. The Guardian, January 3, sec. Society. Accessed 15 January 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jan/03/nhs-overwhelmed-long-term-medical-conditions
  10. ———. 1994. A Vital Rationalist: Selected Writings from Georges Canguilhem. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2008. Knowledge of Life. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2012. Writings on Medicine. Trans. Stefanos Geroulanos and Todd Meyers. 2nd ed. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Carlens, E., Gunnar Dahlström, and Enn Nou. 1971. An Attempt to Include “Quality of Life” in Evaluation of Survival in Bronchial Cancer Therapy. Bronches 21: 215–219.Google Scholar
  14. Clarke, Adele E., Laura Mamo, Jennifer Ruth Fosket, Jennifer R. Fishman, and Janet K. Shim. 2009. Biomedicalization: Technoscience, Health, and Illness in the U.S. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collier, Stephen J., and Andrew Lakoff. 2007. On Regimes of Living. In Global Assemblages, ed. Aihwa Ong and Stephen J. Collier, 22–39. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dokumaci, Arseli. 2014. Performance as Evidence in Chronic Disease: Measuring Health Status and Treatment Outcomes through the Quantification of Performance. Performance Research: A Journal of the Performing Arts 19 (4): 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dumit, Jo. 2012. Drugs for Life: How Pharmaceutical Companies Define Our Health. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Epstein, Stephen. 1998. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Evans-Pritchard, Evans E. 1937. Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic Among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  20. Fanshel, S., and J.W. Bush. 1970. A Health-status Index and Its Application to Health Services Outcomes. Operations Research 18 (6): 1021–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fassin, Didier. 2009. Another Politics of Life Is Possible. Theory, Culture & Society 26 (5): 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ———. 1995. Discipline & Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan. 2nd ed. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  23. Franklin, Sarah. 2000. Life Itself—Global Nature and the Genetic Imaginary. In Global Nature, Global Culture, ed. S. Franklin, C. Lury, and J. Stacey, 188–227. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Geroulanos, Stefanos, and Todd Meyers. 2012. Introduction. In Writings on Medicine. Trans. Stefanos Geroulanos and Todd Meyers, ed. Georges Canguilhem, 2nd ed. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gibbon, Sahra, and Carlos Novas, eds. 2008. Biosocialities, Genetics and the Social Sciences: Making Biologies and Identities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Gold, Marthe, David Stevenson, and Dennis Fryback. 2002. HALYS and QALYS and DALYS, Oh My: Similarities and Differences in Summary Measures of Population Health. Annual Review of Public Health 23: 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greene, Jeremy. 2007. Prescribing by Numbers: Drugs and the Definition of Disease. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Herper, Matthew, and Peter Kang. 2006. The World’s Ten Best-Selling Drugs. Forbes. Accessed 10 February 2013. http://www.forbes.com/2006/03/21/pfizer-merck-amgen-cx_mh_pk_0321topdrugs.html
  29. Hvidovre Hospital. 2010. Efterbehandling i Kardiologisk Klinik—Hjerterehabilitering. Hvidovre: Hvidovre Hospital.Google Scholar
  30. Illich, Ivan. 1976. Limits to Medicine: Medical Nemesis, the Expropriation of Health. London: Boyars.Google Scholar
  31. Janzen, Jonathan M. 1978. The Quest for Therapy in Lower Zaire. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. Karnofsky, David A., and John H. Burchenal. 1949. The Clinical Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents in Cancer. In Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents, ed. MacLeod CM, 196–198. New York: Columbia University of Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kleinman, Arthur. 1980. Patients and Healers in the Context of Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 1988. The Illness Narratives: Suffering, Healing, and the Human Condition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Kleinman, Arthur, and Joan Kleinman. 1996. The Appeal of Experience; The Dismay of Images: Cultural Appropriations of Suffering in Our Times. Daedalus 125 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
  36. Lakoff, Andrew. 2007. The Right Patients for the Drug: Managing the Placebo Effect in Antidepressant Trials. BioSocieties 2 (1): 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lindsay, Sally, and Hubertus J.M. Vrijhoef. 2009. A Sociological Focus on ‘Expert Patients’. Health Sociology Review 18 (2): 139–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lippman, Abby. 1993. Prenatal Genetic Testing and Geneticization: Mother Matters for All. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 8 (suppl 1): 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lock, Margaret. 2013. The Alzheimer Conundrum: Entanglements of Dementia and Aging. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 2015. Comprehending the Body in the Era of the Epigenome. Current Anthropology 56 (2): 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MandagMorgen. 2011. Kommuner og Kronikere: Bedre Pleje og Behandling i Eget Hjem. Copenhagen: Rosendahls.Google Scholar
  42. Manderson, Leonore, and Carolyn Smith-Morris, eds. 2010. Chronic Conditions, Fluid States: Chronicity and the Anthropology of Illness. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP.Google Scholar
  43. Mattingly, Cheryl. 1998. Healing Dramas and Clinical Plots: The Narrative Structure of Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mattingly, Cheryl, Lone Grøn, and Lotte Meinert. 2011. Chronic Homework in Emerging Borderlands of Healthcare. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 35 (3): 347–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Meloni, Maurizio, and Giuseppe Testa. 2014. Scrutinizing the Epigenetics Revolution. BioSocieties 9: 431–456.Google Scholar
  46. Meloni, Maurizio, Simon Williams, and Paul Martin. 2016. The Biosocial: Sociological Themes and Issues. The Sociological Review Monographs 64 (1): 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. MoH. 2002. Sund hele livet [Healthy for Life]. Danish Government. Copenhagen: Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
  48. Mol, Anne Marie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. ———. 2008. The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. Milton Park, Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Mol, Anne Marie, Ingunn Moser, and Jeannette Pols. 2015. Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Bielefeld: Verlag.Google Scholar
  51. Moreira, Tiago, Orla O’Donovan, and Etaoine Howlett. 2014. Assembling Dementia Care: Patient Organisations and Social Research. BioSocieties 9 (2): 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Novas, Carlos. 2006. The Political Economy of Hope: Patients’ Organizations, Science and Biovalue. BioSocieties 1 (3): 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Patrick, Donald L., and Peniffer Erickson. 1993. Health Status and Health Policy: Quality of Life in Health Care Evaluation and Resource Allocation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Petryna, Adriana. 2002. Life Exposed: Biological Citizens after Chernobyl. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. ———. 2007. Clinical Trials Offshored: On Private Sector Science and Public Health. BioSocieties 2 (1): 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pickersgill, Martin, Jörg Niewöhner, Ruth Müller, Paul Martin, and Sarah Cunningham-Burley. 2013. Mapping the New Molecular Landscape: Social Dimensions of Epigenetics. New Genetics and Society 32 (4): 429–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rabeharisoa, Vololona, and Michel Callon. 2002. The Involvement of Patients’ Associations in Research. International Social Science Journal 54 (171): 57–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rabeharisoa, Vololona, Tiago Moreira, and A. Akrich. 2014. Evidence-based Activism: Patients’, Users’ and Activists’ Groups in Knowledge Society. BioSocieties 9 (2): 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rabinow, Paul. 1996. Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Rajan, Kaushik Sunder. 2006. Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rivers, William H.R. 1924. Medicine, Magic and Religion. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
  62. Roberts, Elizabeth F.S. 2015. Bio-Ethnography: A Collaborative, Methodological Experiment in Mexico City. Somatosphere, 26 February 2015. Accessed 7 February 2017. http://somatosphere.net/2015/02/bio-ethnography.html
  63. Rosenberg, C., and J. Golden. 1992. Framing Disease: Studies in Cultural History. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Round, Jerome. 2012. Is a QALY Still a QALY at the End of Life? Journal of Health Economics 31 (3): 521–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rose, Nikolas. 2007. The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rose, Nikolas, and Carlos Novas. 2005. Biological Citizenship. In Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, ed. A. Ong and S. Collier, 439–464. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  67. Steffen, Vibeke, Hanne Jessen, and Richard Jenkins, eds. 2005. Managing Uncertainty. Ethnographic Studies of Illness, Risk, and the Struggle for Control. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanums Press.Google Scholar
  68. Taylor, D., and M. Bury. 2007. Chronic Illness, Expert Patients and Care Transition. Sociology of Health & Illness 29 (1): 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Villadsen, Kaspar, and Ayo Wahlberg. 2015. The Government of Life: Managing Populations, Health and Scarcity. Economy and Society 44 (1): 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wahlberg, Ayo. 2007. Measuring Progress: Calculating the Life of Nations. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 14: 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. ———. 2008. Above and Beyond Superstition: Western Herbal Medicine and the Decriminalising of Placebo. History of the Human Sciences 21 (1): 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. ———. 2009. Serious Disease as Kinds of Living. In Contested Categories: Life Sciences in Society, ed. S. Bauer and A. Wahlberg, 89–112. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  73. Wahlberg, A. 2014. Human Activity Between Nature and Society: The Negotiation of Infertility in China. In Anthropology and Nature, ed. K. Hastrup, Chap. 11, 184–195.Google Scholar
  74. Wahlberg, Ayo, and Nikolas Rose. 2015. The Governmentalization of Living: Calculating Global Health. Economy and Society 44 (1): 60–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. WHO. 1998. Therapeutic Patient Education: Continuing Education Programmes for Health Care Providers in the Field of Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Report of a WHO Working Group. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  76. WHO. 2008. 2008–2013 Action Plan for the Global Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases. Geneva: WHO Press.Google Scholar
  77. Williams, Simon, Jonathan Gabe, and Peter Davis. 2009. Pharmaceuticals and Society: Critical Discourses and Debates. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  78. Whyte, Susan R. 2012. Chronicity and Control: Framing ‘Noncommunicable Diseases’ in Africa. Anthropology & Medicine 19 (1): 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. ———., ed. 2014. Second Chances: Surviving AIDS in Uganda. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ayo Wahlberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations