Advertisement

Making and Unmaking “subjects”

  • Carol Bacchi
  • Susan Goodwin
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter draws on applications of the WPR approach to illustrate the usefulness of reflecting on how policies produce “subjects” through problematization. The argument is made that it is both relevant and important, in terms of policy development, to reflect on the ways in which policies constitute “subjects” as particular kinds of subjects, with possible impact on people’s sense of self and behaviors. The chapter shows that, through identifying the “people categories” and the subject positions available in policies, it becomes possible to consider how “subjects” are governed through subjectification effects. Such a form of analysis directs attention to the dividing practices often generated in policies. Further, it shows how specific problem representations produce targeted groups as responsible for an assumed “problem”, creating stigma and silencing the operation of other factors.

Keywords

subjectification subject position dividing practices stigmatization governable subjects 

Bibliography

  1. Alexander, S., & Coveney, J. (2013). A critical discourse analysis of Canadian and Australian public health recommendations promoting physical activity to children. Health Sociology Review, 22 (4), 353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, S., & Berglund, K. (2012). Part I: Policies for innovation. In S. Anderson, K. Berglund, E. Gunnarsson, E. Sundin (Eds.), Promoting innovation: Policies, practises and procedures, VINNOVA Report VR 2012.08, Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation System, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  3. Bletsas, A., & Michell, D. (2014). Classism on campus: Explaining and extending understandings of social class in the contemporary higher education debates. In H. Brook, D. Fergie, M. Maeorg, D. Michell (Eds.), Universities in transition: Foregrounding social contexts of knowledge in the first year experience. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bonham, J., Bacchi, C., Wanner, T. (2015). Gender and cycling: Gendering cycling subjects and forming bikes, practices and spaces as gendered objects. In J. Bonham, & M. Johnson (Eds.), Cycling futures. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian Higher Education, Final Report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
  6. Burkett, I., & Sheehan, G. (2009). From the margins to the mainstream: The challenges for microfinance in Australia. Melbourne: Brotherhood of St. Lawrence/Foresters Community Finance.Google Scholar
  7. Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In K.D. Knorr-Cetina, & A. Cicourel (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Towards an integration of micro and macro-sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  8. Davidson, A. (1990). Closing up the corpses. In G. Boulos (Ed.), Meaning and method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dreyfus, H.L., & Rabinow, P. (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1986) [1984], The use of pleasure. The history of sexuality, Volume 2, (trans: Hurley, R.). London: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, M. (1990a) [1978]. The history of sexuality. Volume I: An introduction (trans: Hurley, R.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  12. Gill, Z. (2012). Located subjects: The daily lives of policy workers. In A. Bletsas, & C. Beasley (Eds.), Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic interventions and exchanges. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.Google Scholar
  13. Goodwin, S., & Voola, A. (2013). Framing microfinance in Australia – gender neutral or gender blind? Australian Journal of Social Issues, 48 (2), 223–239.Google Scholar
  14. Hacking, I. (1986). Making up people. In T. Heller, & C. Brooke-Rose, (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, individuality and the self in Western thought. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Haydock, W. (2014). The rise and fall of the ‘‘nudge’’ of minimum unit pricing: The continuity of neoliberalism in alcohol policy in England. Critical Social Policy, 34, 260–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Henderson, J., & Fuller, J. (2011). “Problematising” Australian policy representations in responses to the physical health of people with mental health disorders. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 46 (2), 183–203.Google Scholar
  17. Hudson, C. (2012). New subject positions for non-traditional actors or business as usual in the strong region discourse. In S. Anderson, K. Berglund, E. Gunnarsson, E. Sundin, (Eds.), Promoting innovation: Policies, practices and procedures, VINNOVA Report VR 2012.08, Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation System, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  18. Jørgensen, M.B. (2012). Legitimizing policies: How policy approaches to irregular migrants are formulated and legitimized in Scandinavia. Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 6 (2), 46–53.Google Scholar
  19. Kvist, E., & Peterson, E. (2010). What has gender equality got to do with it? An analysis of policy debates surrounding domestic services in the welfare states of Spain and Sweden. NORA—Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 18 (3), 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Logan, H., Sumsion, J., Press, C. (2013). The Child Care Act 1972: A critical juncture in Australian ECEC and the emergence of “quality”. Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 38 (4), 84–91.Google Scholar
  21. Marginson, S. (1997). Subjects and subjugation: The economics of education as power-knowledge. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 18 (2), 215–227.Google Scholar
  22. Marsh, I. (2013). The uses of history in the unmaking of modern suicide. Journal of Social History, 46 (3), 744–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marshall, N. (2012a). Disability, inclusive development and the World Bank: The construction and problematisation of disability in international development policy, PhD thesis, Faculty of Social Sciences and Law, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  24. Marshall, N. (2012b). Digging deeper: The challenge of problematising “inclusive development” and “disability mainstreaming”. In A. Bletsas, & C. Beasley (Eds.), Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic interventions and exchanges. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.Google Scholar
  25. McPhee, H. (2001). A course to nowhere. The Melbourne Age, 4 August.Google Scholar
  26. New South Wales Department of Health (2009). Physical health care of mental health consumers: Guidelines. North Sydney: NSW Department of Health.Google Scholar
  27. Nielsen, R., & Bonham, J. (2015). More than a message: Producing cyclists through public safety advertising campaigns. In J. Bonham, & M. Johnson (Eds.), Cycling futures. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rönnblom, M., & Keisu, B. (2013). Constructions of innovation and gender (equality) in Swedish universities. International Journal of Gender & Entrepreneurship, 5 (3), 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rose, N. (2000). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought, 1st edition 1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Sandberg, L., & Rönnblom, M. (2014). “I don’t think we’ll ever be finished with this”: Fear and safety in policy and practice. Urban Studies, 1–16. DOI:  10.1177/0042098014550453.Google Scholar
  31. Southgate, E., & Bennett, A. (2014). Excavating widening participation policy in Australian higher education: Subject positions, representational effects, emotion. Creative Approaches to Research, 7 (1), 21–45.Google Scholar
  32. UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) (2015). Worldwide displacement hits all-time high as war and persecution increase. News Stories, 18 June, http://www.unhcr.org/558193896.html. Accessed 20 November 2015.
  33. Widding, U. (2011). Problematic parents and the community parent education: Representations of social class, ethnicity, and gender. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 23 (1), 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol Bacchi
    • 1
  • Susan Goodwin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PoliticsUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Education and Social WorkUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations