Abstract
It has been generally understood that parasport (disability sport) events aim to alter perceptions towards disability and change attitudes about the potential of disability sport. However, given the complexity of understanding attitudes, perceptions, and awareness, it is necessary to employ multiple overlapping methods to critically examine the various social, economic, and infrastructural arrangements that affect accessibility, mobility, and access to resources. Moreover, event researchers often focus on the here and now rather than assess the longer-term impact or legacy on a range of stakeholders. From this perspective, mixing qualitative ethnographic approaches and quantitative statistical measures offers a way to interrogate social values, institutional priorities, and political will for social change, over a longer time period.
In this chapter, we discuss the complexity of such an approach from our work examining large-scale sporting events and parasport legacies. Our cases are the 2014 Commonwealth Games (Glasgow, Scotland) and the 2015 Pan/Para-pan American Games (Toronto, Ontario, Canada). These events were chosen due to their similarity in size and scale, and because they represent unique cases regarding integrated (Commonwealth Games) and non-integrated (Pan/Para-pan American Games) events. Additionally, each of the cities set to host the respective Games has established specific objectives in relation to increasing accessibility and advancing social inclusion in the host region for persons with a disability. For each case, we have employed exploratory multiple case study designs using ethnographic interviews, document analyses, media analyses, and direct observations, all informed by the lived experiences of persons with disability. In this chapter, we discuss the nuances of a mixed methods approach with particular focus on the role of critical disability theory that challenges ableist assumptions often embedded in social research designs. We pay careful attention to the intricacies and peculiarities of such a complex approach with the aim of storying the research experience and the research process in order to challenge researchers to see the social value in the complexity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barnes, C. (2003). What a difference a decade makes: Reflections on doing ‘emancipatory’ disability research. Disability & Society, 18(1), 3–17. doi:10.1080/713662197.
Barnes, C. & Mercer, G. (2005). Disability, work, and welfare: Challenging the social exclusion of disabled people. Work, Employment & Society, 19(3), 527–545. doi:10.1177/0950017005055669.
Campbell, F. K. (2009). Contours of ableism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Carey, M., Mason, D. S., & Misener, L. (2011). Social responsibility and the competitive bid process for major sporting events. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 35(3), 246–263.
Cashman, R. & Darcy, S. (2008). Benchmark games: The Sydney 2000 Paralympic Games. Petersham, NSW Australia: Walla Walla Press in conjunction with the Australian Centre for Olympic Studies.
Cashman, R., Toohey, K., Darcy, S., Symons, C., & Stewart, B. (2004). When the carnival is over : Evaluating the outcomes of mega sporting events in Australia. Sporting Traditions, 21(1), 1–32.
Chadwick, A. (1996). Knowledge, power and the disability discrimination bill. Disability & Society, 11(1), 25–40. doi:10.1080/09687599650023308.
Chalip, L. (2014). From legacy to leverage. In J. Grix (Ed.), Leveraging legacies from Mega Events. Concepts and cases (pp. 2–12). Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK.
Chalip, L. (2004). Beyond impact: A general model for sport event leverage. In B. W. Ritchie & D. Adair (Eds.), Sport tourism: Interrelationships, impacts and issues (pp. 226–252). Clevedon, UK: Channelview.
DePauw, K. P. (1997). The (In)visibility of DisAbility: Cultural contexts and ‘sporting bodies’. Quest, 49(4), 416–430. doi:10.1080/00336297.1997.10484258.
DePauw, K. P. (2000). Social-cultural context of disability: Implications for scientific inquiry and professional preparation. Quest, 52(4), 358–368. doi:10.1080/00336297.2000.10491723.
Devlin, R. & Pothier, D. (2006). Critical disability theory: Essays in philosophy, politics, policy, and law. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
Dickson, T. J., Benson, A. M., & Blackman, D. A. (2011). Developing a framework for evaluating Olympic and Paralympic legacies. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 16(4), 285–302. doi:10.1080/14775085.2011.635014.
Dwyer, L., Forsyth, P., & Spurr, R. (2005). Estimating the impacts of special events on an economy. Journal of Travel Research, 43(4), 351–359.
Foley, M., McGillivray, D., & McPherson, G. (2011). Event policy: From theory to strategy. London: Routledge.
Gratton, C. & Preuss, H. (2008). Maximizing Olympic impacts by building up legacies. International Journal of the History of Sport, 25(14), 1922–1938.
Grix, J. (2012). ‘Image’ leveraging and sports mega-events: Germany and the 2006 FIFA World Cup. Journal of Sport & Tourism, 17(4), 289–312. doi:10.1080/14775085.2012.760934.
Hiller, H. H. & Wanner, R. A. (2011). Public opinion in host Olympic Cities: The case of the 2010 Vancouver Winter Games. Sociology, 45(5), 883–899. doi:10.1177/0038038511413414.
Horne, J. & Manzenreiter, W. (2006). An introduction to the sociology of sports mega-events. The sociological review. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Inc.. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2006.00650.x.
Howe, D. (2008). The cultural politics of the paralympic movement. Routledge critical studies in sport. London: Routledge.
Jones, C. (2001a). A level playing field? Sports stadium infrastructure and urban development in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning, 33(5), 845–861.
Jones, C. (2001b). Mega-events and host-region impacts: Determining the true worth of the 1999 Rugby World Cup. International Journal of Tourism Research, 3(3), 241–251.
Kaplanidou, K., Karadakis, K., Gibson, H., Thapa, B., Walker, M., Geldenhuys, S., et al. (2013). Quality of life, event impacts, and mega-event support among South African Residents before and after the 2010 FIFA World Cup. Journal of Travel Research, 52(5), 631–645. doi:10.1177/0047287513478501.
Le Clair, J. M. (2011). Global organizational change in sport and the shifting meaning of disability. Sport in Society, 14(9), 1072–1093. doi:10.1080/17430437.2011.614765.
Legg, D. & Gilbert, K. (2011). Paralympic legacies. Sport and society. Champaign, Ill.: Common Ground Publishing.
Misener, L. (2015). Leveraging parasport events for community participation: Development of a theoretical framework. European Sport Management Quarterly, 15, 132–153. doi:10.1080/16184742.2014.997773.
Misener, L., Darcy, S., Legg, D., & Gilbert, K. (2013). Beyond Olympic legacy : Understanding Paralympic legacy through a thematic analysis. Journal of Sport Management, 27, 329–341.
Misener, L. & Mason, D. (2006). Developing local citizenship through sporting events: Balancing community involvement and tourism development. Current Issues in Tourism, 9(4), 384–398. doi:10.2167/cit263.0.
Misener, L. & Mason, D. S. (2008). Urban regimes and the sporting events agenda: A cross national comparison of civic development strategies. Journal of Sport Management, 22, 603–627.
Misener, L. & Mason, D. S. (2009). Fostering community development through sporting events strategies: An examination of urban regime perceptions. Journal of Sport Management, 23(6), 770–794.
Misener, L. & Mason, D. S. (2010). Towards a community centred approach to corporate community involvement in the sporting. Journal of Management & Organization, 16(4), 495–514.
O’Brien, D. & Chalip, L. (2007). Executive training exercise in sport event leverage. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 1(4), 296–304. doi:10.1108/17506180710824181.
Preuss, H. (2005). The economic impact of visitors at major multi-sport events. European Sport Management Quarterly, 5(3), 281–301.
Prince, M. J. (2004). Disability, disability studies and citizenship: Moving up or off the sociological agenda? Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29(3), 459–467.
Ramchandani, G. M. (2012). The inspirational effects of three major sport events. International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 3(3), 257–271. doi:10.1108/17582951211262693.
Rowe, D. & McGuirk, P. (1999). Drunk for three weeks: Sporting success and city image. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 34(2), 125–141.
Shapiro, D. R. & Pitts, B. G. (2014). What little do we know: Content analysis of disability sport in sport management literature. Journal of Sport Management, 28(6), 657–671. doi:10.1123/JSM.2013-0258.
Taks, M., Green, B. C., Misener, L., & Chalip, L. (2014). Evaluating sport development outcomes: The case of a medium-sized international sport event. European Sport Management Quarterly, 14(3), 213–237. doi:10.1080/16184742.2014.882370.
Thomas, C. (2004). How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disability & Society, 19(6), 569–583. doi:10.1080/0968759042000252506.
Ward, K. (2003). Entrepreneurial urbanism, state restructuring and civilizing ‘new’ east Manchester. Area, 35(2), 116–127.
Weed, M. & Dowse, S. (2009). A missed opportunity waiting to happen? The social legacy potential of the London 2012 Paralympic Games. Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure and Events, 1(2), 170–174. doi: 10.1080/19407960902992241.
Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Ziakas, V. (2014). For the benefit of all? Developing a critical perspective in mega-event leverage. Leisure Studies. doi:10.1080/02614367.2014.986507.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Misener, L., McGillivray, D., McPherson, G., Legg, D. (2016). Examining Parasport Events Through the Lens of Critical Disability Studies. In: R Lamond, I., Platt, L. (eds) Critical Event Studies. Leisure Studies in a Global Era. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52386-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52386-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52384-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52386-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)