Abstract
This chapter pursues a central task in the book, explaining what is accomplished by focusing on how policies produce or constitute “problems”. To begin, it canvasses how “problems” are conceptualized in classic rationalist, and in more recent interpretive and critical realist approaches to policy analysis, and indicates the possible deleterious implications of assuming the existence of problems as objective and uncontroversial states. Second, the chapter draws on WPR applications in two policy areas—alcohol and drugs policy and gender equality policy—to show how the interrogation of problematizations provides important insights into how governing takes place. In this way it illustrates the distinctive contribution of a poststructural questioning of “problems”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Alexander, S., & Coveney, J. (2013). A critical discourse analysis of Canadian and Australian public health recommendations promoting physical activity to children. Health Sociology Review, 22 (4), 353–364.
ANCD (2012). 1st Recovery Roundtable Report. Canberra: Australian National Council on Drugs.
Armstrong, E. (2007). Moral panic over meth. Contemporary Justice Review, 10 (4), 427–442.
Australian Public Service Commission (2007). Tackling wicked problems: A public policy perspective. Canberra: Australian Government.
Bacchi, C. (1999). Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems. London: Sage.
Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education.
Bacchi, C. (2015b). Problematizations in alcohol policy: WHO’s “alcohol problems”. Contemporary Drug Problems, 42 (2), 130–147.
Bacchi, C., & Bonham, J. (2014). Reclaiming discursive practices as an analytic focus: Political implications. Foucault Studies, 17, 173–192.
Bambra, C., Smith, K. E., Garthwaite, K., Joyce, K.D., Hunter, D.J. (2011). A labour of Sisyphus? Public policy and health inequalities research from the Black and Acheson Reports to the Marmot Review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 65 (5), 399–406.
Bjørnholt, M. (2012). From work-sharing couples to equal parents: Changing perspectives of men and gender equality. In C. Krekula, M. Åberg, M.J. Samuelsson (Eds.), Gender and change: Power, politics and everyday practices. Karlstad: Karlstad University Press.
Calvo, D. (2013). What is the problem of gender? Mainstreaming gender in migration and development in the European Union, PhD Thesis, Department of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg.
Carson, L., & Edwards, K. (2011). Prostitution and sex trafficking: What are the problems represented to be? A discursive analysis of law and policy in Sweden and Victoria, Australia. The Australian Feminist Law Journal, 34, 63–87.
Cohen, S. (2002) [1972]. Folk devils and moral panics: The creation of the mods and rockers. London and New York: Routledge.
Council of the European Union (2004). EU Drug Strategy 2005–2012. Brussels.
Dery, D. (1984). Problem definition in policy analysis. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
du Rose, N. (2015). The governance of female drug users: Women’s experiences of drug policy. Bristol: Policy Press.
Elsey, H., Tolhurst, R., Theobald, S. (2005). Mainstreaming HIV/AIDS in development sectors: Have we learnt the lessons from gender mainstreaming? AIDS Care, 17 (8), 988–998.
Foucault, M. (1994a) [1981]. So is it important to think? In J.D. Faubion, (Ed.), Power: Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, vol. 3, Hurley, R. and others (trans.). London: Penguin.
Fraser, S., & Moore, D. (2011). Governing through problems: The formulation of policy on amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS) in Australia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 22, 498–506.
Freeman, R. (2006). The work the document does: Research, policy, and equity in health. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 31 (1), 51–70.
Glynos, J., & Howarth, D. (2007). Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. London: Routledge.
Grebe, C. (2009). Reconciliation policy in Germany 1998–2008: Construing the “problem” of the incompatibility of paid employment and care work, PhD Dissertation, University of Nottingham, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Weisbaden.
Hearn, J., & McKie, L. (2010). Gendered and social hierarchies in problem representation and policy processes: “Domestic violence” in Finland and Scotland, Violence Against Women, 16 (2), 136–158.
Hoppe, R. (2002). Cultures of public policy problems. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 4 (3), 305–326.
Hoppe, R. (2011). The governance of problems: Puzzling, power and participation. Bristol: Polity Press.
Jann, W., & Wegrich, K. (2007). Theories of the policy cycle. In F. Fischer, G.J. Miller, M.S. Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.
Kingdon, J.W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies, 1st edition 1984. New York: Longman.
Kok, M., & de Coninck, H. (2007). Widening the scope of politics to address climate change: Directions for mainstreaming. Environment Science & Policy, 10 (7–8), 587–599.
Lancaster, K. (2014). Social construction and the evidence-based drug policy endeavour. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25, 948–951.
Lancaster, K., Duke, K., Ritter, A. (2015). Producing the “problem of drugs”: A cross-national comparison of “recovery” discourse in two Australian and British reports. International Journal of Drug Policy, 26, 617–625.
Lancaster, K., Hughes, C.E., Chalmers, J., Ritter, A. (2012). More than problem-solving: Critical reflections on the “problematisation” of alcohol-related violence in Kings Cross. Drug and Alcohol Review, 31, 925–927.
Lancaster, K., Ritter, A., Colebatch, H. (2014). Problems, policy and politics: Making sense of Australia’s “ice epidemic”. Policy Studies, 35 (2), 147–171.
Lancaster, K., Seear, K., Treloar, C. (2015). Laws prohibiting peer distribution of injecting equipment in Australia: A critical analysis of their effects. International Journal of Drug Policy, 16 (12), 1198–1206.
Lasswell, H.D. (1956). The decision process: Seven categories of functional analysis. College Park: University of Maryland Press.
Levine, H.G. (1984). The alcohol problem in America: From temperance to alcoholism. British Journal of Addiction, 79, 109–118.
Lindblom, C.E. (1980). The policy-making process, 2nd edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Martin, F., & Aston, S. (2014). A “special population” with “unique treatment needs”: Dominant representations of “womenʼs substance abuse” and their effects. Contemporary Drug Problems, 41, 355–360.
Mohanty, C.T. (1991). Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In C.T. Mohanty, A. Russo, L. Torres (Eds.), Third world women and the politics of feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Osborne, T. (1997). Of health and statecraft. In A. Petersen, & R. Bunton (Eds.), Foucault: Health and medicine. London: Routledge.
Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (2004). Realist evaluation, funded by British Cabinet Office,www.communitymatters.com.au/RE_chapter.pdf. Accessed 31 December 2015.
Payne, S. (2014). Constructing the gendered body? A critical discourse analysis of gender equality schemes in the health sector in England. Current Sociology, 62 (7), 956–974.
Pease, B. (2011). Governing men’s violence against women in Australia. In E. Ruspini, J. Hearn, B. Pease, K. Pringle, (Eds.), Men and masculinities around the world: Transforming men’s practices. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Poulson, H. (2006). The elusive gender: the International Labour Organization and the construction of gender equality, PhD Thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.
Powell, A., & Murray, S. (2008). Children and domestic violence: Constructing a policy problem in Australia and New Zealand. Social & Legal Studies, 17 (4), 453–473.
Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1977). Problem setting in policy research. In C. Weiss (Ed.), Using research in public policy making. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Schön, D.A. (1979). Generative metaphor: A perspective on problem-setting in social policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Seear, K., & Fraser, S. (2014). The addict as victim: Producing the “problem” of addiction in Australian victims of crime compensation laws. International Journal of Drug Policy, 25, 826–835.
Shapiro, I. (2002). Problems, methods, and theories in the study of politics, or what’s wrong with political science and what to do about it. Political Theory, 30, 596–619.
Simon, H. (1961) [1945]. Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization, 2nd edition. New York: Macmillan.
Smith, K.E., Hunter, D.J., Blackman, T., Elliot, E., Green, A., Harrington, B. E., Marks, L., McKee, L., Williams, G.H. (2009). Divergence or convergence? Health inequalities and policy in a devolved Britain. Critical Social Policy, 29 (2), 216–242.
Sutton, C. (1998). Swedish alcohol discourse: Constructions of a social problem (Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy & Sociology), Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Sociologica Upsaliensia, 45.
Turnbull, N. (2005). Policy in question: From problem solving to problematology, PhD thesis, School of Social Science and Policy, University of New South Wales, Sydney.
UKDPC (2008). The UK Drug Policy Commission Recovery Consensus Group: A vision of recovery. London: UK Drug Policy Commission.
WHO (World Health Organization) (1980). Expert Committee Report on Problems Related to Alcohol Consumption (WHO Technical Report Series 650), World Health Organization, Geneva.
WHO (World Health Organization) (2010). Global strategy on the harmful use of alcohol. Geneva: WHO.
WHO (World Health Organization) (2015). Health in all policies: Training manual. Geneva: World Health Organization.
Wildavsky, A. (1979). The art and craft of policy analysis. London: Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bacchi, C., Goodwin, S. (2016). Making and Unmaking “problems”. In: Poststructural Policy Analysis. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52546-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52546-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52544-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52546-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)