Journalism, Climate Change, Justice and Solidarity: Editorializing the IPCC AR5

  • Anna Roosvall


Justice is a significant undercurrent in journalism and in international politics on climate change. Yet it is too seldom explicitly discussed or problematized in these contexts. This largely theoretical and explorative chapter heeds the re-thinking of justice, responsibility and solidarity in a globalizing world, as expressed in political philosophy as well as in media studies. The international politics of climate change are most pertinently discussed and evaluated in editorials, which provide the research material for this chapter. In qualitatively examined example editorials from high-income countries, the discourse calls for global action while concurrently applying diverse versions of domestication. The editorials use strong obligation modality language (something “must” be done), refer to responsibility and justice, but do not specify the injustice or what should be done to amend it. The discourse does not (yet) reassess economic privilege or the dynamics of political representation. It is a solidaritarian discourse, but only vaguely so due to lack of specifications.


Climate Change Effect Global Action Globalizing World Political Representation International Politics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Askanius, T., & Uldam, J. (2012). Online social media for radical politics: Climate change activism on YouTube. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 4(1–2), 69–84.Google Scholar
  2. Bullard, R. (1990). Dumping in dixie: Race, class, and environmental quality. San Francisco: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  3. Caney, S. (2005). Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility and global climate change. Leiden Journal of International Law, 18, 747–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chouliaraki, L. (2011). Improper distance: Towards a critical account of solidarity as irony. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 4, 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chouliaraki, L. (2013). The ironic spectator: Solidarity in the age of post-humanitarianism. Cambridge, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  7. de Chavez, R., & Tauli-Corpuz, V. (2009). Guide on climate change and indigenous peoples. Baguio City, Phillipines: Tebtebba Foundation.Google Scholar
  8. de Onís, K. (2012). Looking both ways: Metaphor and the rhetorical alignment of intersectional climate justice and reproductive justice concerns. Environmental Communication, 6(3), 308–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deuze, M. (2005). What is journalism? Professional identity and ideology of journalists reconsidered. Journalism, 6(4), 442–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eide, E. (2012). An editorial that shook the world: global solidarity vs. editorial autonomy. In E. Eide & R. Kunelius (Eds.), Media meets climate: The global challenge for journalism (pp. 125–143). Gothenburg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  11. Fenton, N. (2008). Mediating solidarity. Global Media and Communication, 4(1), 37–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition: Overcoming displacement and reification in cultural politics. New Left Review, 3, 107–120.Google Scholar
  14. Fraser, N. (2008). Scales of justice: Reimagining political space in a globalizing world. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fraser, N. (2014). Transnationalizing the public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficiency of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world. In K. Nash (Ed.), Transnationalizing the public sphere (pp. 8–42). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  16. Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition: A political-philosophical exchange. London: Verso.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraser, N., & Olson, K. (Eds.). (2008). Adding insult to injury: Nancy Fraser debates her critics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  18. Global Challenges Foundation. (2014, September 22). Fyra av fem anser att klimatförändringen hotar mäsnkligheten [Four out of five believe climate change threatens humanity]. Retrieved from
  19. Kössler, R., & Melber, H. (2007). International civil society and the challenge for global solidarity. Development Dialogue, 49, 29–39.Google Scholar
  20. Kunelius, R. (2012). Varieties of realism: Durban editorials and the discursive landscape of global climate politics. In E. Eide & R. Kunelius (Eds.), Media meets climate: The global challenge for journalism (pp. 31–48). Gothenburg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  21. Larsson, E. (2015). Svensk dagstidningsbevakning av klimatförändringar [Swedish daily press coverage of climate change]. Bachelor thesis, Örebro University, Örebro.Google Scholar
  22. Liedman, S. E. (1999). Att se sig själv i andra: Om solidaritet [To see yourself in others: On solidarity]. Stockholm: Bonniers.Google Scholar
  23. Nash, K. (Ed.). (2014). Transnationalizing the public sphere. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Nord, L. (1998). Makten bakom orden: En studie av ledarsidor och ledarskrivande i svensk dagspress [The power behind the words: A study of editorials and editorial writing in the Swedish daily press]. Stockholm: JMK.Google Scholar
  25. Nord, L. (2001). Vår tids ledare. In En studie av den svenska dagspressens politiska opinionsbildning [The editorials of our time: A study of political opinion in the Swedish daily press]. Stockholm: Carlssons.Google Scholar
  26. Nussbaum, M. C. (2013). Foreword. In I. M. Young (Ed.), Responsibility for justice (pp. ix–xxv). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Olausson, U. (2014). The diversified nature of “domesticated” news discourse: The case of climate change in national news media. Journalism Studies, 15(6), 711–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Owen, D. (2014). Dilemmas of inclusion: The all-effected principle, the all-subjected principle, and transnational public spheres. In K. Nash (Ed.), Transnationalizing the public sphere (pp. 112–128). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  29. Page, E. (2006). Climate change, justice and future generations. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rao, S., & Wasserman, H. (Eds.). (2015). Media ethics and justice in the age of globalization. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rhaman, M. (2014). Justice delayed-justice denied: Framing climate justice in Bangladeshi newspaper journalism during COPs. In B. León (Ed.), Communicating climate change: From global agenda to media representation (pp. 179–212). Salamanca: Comunicación Social.Google Scholar
  33. Roosvall, A. (2014a). Beyond dialogue: Exploring solidarity as a mode of communication through a debate on readers’ comments to online news. Northern Lights: Film and Media Studies Yearbook, 12(1), 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Roosvall, A. (2014b). The identity politics of world news: Oneness, particularity, identity and status in online slideshows. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 17(1), 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roosvall, A., & Tegelberg, M. (2012). Misframing the messenger: Scales of justice, traditional ecological knowledge and media coverage of indigenous peoples and climate change. In E. Eide & R. Kunelius (Eds.), Media meets climate: The global challenge for journalism (pp. 297–312). Gothenburg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  36. Roosvall, A., & Tegelberg, M. (2015). Media and the geographies of climate justice: Indigenous peoples, nature and the geopolitics of climate change. TripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 13(1), 39–54.Google Scholar
  37. Segerberg, A., & Bennett, W. L. (2011). Social media and the organization of collective action: Using Twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. Communication Review, 14(3), 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Harvard: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Shepard, P., & Corbin-Mark, C. (2009). Climate justice. Environmental Justice, 2(4), 163–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shue, H. (2014). Climate justice: Vulnerability and protection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Silverstone, R. (2007). Media and morality: On the rise of the mediapolis. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  42. Smiley, M. (2010). Collective responsibility. On Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy web page of Stanford University Press. Retrieved from
  43. Uldam, J., & Askanius, T. (2013). Online civic cultures: Debating climate change activism on YouTube. International Journal of Communication, 7, 1185–1204.Google Scholar
  44. Young, I. M. (2013). Responsibility for justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Ytterstad, A., & Russell, A. (2012). Pessimism of the intellect and optimism of the will: A Gramscian analysis of climate justice in summit coverage. In E. Eide & R. Kunelius (Eds.), Media meets climate: The global challenge for journalism (pp. 247–262). Gothenburg: Nordicom.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna Roosvall
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Media StudiesStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations