Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Crime, Genes, Neuroscience and Cyberspace
  • 383 Accesses

Abstract

This book reflects my growing fascination with crime, criminal behaviour and deviance in cyberspace and is a contribution towards metatheoretical development as part of the post-postmodern return to sociological theory and method associated with Archer (1995), Layder (1997, 2007), Mouzelis (1995, 2007), Owen (2009a, b, 2012a, b, 2014) and Sibeon (2004, 2007), in tandem with a cautious attempt to build bridges between criminological theory and selected insights from evolutionary psychology, behavioural genetics, neuroscience and the philosophy of Heidegger. To some extent, it reflects my role as Director of Uclan Cybercrime Research Unit (UCRU) at the University of Central Lancashire. Whilst there is no official ‘party line’ or philosophy in my UCRU research unit, the work that we do certainly draws heavily upon my ever-expanding, Genetic-Social framework. In what follows, I will suggest a way that criminological theory might move beyond several theoretical obstacles in order to conceptualise crime and criminal behaviour with a particular emphasis upon cybercrime and deviance in cyberspace. These obstacles are the nihilistic relativism of the postmodern and poststructuralist cultural turn, the oversocialised gaze and harshly environmentalist conceptions of the person; genetic fatalism or the equation of genetic predisposition with inevitability (Owen 2009a, 2012a) and biophobia (Freese et al. 2003) that appear to dominate mainstream criminology; and the sociological weaknesses of many so-called biosocial explanations of crime and criminal behaviour (see for instance Walsh and Beaver 2009; Walsh and Ellis 2003), which, although dealing adequately with biological variables, appear to neglect or make insufficient use of metaconcepts such as agency-structure, micro-macro and time-space in their accounts of the person. I will suggest that a way forward lies in the form of an ontologically flexible, metatheoretical sensitising device, alternatively referred to as post-postmodern or Genetic-Social in order to distance the framework from hardline sociobiology. In doing so, I demonstrate the explanatory potential of the latest incarnation of the Genetic-Social framework which has grown considerably in size, focus and application since my earlier attempts to expand Sibeon’s original anti-reductionist device to include ‘bringing in’ biology in analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archer, M. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J. B., et al. (1992). Behavioural Endocrinology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. (2013). The Effect of De-individuation of the Internet Troller on Criminal Procedure Implementation: An Interview with a Hater. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7(1), 28–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (2013). Virtual Criminology. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage Dictionary of Criminology (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckels, E., et al. (2014). Trolls Just Want to Have Fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67(9), 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1997). Evolutionary Psychology: A Primer. Available at the web site http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/primer.html

  • Costandi, M. (2013). Fift Ideas You Really Need to Know: The Human Brain. London: Quercus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1981). Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Body. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Filley, C. M., Price, B. H., Nell, V., Antoinette, T., Morgan, A. S., Bresnahan, J. K., Pincus, J. H., Gelbort, M. M., Weissberg, M., & Kelly, J. P. (2001). Towards an Understanding of Violence: Neurobehavioural Aspects of Unwarranted Physical Aggression: Aspen Neurobehavioural Conference Consensus Statement. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioural Neurology, 14, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freese, J., Li, J. C. A., & Wade, L. D. (2003). The Potential Relevances of Biology to Social Inquiry. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer, D., & Copeland, P. (1999). Living with Our Genes: Why They Matter More than You Think. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and Time (Translated by Joan Stambaugh, revised by Dennis J. Schmidt). Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The Bell Curve. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinteberg, B. (1996). Biology, Norms, and Personality: A Developmental Perspective. Neuropsychobiology, 34, 146–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layder, D. (1997). Modern Social Theory: Key Debates and New Directions. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layder, D. (1998a). Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Social Research. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Layder, D. (1998b). The Reality of Social Domains: Implications for Theory and Method. In T. May & M. Williams (Eds.), Knowing the Social World. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layder, D. (2007). Self-Identity and Personhood in Social Analysis: The Inadequacies of Postmodernism and Social Constructionism. In J. L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critical Debates. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J. F. (1986–1987). Rules and Paradoxes and Svelte Paradox. Cultural Critique, 5, 209–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. (1997). The Sickening Mind: Brain, Behaviour, Immunity and Disease. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. A., & Volavka, J. (1980). Biology and Crime. In N. Morris & M. Tonry (Eds.), Crime and Justice, Vol.2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mednick, S. A., Moffit, T., & Stack, S. (Eds.). (1987). The Causes of Crime: New Biological Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milovanovic, D. (2013). Postmodernism. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage Dictionary of Criminology (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouzelis, N. (1995). Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? Diagnosis and Remedies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouzelis, N. (2007). Cognitive Relativism: Between Positivistic and Relativistic Thinking in the Social Sciences. In J. L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critica Debates. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T. (2009a). Social Theory and Human Biotechnology. With a Foreword by Professor Derek Layder [University of Leicester]. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T. (2009b). England and Wales: The Criminal Justice System in ‘Post-Industrial Society’. In J. L. Powell & J. Hendricks (Eds.), The Welfare State in Post-Industrial Society: A Global Perspective. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T. (2012a). The Biological and the Social in Criminological Theory. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New Directions in Criminological Theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T. (2012b). Theorizing Masculinities and Crime: A Genetic-Social Approach. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, 5(3), 972–984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T. (2014). Criminological Theory: A Genetic-Social Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, T., & Owen, J. A. (2015). Virtual Criminology; Insights from Genetic-Social Science and Heidegger. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, 7(1), 17–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct: The New Science of Language and Mind. London: Penguin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shilling, C. (1993). The Body and Social Theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibeon, R. (1996). Contemporary Sociology and Policy Analysis: The New Sociology of Public Policy. London: Kogan Page and Tudor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibeon, R. (1999). Anti-reductionist Sociology. Sociology, 32(2), 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibeon, R. (2004). Rethinking Social Theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibeon, R. (2007). An Excursus in Post-Postmodern Social Science. In J. L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critical Debates. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suler, J. (2004). The Online Disinhibition Effect. CyberPsychology and Behaviour, 7(3), 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiihonen, J., et al. (2014). Genetic Background of Extreme Violent Behaviour. Molecular Psychiatry, 20, 786–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A., & Beaver, K. M. (Eds.). (2009). Biosocial Criminology: New Directions in Theory and Research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A., & Ellis, L. (Eds.). (2003). Biosocial Criminology: Challenging Environmentalism’s Supremacy. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1985). Crime and Human Nature. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Owen, T. (2017). Introduction. In: Crime, Genes, Neuroscience and Cyberspace. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52688-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52688-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52687-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52688-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics