Advertisement

8 Start Ups as Vessels Carrying and Developing Science-Based Technologies: Starting and Restarting JonDeTech

  • Enrico Baraldi
  • Marcus Lindahl
  • Andrea Perna
Chapter

Abstract

The creation of start-ups is often aimed at commercializing science-based technologies (Pries & Guild, 2007; Shane, 2004; Wright, Clarysse, Mustar, & Lockett, 2007) and keeping control of them (Siegel, Waldman, Atwater, & Link, 2004). However, due to a high rate of failure, it is particularly hard to predict whether or not start-ups will succeed in commercializing their technology. Several barriers have emerged over time at individual, financial, organizational and technological levels (Markman, Siegel, & Wright, 2008).

Keywords

Print Circuit Board Organizational Arrangement Focal Technology Copper Indium Gallium Gallium Diselenide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aarikka-Stenroos, L., & Sandberg, B. (2012). From new-product development to commercialisation through networks. Journal of Business Research, 65(2), 198–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akrich, M., Callon, M., & Latour, B. (2002). The key to success in innovation PART I: The art of interessement. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balconi, M., Brusoni, S., & Orsenigo, L. (2010). In defense of the linear model: An essay. Research Policy, 39(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baraldi, E., Gregori, G. L., & Perna, A. (2011). Network evolution and the embedding of complex technical solutions: The case of the Leaf House network. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(6), 838–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baraldi, E., Gressetvold, E., & Harrison, D. (2012). Resource interaction in inter-organizational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 65(2), 266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ciabuschi, F., Perna, A., & Snehota, I. (2012). Assembling resources in the formation of a new business. Journal of Business Research, 65(2), 220–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Velde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning out new ventures: A typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 183–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Denrell, J. (2005). Selection bias and the perils of benchmarking. Harvard Business Review, 83(4), 114–119.Google Scholar
  9. Gilsing, V., Bekkers, R., Bodas Freitas, I., & van der Steen, M. (2011). Differences in technology transfer between science-based and development-based industries: Transfer mechanisms and barriers. Technovation, 31, 638–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Håkansson, H., & Snehota, I. (1995). Developing relationships in business networks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Håkansson, H., & Waluszewski, A. (2002). Managing technological development. IKEA, the environment and technology. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Håkansson, H., & Waluszewski, A. (2007). Knowledge and innovation in business and industry. The importance of using others. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  13. Halinen, A., & Törnroos, J.-Å. (2005). Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks. Journal of Business Research, 58(9), 1285–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoetker, G., & Agarwal, R. (2007). Death hurts, but it isn’t fatal: The postexit diffusion of knowledge created by innovative companies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 446–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingemansson, M. (2010). Success as science but burden for business? On the difficult relationship between scientific advancement and innovation. PhD. Thesis, Department of Business Studies, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
  16. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Lindeberg, M. (2015). Report on statistics of JonDeTech sensors AB. JonDeTech annual report.Google Scholar
  18. Markman, G. D., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2008). Research and technology commercialisation. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 1401–1423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin, H. (2015). Report on statistics of SenseAir AB. SenseAir annual report.Google Scholar
  20. Perna, A., Baraldi, E., & Waluszewski, A. (2015). Is the value created necessarily associated with money? On the connections between an innovation process and its monetary dimension: The case of Solibro’s thin-film solar cells. Industrial Marketing Management, 46, 108–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pries, F., & Guild, P. (2007). Commercial exploitation of new technologies arising from university research: Start-ups and markets for technology. R&D Management, 37(4), 319–328.Google Scholar
  22. Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA: Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialisation of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1), 115–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Strömsten, T., & Waluszewski, A. (2012). Governance and resource interaction in networks. The role of venture capital in a biotech start-up. Journal of Business Research, 65(2), 232–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Van de Ven, A., Polley, D., Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation journey. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1), 147–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P., & Lockett, A. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrico Baraldi
    • 1
  • Marcus Lindahl
    • 1
  • Andrea Perna
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Engineering SciencesUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of ManagementUniversitaà Politecnica delle MarcheAnconaItaly

Personalised recommendations