Abstract
This chapter will elaborate on the domestic discourse of social capital and civil society in post-Soviet Uzbekistan. This chapter focuses on the works by local academics and political leaders on civil society and its forms in Uzbekistan. The chapter demonstrates that this field has received constant attention in both the official and scholarly literatures since the 1990s, and as the political elite strives to promote its own postulation of an evolutionary transition “from a strong state to a strong civil society”, interest in the subject among local intellectuals remains high.
The fact that the administrators and intellectuals are claiming their own models of civil society and social capital should not be underestimated because without understanding how the local conception of civil society is formed in relation to history, culture and power relations, it is difficult to examine the real nature of the sociopolitical environment in Uzbekistan. This chapter therefore highlights an alternative vision of civil society and social capital, which moves beyond Western-centric approaches to this matter. The aim of this chapter is to summarize some notable publications by local intellectuals in the Uzbek and Russian languages. Using the case study of Uzbekistan, this chapter also offers a model of how democratizing states are using social capital and civil society institutions to strengthen their legitimacy and increase the efficiency of their governance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsBibliography
Abdusattorov, T. (2011). Kuchli Fuqarolik Jamiyatini Barpo Etishda Ijtimoiy Adolat (The role of social justice in promoting a strong civil society). Fuqarolik Jamiyati, 1, 4–7.
Alagappa, M. (Ed.). (2004). Civil society and political change in Asia. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Casier, T. (1999). The shattered horizon: How ideology mattered to soviet politics. Studies in East European Thought, 51(1), 35–36.
Ergashev, B. (2004). Civil forums in Central Asia: Goals, specifics, potential. Central Asia and the Caucasus, 27(3), 7–14.
Fukuyama, F. (1993). The end of history and the last man (p. 216). New York: Harper Perennial.
Fukuyama, F. (2004). State building: Governance and world order in the 21st century. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Gadoyboev, A., & Rahimov, S. (2003). Oltin O’tda, Odam Mahallada Toblanadi (Gold shines in the flame, man shines in the Mahalla). Tashkent: Yangi Asr Avlodi.
Islamov, Z. (2004). Grazhdanskoe Obshestvo: Vchera, Segodnia, Zavtra (Civil society: Yesterday, today, tomorrow). In Alimov (Ed.), O‘zbekiston: Fuqarolik Jamiyati Sari (Uzbekistan towards civil society) (pp. 53–59). Tashkent: Institute for Strategic and Regional Studies.
Karimov, I. (1995). Vatan—Sajdagoh kabi Muqaddasdir (The Homeland is as sacred as a place of prayer). Tashkent: O’zbekiston.
Karimov, I. (1997). Uzbekistan Na Poroge XXI Veka: Ugrozi Bezopasnosti, Usloviya i Garantii Progressa (Uzbekistan on the Threshold of the twenty-first century: Challenges to stability and progress). Moscow: Drofa.
Karimov, I. (2002). Xavfsizlik va Tinchlik Uchun Kurashmoq Kerak (The need to strive for security and peace). Tashkent: O’zbekiston.
Keane, J. (1998). Civil society: Old images, new visions. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Khuseynova, A. (2009). Fuqarolik Jamiyati: Tushunchasi va Genezisi (Civil society: Notion and genesis). Demokratlashtirish va Inson Huquqlari, 4, 27–30.
Kimairis, T.-L. (2010). Civil society and social capital in Central Asia. In H. K. Anheier, S. Toepler, & R. List (Eds.), International encyclopedia of civil society (pp. 236–241). New York: Springer.
Levine, D. (Ed.). (1972). Georg Simmel on individuality and social forms. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levitin, L. (2001). Uzbekistan na Istoricheskom Povorote (Uzbekistan on a historicalthreshold) (p. 307). Moscow: Vagrius.
Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1), 28–51.
Mamatov, Kh. (2010). Oznovnie Pokazateli Urovnya Razvitiya Grajdanskogo Obshestva: Postanovka Problemi. (The main parameters of the development of civil society: Formulation of the problem). Fuqarolik Jamiyati, 1, 57–62.
March, A. (2003). State ideology and the legitimation of authoritarianism: The case of Post-Soviet Uzbekistan. Journal of Political Ideologies, 8(2), 209–232.
Mercer, C. (2002). NGOs, civil society and democratization: A critical review of the literature. Progress in Development Studies, 2(1), 8.
Narozhna, T. (2004). Civil society in the Post-Communist context: Linking theoretical concept and social transformation. Demokratizatsiya, 12(2), 296.
Odilqoriev, H. (2002). Konstitutsiya va Fuqarolik Jamiyat (The constitution and civil society) (pp. 164–173). Tashkent: Sharq.
Qirgizboev, M. (2010). Fuqarolik Jamiyati: Genezisi, Shakllanishi va Rivojlanishi (Civil society: Its genesis, formation and development). Tashkent: O’zbekiston.
Saidov, A. (2003). Mahalla: Milliy Demokratik Instituti (Mahalla: A National Democratic Institution). Demokratlashtirish va Inson Huquqlari, 1, 96–103.
Sajoo, A. (Ed.). (2002). Civil society in the Muslim world: Contemporary perspectives. London: I.B. Tauris.
Schull, J. (1992). What is ideology? Theoretical problems and lessons from soviet-type societies. Political Studies, 40(4), 732.
Shadmanov, A. (2010). Formirovanie Grajdanskogo Obshestva v Uzbekistane (Formation of civil society in Uzbekistan). Demokratlashtirish va Inson Huquqlari, 1, 90–93.
Sharifkhodjaev, M. (2003). O’zbekistonda Ochiq Fuqarolik Jamiyatining Shallanishi (The formation of an open civil society in Uzbekistan). Tashkent: Sharq.
Sharifkhodjaev, M., & Akhunova, G. (2005). Mahalla Kak Institut Mestnogo Samoupravleniya (Mahalla as an Institution of local self-governance). Tashkent: TFI.
Sievers, W. E. (2002). Uzbekistan’s Mahalla: From soviet to absolutist residential community associations. The Journal of International and Comparative Law at Chicago-Kent, 2, 149.
Suda, M. (2006). The politics of civil society, Mahalla and NGOs: Uzbekistan. In I. Osamu & U. Tomohiko (Eds.), Reconstruction and interaction of Slavic Eurasia and its neighboring worlds (pp. 335–336). Sapporo: Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido University.
Tangriev, L. (2000). Mustaqillik va Jamoat Tashkilotlari (Public Associations Since Independence). Tashkent: Yangi Asr Avlodi.
Tolipov, F. (2008). Uzbekistan: Sovetskiy Sindrom v Gosudarstve, Obshestve i Ideologii (Uzbekistan: Soviet syndrome in the state, society, and ideology). Tsentralnaya Aziya i Kavkaz, 6(54).
Turaqulov, M. (2003). O’zbekistonda Fuqarolik Jamiyati Asoslarining Shakllantirish Jarayonlari (The process of formation of the foundations of civil society in Uzbekistan). O’zbekistonda Ijtimoiy Fanlar, 1–2, 3–8.
USAID. (2004). Civil society groups and political parties. Supporting constructive relationships (p. 7). Washington, DC: USAID Occasional Papers Series.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ismailov, M. (2017). Domestic Discourse on Civil Society and Social Capital. In: Dadabaev, T., Ismailov, M., Tsujinaka, Y. (eds) Social Capital Construction and Governance in Central Asia. Politics and History in Central Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52233-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52233-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-52232-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-52233-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)