Abstract
This book reflects my growing fascination with crime, criminal behaviour and deviance in cyberspace and is a contribution towards metatheoretical development as part of the post-postmodern return to sociological theory and method associated with Archer (1995), Layder (1997, 2007), Mouzelis (1995, 2007), Owen (2009a, b, 2012a, b, 2014) and Sibeon (2004, 2007), in tandem with a cautious attempt to build bridges between criminological theory and selected insights from evolutionary psychology, behavioural genetics, neuroscience and the philosophy of Heidegger. To some extent, it reflects my role as Director of Uclan Cybercrime Research Unit (UCRU) at the University of Central Lancashire. Whilst there is no official ‘party line’ or philosophy in my UCRU research unit, the work that we do certainly draws heavily upon my ever-expanding, Genetic-Social framework. In what follows, I will suggest a way that criminological theory might move beyond several theoretical obstacles in order to conceptualise crime and criminal behaviour with a particular emphasis upon cybercrime and deviance in cyberspace. These obstacles are the nihilistic relativism of the postmodern and poststructuralist cultural turn, the oversocialised gaze and harshly environmentalist conceptions of the person; genetic fatalism or the equation of genetic predisposition with inevitability (Owen 2009a, 2012a) and biophobia (Freese et al. 2003) that appear to dominate mainstream criminology; and the sociological weaknesses of many so-called biosocial explanations of crime and criminal behaviour (see for instance Walsh and Beaver 2009; Walsh and Ellis 2003), which, although dealing adequately with biological variables, appear to neglect or make insufficient use of metaconcepts such as agency-structure, micro-macro and time-space in their accounts of the person. I will suggest that a way forward lies in the form of an ontologically flexible, metatheoretical sensitising device, alternatively referred to as post-postmodern or Genetic-Social in order to distance the framework from hardline sociobiology. In doing so, I demonstrate the explanatory potential of the latest incarnation of the Genetic-Social framework which has grown considerably in size, focus and application since my earlier attempts to expand Sibeon’s original anti-reductionist device to include ‘bringing in’ biology in analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Archer, M. (1995). Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Becker, J. B., et al. (1992). Behavioural Endocrinology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bishop, J. (2013). The Effect of De-individuation of the Internet Troller on Criminal Procedure Implementation: An Interview with a Hater. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7(1), 28–48.
Brown, S. (2013). Virtual Criminology. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage Dictionary of Criminology (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Buckels, E., et al. (2014). Trolls Just Want to Have Fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67(9), 97–102.
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1997). Evolutionary Psychology: A Primer. Available at the web site http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/primer.html
Costandi, M. (2013). Fift Ideas You Really Need to Know: The Human Brain. London: Quercus.
Dennett, D. (1981). Brainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Body. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Filley, C. M., Price, B. H., Nell, V., Antoinette, T., Morgan, A. S., Bresnahan, J. K., Pincus, J. H., Gelbort, M. M., Weissberg, M., & Kelly, J. P. (2001). Towards an Understanding of Violence: Neurobehavioural Aspects of Unwarranted Physical Aggression: Aspen Neurobehavioural Conference Consensus Statement. Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioural Neurology, 14, 1–14.
Freese, J., Li, J. C. A., & Wade, L. D. (2003). The Potential Relevances of Biology to Social Inquiry. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 233–256.
Hamer, D., & Copeland, P. (1999). Living with Our Genes: Why They Matter More than You Think. London: Macmillan.
Heidegger, M. (2010). Being and Time (Translated by Joan Stambaugh, revised by Dennis J. Schmidt). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The Bell Curve. New York: Basic Books.
Klinteberg, B. (1996). Biology, Norms, and Personality: A Developmental Perspective. Neuropsychobiology, 34, 146–154.
Layder, D. (1997). Modern Social Theory: Key Debates and New Directions. London: UCL Press.
Layder, D. (1998a). Sociological Practice: Linking Theory and Social Research. London: Sage.
Layder, D. (1998b). The Reality of Social Domains: Implications for Theory and Method. In T. May & M. Williams (Eds.), Knowing the Social World. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Layder, D. (2007). Self-Identity and Personhood in Social Analysis: The Inadequacies of Postmodernism and Social Constructionism. In J. L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critical Debates. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Lyotard, J. F. (1986–1987). Rules and Paradoxes and Svelte Paradox. Cultural Critique, 5, 209–219.
Martin, P. (1997). The Sickening Mind: Brain, Behaviour, Immunity and Disease. London: HarperCollins.
Mednick, S. A., & Volavka, J. (1980). Biology and Crime. In N. Morris & M. Tonry (Eds.), Crime and Justice, Vol.2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mednick, S. A., Moffit, T., & Stack, S. (Eds.). (1987). The Causes of Crime: New Biological Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Milovanovic, D. (2013). Postmodernism. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage Dictionary of Criminology (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Mouzelis, N. (1995). Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? Diagnosis and Remedies. London: Routledge.
Mouzelis, N. (2007). Cognitive Relativism: Between Positivistic and Relativistic Thinking in the Social Sciences. In J. L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critica Debates. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Owen, T. (2009a). Social Theory and Human Biotechnology. With a Foreword by Professor Derek Layder [University of Leicester]. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Owen, T. (2009b). England and Wales: The Criminal Justice System in ‘Post-Industrial Society’. In J. L. Powell & J. Hendricks (Eds.), The Welfare State in Post-Industrial Society: A Global Perspective. New York: Springer.
Owen, T. (2012a). The Biological and the Social in Criminological Theory. In S. Hall & S. Winlow (Eds.), New Directions in Criminological Theory. London: Routledge.
Owen, T. (2012b). Theorizing Masculinities and Crime: A Genetic-Social Approach. International Journal of Criminology and Sociological Theory, 5(3), 972–984.
Owen, T. (2014). Criminological Theory: A Genetic-Social Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Owen, T., & Owen, J. A. (2015). Virtual Criminology; Insights from Genetic-Social Science and Heidegger. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, 7(1), 17–31.
Pinker, S. (1994). The Language Instinct: The New Science of Language and Mind. London: Penguin.
Shilling, C. (1993). The Body and Social Theory. London: Sage.
Sibeon, R. (1996). Contemporary Sociology and Policy Analysis: The New Sociology of Public Policy. London: Kogan Page and Tudor.
Sibeon, R. (1999). Anti-reductionist Sociology. Sociology, 32(2), 317–334.
Sibeon, R. (2004). Rethinking Social Theory. London: Sage.
Sibeon, R. (2007). An Excursus in Post-Postmodern Social Science. In J. L. Powell & T. Owen (Eds.), Reconstructing Postmodernism: Critical Debates. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Suler, J. (2004). The Online Disinhibition Effect. CyberPsychology and Behaviour, 7(3), 321–326.
Tiihonen, J., et al. (2014). Genetic Background of Extreme Violent Behaviour. Molecular Psychiatry, 20, 786–792.
Walsh, A., & Beaver, K. M. (Eds.). (2009). Biosocial Criminology: New Directions in Theory and Research. New York: Routledge.
Walsh, A., & Ellis, L. (Eds.). (2003). Biosocial Criminology: Challenging Environmentalism’s Supremacy. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
Wilson, J. Q., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1985). Crime and Human Nature. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Owen, T. (2017). Introduction. In: Crime, Genes, Neuroscience and Cyberspace. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52688-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52688-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52687-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52688-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)