Citizenship and Maternalism in Migrant Domestic Labour: Filipina Workers and Their Employers in Amsterdam and Rome

  • Sabrina Marchetti
Chapter
Part of the Citizenship, Gender and Diversity book series (FEMCIT)

Abstract

This chapter contributes to the debate on family-like relationships in paid domestic work by drawing attention to the issue of the ‘maternalistic’ attitudes that are at play between migrant employees and non-migrant employers. It examines the ways in which a lack of citizenship rights on the part of migrant workers, resulting from being either temporary or undocumented migrants in Europe, influences their relationship with their female employers. The analysis is based on the case of Filipina women employed as domestic workers in Amsterdam and Rome and demonstrates how the migrants’ lack of citizenship rights reinforces maternalistic relationships with their employers.

References

  1. Ambrosini, M. (2014). Parenting from a distance and processes of family reunification: A research on the Italian case. Ethnicities, 15, 440–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (2000). Doing the dirty work? The global politics of domestic labor. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, B. (2014). Nations, migration and domestic labour: The case of the UK. Women’s Studies International Forum, 46, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnado, J. M. (2003). Maternalism in mistress-maid relations: The Philippine experience. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 4(3), 154–177.Google Scholar
  5. Banfi, L. (2008). Lavoro domestico, politiche migratorie e immigrazione filippina. Un confronto tra Canada e Italia. Polis, 22, 5–34.Google Scholar
  6. Basa, C., De Guzman, V., & Marchetti, S. (2012). International migration and over-indebtedness: The case of Filipino workers in Italy. IIED—Human Settlements Working Paper, 36.Google Scholar
  7. Bauböck, R. (2011). Temporary migrants, partial citizenship and hypermigration. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 14(5), 665–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bosniak, L. (2008). The citizen and the alien: Dilemmas of contemporary membership. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Botman, S. (2011). Gewoon schoonmaken: de troebele arbeidsrelaties in betaald huishoudelijk werk. Doctoral thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  10. Cock, J. (1989). Maids and madams: Domestic workers under apartheid. London: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cominelli, C. (2003). Filippini nel settore domestico: i limiti di una integrazione subalterna. Sociologia del lavoro, 89, 52–67.Google Scholar
  12. Constable, N. (1997). Maid to order in Hong Kong: Stories of Filipina workers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Constable, N. (2009). Migrant workers and the many states of protest in Hong Kong. Critical Asian Studies, 41, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fraser, N. (2003). Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition and participation. In N. Fraser & A. Honneth (Eds.), Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  15. Gutierrez-Rodríguez, E. (2010). Migration, domestic work and affect: A decolonist approach on value and the feminization of labour. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Hall, T., & Williamson, H. (1999). Citizenship and community. New York: Youth Work Press.Google Scholar
  17. INPS. (2012). Osservatorio lavoratori domestici. Retrieved February 2, 2014, from http://www.inps.it/webidentity/banchedatistatistiche/domestici/index01.jsp
  18. Isin, E. F., & Nielsen, G. M. (2008). Acts of citizenship. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  19. Isin, E. F., Nyers, P., & Turner, B. S. (2013). Citizenship between past and future. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  20. Joppke, C. (2007). Transformation of citizenship: Status, rights, identity. Citizenship Studies, 11(1), 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaplan, E. (1987). “I don’t do no windows”: Competition between the domestic worker and the housewife. In V. Miner & H. E. Longino (Eds.), Competition: A feminist taboo. New York: The Feminist Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kofman, E. (2005). Citizenship, migration and the reassertion of national identity. Citizenship Studies, 9(5), 453–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lan, P. C. (2006). Global cinderellas: Migrant domestic workers and newly rich employers in Taiwan. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lister, R., et al. (2007). Gendering citizenship in Western Europe: New challenges for citizenship research in a cross-national context. New York: Policy.Google Scholar
  25. Locher-Scholten, E. (2000). Women and the colonial state: Essays on gender and modernity in the Netherlands Indies, 1900–1942. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lutz, H. (2011). The new maids: Transnational women and the care economy. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  27. Magat, M. (2004). Women breadwinners in the margins: Filipina domestic workers in Rome, Italy. In A. Fauve-Chamoux (Ed.), Domestic service and the formation of European identity. Understanding the globalization of domestic work, 16th–21st Centuries. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  28. Marchetti, S. (2006). ‘We had different fortunes’: Relationships between Filipina domestic workers and their employers in Rome and Amsterdam. Master’s thesis, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  29. Mezzadra, S. (2006). Diritto di fuga: Migrazioni, cittadinanza, globalizzazione. Verona: Ombre Corte.Google Scholar
  30. Mouffe, C. (1992). Feminism, citizenship and radical democratic politics. In J. Butler & J. W. Scott (Eds.), Feminists theorize the political. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Näre, L. (2011). The moral economy of domestic and care labour: Migrant workers in Naples, Italy. Sociology, 45(3), 396–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ong, A. (1993). On the endge of empires: Flexible citizenship among Chinese in diaspora. Positions, 1(3), 745–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as exception: Mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parreñas, R. S. (2001). Servants of globalization: Women, migration and domestic work. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Parreñas, R. S. (2008). The force of domesticity: Filipina migrants and globalization. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Pratt, G. (2012). Families apart: Migrant mothers and the conflicts of labor and love. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ray, R., & Qayum, S. (2009). Cultures of servitude: Modernity, domesticity, and class in India. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rollins, J. (1985). Between women: Domestics and their employers. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Romero, M. (1992). Maid in the U.S.A. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Rothenberg, P. (2000). Invisible privilege: A memory about race, class and gender. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  41. Sarti, R. (2005). Freedom and citizenship? The legal status of servants and domestic workers in a comparative perspective (16th–21st centuries). In S. Pasleau & I. Schopp (Eds.), Proceedings of the servant project. Liège: Editions de l’université de Liège (Vol. 3, pp. 127–164).Google Scholar
  42. Triandafyllidou, A. (2013). Irregular migrant domestic workers in Europe: Who cares? Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  43. Tubadji, P. J. M., Nijkamp, D., Gheasi, M., & Rietveld, P. (2014). A study on undocumented migrant workers in the Dutch household sector. International Journal of Manpower, 35, 103–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Van Walsum, S. (2011). Regulating migrant domestic work in the Netherlands: Opportunities and pitfalls. Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 23(1), 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yeates, N. (2009). Globalizing care economies and migrant workers: Explorations in global care chains. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  46. Yoeh, B., & S. Huang. (1999). Singapore women and foreign domestic workers: Negotiating domestic work and motherhood. In J. H. Momsen (Ed.), Gender, migration, and domestic service. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Yuval-Davis, N. (1999). The “multi-layered citizen”. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 1(1), 119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zontini, E. (2010). Transnational families, migration and gender: Moroccan and Filipino women in Bologna and Barcelona. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabrina Marchetti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Cultural HeritageCa’ Foscari University of VeniceVeniceItaly

Personalised recommendations