Skip to main content

The Construction of a Collective Identity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 602 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the construction of collective identities in elite schools. It examines how elite schools encourage bonding and collectivism on a daily basis. Through their practices, including team sports and charity work, they give students a strong sense of mutual loyalty, cohesiveness and social boundaries. Collective identities are constructed in opposition to the social ‘other’, who is excluded and treated as morally and intellectually inferior. Collectivism and exclusionary practices are prolonged in adult life, translating into a propensity to associate, socialize and marry within the same circles. Elite schools foster and legitimate exclusionary behaviors and help reinforce class boundaries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Several interviewees had witnessed or undergone various forms of mild bullying. We can speculate that principals’ determination to tackle bullying is a recent phenomenon, as bullying and its impact only recently became a key focus of educational research.

  2. 2.

    In 2000, former students of Blackrock College were involved in a case of manslaughter, which became known as the Annabel Case, from the name of a local nightclub. They allegedly turned to the principal of Blackrock for advice before informing the police of the situation.

  3. 3.

    To Pinçon and Pinçon-Charlot, fear of improper alliances is what motivates upper-class parents to choose private education for their children, in particular when they become teenagers. Baltzell (1966), Mills (1956) and other elite researchers view kinship ties as an important factor in elite cohesiveness.

Bibliography

  • Allan, A. and Charles, C. (2014) ‘Cosmo Girls: Configurations of Class and Femininity in Elite Educational Settings’. British Journal of Sociology of Education 34(3): 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltzell, D. E. (1966) Philadelphia Gentlemen: the Making of a National Upper Class. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E. (2007) The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993b) ‘How Can One Be a Sportsman?’ in Sociology in Question (pp. 117–131). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1996) The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.-C. (1977) Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture London: Sage, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clancy, P., O’Connor, N. and Dillon, K. (2010) TASC Report on the Golden Circle. Dublin: TASC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cookson, P. W. and Persell, C. H. (1985) Preparing for Power: America’s Elite Boarding Schools. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtois, A. (2015b) ‘Internationalising Practices and Representations of the ‘Other’ in Second-Level Elite Schools in Ireland’. Globalisation, Societies and Education (REF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffel, N. (2000) The Making of Them: The British Attitude to Children and the Boarding School System. London: Lone Arrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faguer, J.-P. (1991) ‘Les effets d’une éducation totale: Un collège jésuite en 1960ʹ [The effects of a total education: A Jesuit school in 1960]. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 86–87:25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961) ‘The Characteristics of Total Institutions’ in Etzioni, A. (ed.), Complex Organisations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1967) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanks, M. P. and Eckland, B. K. (1976) ‘Athletics and Social Participation in the Educational Attainment Process’. Sociology of Education 49(4): 271–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. (2008) Social Identity. London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenway, J. and Fahey, J. (2015) ‘The Gift Economy of Elite Schooling: The Changing Contours and Contradictions of Privileged Benefaction’. British Journal of Sociology of Education 36(1): 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. and Fournier, M. (1992) ‘Introduction’ in Lamont, M. and Fournier, M. (eds.) Cultivating Differences: Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality (pp. 1–18). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, S. (2005) ‘Disgusted Subjects: The Making of Middle-Class Identities’. The Sociological Review 53(3): 429–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, M. (2002) The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1956) The Power Elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Flynn, G. and Petersen, E. B. (2007) ‘The “Good Life” and the “Rich Portfolio”: Young Women, Schooling and Neoliberal Subjectification’. British Journal of Sociology 28(4): 459–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinçon, M. and Pinçon-Charlot, M. (2007a) Sociologie de la bourgeoisie [Sociology of the bourgeoisie]. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinçon, M., & Pinçon-Charlot, M. (2007b). Les Ghettos du Gotha: Comment la bourgeoisie défend ses espaces [The ghettos of the high society: How the bourgeoisie defends its territory]. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D., David, M. and Ball, S. J. (2001) ‘Making a Difference? Institutional Habituses and Higher Education Choice’ in Sociological Research Online 5(4), <http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/4/reay.html>

  • Skeggs, B. (1997) Formations of Class and Gender: Becoming Respectable. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Testanière, J. (1967) ‘Chahut traditionnel et chahut anomique dans l’enseignement secondaire’ [Traditional unruliness and anomic unruliness in secondary education] in Revue française de sociologie 1: 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, I. (2008) ‘Chav Mum, Chav Scum’. Feminist Media Studies 8(1): 17–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakeford, J. (1969) The Cloistered Elite: A Sociological Analysis of the English Public Boarding School. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, G. K. (1980) A History of St. Columba’s College. Dublin: Old Columban Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. L. (2000) ‘School Extracurricular Activity Participation as a Moderator in the Development of Antisocial Patterns.’ Child Development 71(2): 502–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weis, L. and Cipollone, K. (2013) ‘Class Work: Producing Privilege and Social Mobility in Elite US Secondary Schools’. British Journal of Sociology of Education 34(5–6): 701–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff, W. (1967) Who Rules America? Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Courtois, A. (2018). The Construction of a Collective Identity. In: Elite Schooling and Social Inequality. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52277-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52277-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52276-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52277-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics