Advertisement

Key Themes and Concepts

  • Carol Bacchi
  • Susan Goodwin
Chapter
  • 7k Downloads

Abstract

The “What’s the Problem Represented to be?” (WPR) approach invokes a number of concepts that require elaboration. Many rely, at least to an extent, upon the writings of Michel Foucault, indicated in the quotations from his works. This chapter explains how these concepts are interlinked and how they function to produce the form of theorizing enabled by a WPR form of analysis. The following topics are addressed: what it means to describe policy as productive; the kinds of practices targeted for scrutiny; how discourses feature in the analysis; what is involved in problematizing and problematization; what is achieved by expanding “government” to include the roles of professionals, experts, and allied agencies; how genealogy produces a “history of the present”; the place of political “subjects” in a Foucault-influenced analysis.

Keywords

power practices discourse problematization governmentality genealogy subjectification 

Bibliography

  1. Aitken, R. (2006). Performativity, popular finance and security in the global political economy. In M. de Goede (Ed.), International political economy and poststructural politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Constructing research questions: Doing interesting research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Government (2007). Changing behaviour: A public policy perspective. Canberra: Australian Public Service Commission.Google Scholar
  4. Bacchi, C. (1999). Women, policy and politics: The construction of policy problems. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  6. Bacchi, C. (2012). Why study problematizations? Making politics visible. Open Journal of Political Science, 2 (1), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bacchi, C. (2015a). The turn to problematization: Political implications of contrasting interpretive and poststructural adaptations. Open Journal of Political Science, 5, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bacchi, C. (2015b). Problematizations in alcohol policy: WHO’s “alcohol problems”. Contemporary Drug Problems, 42 (2), 130–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bacchi, C. (2016a). Policies as gendering practices: Re-viewing categorical distinctions, Journal of Women, Politics and Policy, DOI: 10.1080/1554477X.2016.1198207.Google Scholar
  10. Bacchi, C., & Bonham, J. (2014). Reclaiming discursive practices as an analytic focus: Political implications. Foucault Studies, 17, 173–192.Google Scholar
  11. Bacchi, C., & Eveline, J. (eds) (2010). Mainstreaming politics: Gendering practices and feminist theory. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bernauer, J.W. (1992). Michel Foucault’s force of flight: Toward an ethics for thought. New Jersey: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
  13. Bigo, D. (2002). Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27, 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bletsas, A. (2012). Spaces between: Elaborating the theoretical underpinnings of the “WPR” approach and its significance for contemporary scholarship. In A. Bletsas, & C. Beasley (Eds.), Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic interventions and exchanges. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bonham, J., Bacchi, C., Wanner, T. (2015). Gender and cycling: Gendering cycling subjects and forming bikes, practices and spaces as gendered objects. In J. Bonham, & M. Johnson (Eds.), Cycling futures. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bordo, S. (2003). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, W. (1998). Genealogical politics. In J. Moss (Ed.), The later Foucault: Politics and philosophy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “sex”. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Carrington, K., & Watson, P. (1996). Policing sexual violence: Feminism, criminal justice and governmentality. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 24 (3), 253–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carter, P.M. (2013). Poststructuralist theory and sociolinguistics: Mapping the linguistic turn in social theory. Language and Linguistics Compass, 7 (11), 580–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (2009). Elusive publics: Knowledge, power and public service reform. In S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall, A. Cribb (Eds.), Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, challenges, and ways forward. UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Clifford, M. (2001). Political genealogy after Foucault: Savage identities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Clough, P.T. (2007). Notes towards a theory of affect-itself. Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization, 7, 60–77.Google Scholar
  24. Cohen, C. (2014). Male rape is a feminist issue: Feminism, governmentality and male rape. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Colebatch, H., Hoppe, R., Noordegraaf, M. (2010). The lessons for policy work. In H. Colebatch, R. Hoppe, M. Noordgraaf (Eds.), Working for policy. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Dean, M. (2002). A genealogy of the government of poverty. Economy and Society, 21 (3), 215–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dean, M., & Hindess, B. (1998). Governing Australia: Studies in contemporary rationalities of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Death, C. (2006). Resisting (nuclear) power? Environmental regulation in South Africa. Review of African Political Economy, 33 (109), 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Death, C. (2010). Counter-conducts: A Foucauldian analytics of protest. Social Movement Studies, 9 (3), 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. de Goede, M. (2006). International political economy and the promises of poststructuralism. In M. de Goede (Ed.), International political economy and poststructural politics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Deleuze, G. (1992). Foucault. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  33. Dhamoon, R.K. (2011). Considerations on mainstreaming intersectionality. Political Research Quarterly, 64 (1), 230–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dreyfus, H.L., & Rabinow, P. (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, 2nd edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. du Rose, N. (2015). The governance of female drug users: Women’s experiences of drug policy. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Eribon, D. (1991). Michel Foucault. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  37. Eveline, J. (2005). Woman in the Ivory Tower: Gendering feminised and masculinised identities. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 18 (6), 641–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ewald, F. (1991). Insurance and risk. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  39. Ezzamel, M., & Willmott, H. (2009). Strategy and strategizing: A poststructuralist perspective. The Globalization of Strategy Research, Advances in Strategic Management, 27, 75–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fernandez, B. (2012). Transformative policy for poor women: A new feminist framework. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  41. Fischer, F. (1980). Politics, values and public policy: The problem of methodology. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  42. Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Flynn, T. (1989). Symposiums papers: Foucault and the politics of postmodernity. Noûs, 23 (2), 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Flynn, T. (2006). Foucault’s mapping of history. In G. Gutting (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Foucault, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Foucault, M. (1969). Pamphlet submitted to Professors of the Collège de France. Cited in D. Eribon (1991) Michel Foucault, Wing, B. (trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge, and the discourse on language (trans: Sheridan Smith, A.M.). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  47. Foucault, M. (1977) [1971]. Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In D.F. Bouchard, (Ed.), Language, counter-memory, practice: Selected essays and interviews. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (trans: Sheridan, A.). New York: Vintage/Random House.Google Scholar
  49. Foucault, M. (1980). Two lectures. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Michel Foucault power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977 by Michel Foucault. Gordon, C., Marshall, L., Mepham, J. and Soper, K. (trans.). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  50. Foucault, M. (1984a). The means of correct training [from Discipline and Punish]. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  51. Foucault, M. (1984b), What is Enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  52. Foucault, M. (1986) [1984], The use of pleasure. The history of sexuality, Volume 2, (trans: Hurley, R.). London: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  53. Foucault, M. (1987). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: An interview with Michel Foucault on January 20, 1984, with R. Fornet-Betancourt, H. Becker, A. Gomez-Müller, J.C. Gauthier, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 12, 112–131.Google Scholar
  54. Foucault, M. (1990a) [1978]. The history of sexuality. Volume I: An introduction (trans: Hurley, R.). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  55. Foucault, M. (1990b). Critical theory/intellectual history. In L. Kritzman (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture: Interviews & other writings 1977–1984, 1st edition 1988, Sheridan, A. (trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Foucault, M. (1990c). The concern for truth. In L.D. Kritzman (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Politics, philosophy, culture. Interviews and other writings, 1977–1984, 1st edition 1988, A. Sheridan, (trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Foucault, M. (1991a) [1978]. Politics and the study of discourse. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  58. Foucault, M. (1991b) [1981]. Questions of method. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  59. Foucault, M. (1991c) [1978]. Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  60. Foucault, M. (1994a) [1981]. So is it important to think? In J.D. Faubion, (Ed.), Power: Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, vol. 3, Hurley, R. and others (trans.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  61. Foucault, M. (1994b). Table ronde du 20 mai 1978. In D. Defert, & F. Ewald (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Dits et Écrits, tome IV. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  62. Foucault, M. (2000) [1982]. The subject and power. In J.D. Faubion (Ed.), Power: Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984, vol. 3, Hurley, R. and others (trans.). New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  63. Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended. In M. Bertani, & A. Fontana (Eds.), Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–76, Macey, D. (trans.). New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  64. Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics. In M. Senellart (Ed.), Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979, G. Burchell (trans.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  65. Foucault, M. (2009). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978, Senellart, M. (ed.), Burchell, G. (trans.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  66. Fraser, S., Moore, D., Keane, H. (2014). Habits: Remaking addiction. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Gherardi, S. (2009). Introduction: The critical power of the “practice lens”. Management Learning, 40 (2), 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Golder, B. (2010). Foucault and the unfinished human of rights. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 6 (3), 354–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Goodwin, N. (1996). Governmentality in the Queensland Department of Education: Policies and the management of schools. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 17 (1), 65–74.Google Scholar
  70. Gordon, C. (1991). Governmental rationality: An introduction. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  71. Gulson, K.N., & Metcalfe, A.S. (2015). Introduction: Education policy analysis for a complex world: Poststructural possibilities. Critical Studies in Education, 56 (1), 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Harris, P. (1999). Public welfare and liberal governance. In A. Petersen, I. Barns, J. Dudley, P. Harris (Eds.), Poststructuralism, citizenship and social policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Haugaard, M., & Clegg, S. (2009). Introduction: Why power is the central concept of the social sciences. In S. Clegg, & M. Haugaard (Eds.), The Sage handbook of power. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  74. Henman, P. (2006). Segmentation and conditionality: Technological reconfigurations in social policy and social citizenship. In G. Marston, & C. McDonald, (Eds.), Analysing social policy: A governmental approach. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  75. Hoppe, R. (2002). Cultures of public policy problems. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 4 (3), 305–326.Google Scholar
  76. Hoppe, R. (2011). The governance of problems: Puzzling, power and participation. Bristol: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  77. Inda, J. (2005). Analytics of the modern: An introduction. In J. Inda (Ed.), Anthropologies of modernity: Foucault, governmentality and life politics. Malden: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Koopman, C. (2013). Genealogy as critique: Foucault and the problems of modernity. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Kulynych, J.J. (1997). Performing politics: Foucault, Habermas and postmodern participation. Polity, 30 (2), 315–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Larner, W. (2000). Neo-liberalism: Policy, ideology, governmentality. Studies in Political Economy, 63, 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Larner, W. (2008). Comments on Kevin Stenson’s “Governing the local: Sovereignty, social governance and community safety”. Social Work and Society – International Online Journal, 6 (1), 21–25, www.socwork.net/sws/article/download/87/144. Accessed 14 January, 2016.
  82. Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  83. McHoul, A., & Grace, W. (1993). A Foucault primer: Discourse, power and the subject. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Miller, P. (2001). Governing by numbers: Why calculative practices matter. Social Research, 68 (2), 379–396.Google Scholar
  85. Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990). Governing economic life. Economy and Society, 19 (1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Mitchell, K. (2006). Neoliberal governmentality in the European Union: Education, training and technologies of citizenship. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 24, 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics: A word and some questions. In J. Law, & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  88. Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Osborne, T. (1997). Of health and statecraft. In A. Petersen, & R. Bunton (Eds.), Foucault: Health and medicine. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  90. Postill, J. (2010). Introduction: Theorizing media and practice. In B. Bräuchler, & J. Postill (Eds.), Theorizing media and practice. Oxford and New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
  91. Prügl, E. (2015). Neoliberalising feminism. New Political Economy , 20 (4), 614–631, doi: 10.1080/13563467.2014.951614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Rabinow, P. (2003). Anthropos today: Reflections on modern equipment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Race, K. (2005). Recreational states: Drugs and the sovereignty of consumption. Culture Machine, 7, 1–10.Google Scholar
  94. Ristovski-Slijepcevic, S., Chapman, G., Beagan, B. (2010). Being a “good mother”: Dietary governmentality in the family food practices of three ethnocultural groups in Canada. Health, 14 (5), 467–483.Google Scholar
  95. Rönnblom, M. (2012). Post-structural comparative politics: Acknowledging the political effects of research. In A. Bletsas, & C. Beasley (Eds.), Engaging with Carol Bacchi: Strategic interventions and exchanges. Adelaide: University of Adelaide Press.Google Scholar
  96. Rose, N. (1991). Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16 (7), 673–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Rose, N. (2000). Powers of freedom: Reframing political thought, 1st edition 1999. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Rose, N., O’Malley, P., Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Rowse, T. (2009). The ontological politics of “closing the gaps”. Journal of Cultural Economy, 2 (1&2), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sanger, T. (2008). Trans governmentality: The production and regulation of gendered subjectivities. Journal of Gender Studies, 17 (1), 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Schatzki, T. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. Schatzki, K.K. Cetina, E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  102. Smart, C. (1996). Deconstructing motherhood. In E. Silva (Ed.), Good enough mothering? Feminist perspectives on lone motherhood. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  103. St. Pierre, E.A. (2006). Scientifically based research in education: Epistemology and ethics. Adult Education Quarterly, 56, 239–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Tamboukou, M. (1999). Writing genealogies: An exploration of Foucault’s strategies for doing research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 20 (2), 201–217.Google Scholar
  105. Tanesini, A. (1994). Whose language? In K. Lennon, & M. Whitford (Eds.), Knowing the difference: Feminist perspectives in epistemology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  106. Tilley, N. (2010). Whither problem-oriented policing? Criminology and Public Policy, 9 (1), 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Turnbull, N. (2005). Policy in question: From problem solving to problematology, PhD thesis, School of Social Science and Policy, University of New South Wales, Sydney.Google Scholar
  108. Valverde, M. (1998). Diseases of the will: Alcohol and the dilemmas of freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Veyne, P. (1997). Foucault revolutionizes history. In A.I. Davidson (Ed.), Foucault and his Interlocutors, Porter, C. (trans.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  110. Walters, W. (2004). Secure borders, safe haven, domopolitics. Citizenship Studies, 8, 237–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Walters, W. (2006). “The end of the passing past”: Towards polytemporal policy studies. In G. Marston, & C. McDonald (Eds.), Reframing social policy: A governmental approach. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  112. Walters, W. (2009). Europe’s borders. In C. Rumford (Ed.), The Sage handbook of European Studies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  113. Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  114. Zournazi, M. (2002). Navigating movements: An interview with Brian Massumi. In M. Zournazi (Ed.), Hope: New Philosophies for Change. Annandale, NSW: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol Bacchi
    • 1
  • Susan Goodwin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PoliticsUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Faculty of Education and Social WorkUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations