Advertisement

The Incorrigible Subject: The Autonomy of Migration and the US Immigration Stalemate

  • Nicholas De Genova
Chapter

Abstract

The techniques of contemporary regimes of border policing and immigration law enforcement along the US-Mexican border are only apprehensible in relation to another reality: the embodied materiality of ‘illegal’ migrants. These humble border crossers are the ‘incorrigible’ subject of virtually all contemporary border regimes. As autonomous subjects, with their own aspirations, needs, and desires, which necessarily exceed any regime of immigration and citizenship, migrants’ mobility projects enact an elementary freedom of movement to which borders are intrinsically a response. Rather than defining borders as exclusionary apparatuses, it thus becomes crucial to perceive the contradictory processes of subordinate inclusion mediated by border controls. In consideration of these complications, De Genova’s chapter sheds light on the current US immigration stalemate and the political struggles of ‘illegal’ migrants.

Keywords

Migrant Labor Undocumented Migrant Border Control Border Patrol Border Enforcement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Andersson, R. (2012). A game of risk: Boat migration and the business of bordering Europe. Anthropology Today, 28(6), 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson, R. (2014a). Hunter and Prey: Patrolling Clandestine migration in the Euro-African Borderlands. Anthropological Quarterly, 87(1), 119–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, R. (2014b). Illegality, Inc.: Clandestine migration and the business of bordering Europe. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Arendt, H. (1968). The origins of totalitarianism. New York: Harvest/Harcourt.Google Scholar
  5. Bonefeld, W. (1995). Capital as subject and the existence of labour. In W. Bonefeld, R. Gunn, J. Holloway, & K. Psychopedis (Eds.), Emancipating Marx: Open Marxism 3. East Haven: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bredeloup, S. (2012). Sahara transit: Times, spaces, people. Population, Space and Place, 18(4), 457–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burawoy, M. (1976). The functions and reproduction of migrant labor: Comparative material from Southern Africa and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 81(5), 1050–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Genova, N. (2002). Migrant ‘illegality’ and deportability in everyday life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 419–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Genova, N. (2004). The legal production of Mexican/migrant ‘illegality’. Latino Studies, 2(1), 160–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Genova, N. (2005). Working the boundaries: Race, space, and ‘illegality’ in Mexican Chicago. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Genova, N. (2009). Conflicts of mobility, and the mobility of conflict: Rightlessness, presence, subjectivity, freedom. Subjectivity, 29, 445–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Genova, N. (2010a). The management of ‘quality’: Class decomposition and racial formation in a Chicago factory. Dialectical Anthropology, 34(2), 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Genova, N. (2010b). The queer politics of migration: Reflections on ‘illegality’ and incorrigibility. Studies in Social Justice, 4(2), 101–126.Google Scholar
  14. De Genova, N. (2012). Border, scene and obscene. In T. Wilson & H. Donnan (Eds.), A companion to border studies. Oxford/Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. De Genova, N. (2013a). Spectacles of migrant ‘Illegality’: The scene of exclusion, the obscene of inclusion. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(7), 1180–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Genova, N. (2013b). ‘We are of the connections’: Migration, methodological nationalism, and ‘militant research’. Postcolonial Studies, 16(3), 250–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Downes, L. (2013, December 7). Borderline insanity at the fence in Nogales. New York Times, [Online]. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/08/opinion/sunday/borderline-insanity-at-the-fence-in-nogales.html?pagewanted=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20131208. Accessed 7 Nov 2014.
  18. Dunn, T. J. (2009). Blockading the border and human rights: The El Paso operation that remade immigration enforcement. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  19. Durand, J., & Massey, D. S. (2004). Crossing the border: Research from the Mexican Migration Project. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. Gilmore, R. W. (2007). Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Heyman, J. (2004). Ports of entry as nodes in the world system. Identities, 11(3), 303–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holloway, J. (1994). Global capital and the national state. Capital and Class, 52, 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holloway, J. (1995). From scream of refusal to scream of power: The centrality of work. In W. Bonefeld, R. Gunn, J. Holloway, & K. Psychopedis (Eds.), Emancipating Marx: Open Marxism 3. East Haven: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kearney, M. (2004). The classifying and value-filtering missions of borders. Anthropological Theory, 4(2), 131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khosravi, S. (2010). ‘Illegal’ traveller: An auto-ethnography of borders. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Lecadet, C. (2013). From migrant Destitution to self-organization into transitory national communities: The revival of citizenship in post-deportation experience in Mali. In B. Anderson, M. Gibney, & E. Paoletti (Eds.), The social, political and historical contours of deportation. New York/London: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A critique of political economy (Vol. 1). New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  28. Massey, D. S. (2005). Backfire at the border: Why enforcement without legalization cannot stop illegal immigration. In Trade policy analysis (Vol. 29). Washington, DC: Center for Trade Policy Studies, Cato Institute.Google Scholar
  29. Mezzadra, S. (2001). Diritto di fuga: Migrazioni, cittadinanza, globalizzazione. Verona: Ombre corte.Google Scholar
  30. Mezzadra, S. (2004). The right to escape. Ephemera, 4(3), 267–275, [Online]. Available: http://www.ephemerajournal.org/sites/default/files/4-3mezzadra.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2014.
  31. Mitropoulos, A. (2006). Autonomy, recognition, movement. The Commoner, 11, 5–14.Google Scholar
  32. Moulier Boutang, Y. (1998). De l’esclavage au salariat. Economie historique du salariat bridé. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  33. Moulier Boutang, Y. (2001). Between the hatred of all walls and the walls of hate: The minoritarian diagonal of mobility. In M. Morris & B. de Bary (Eds.), ‘Race’ panic and the memory of migration. Aberdeen/Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Moulier-Boutang, Y. (with Grelet, S.). (2001). The art of flight: An interview with Yann Moulier-Boutang. Rethinking Marxism, 13(3/4), 227–235.Google Scholar
  35. Nevins, J. (2010). Operation gatekeeper and beyond: The war on ‘illegals’ and the remaking of the U.S.-Mexico boundary. Updated Second Edition of Operation Gatekeeper: The Rise of the ‘Illegal Alien’ and the Remaking of the US-Mexico Boundary, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Obama, B. (with Romney, M.) (2013). Town Hall debate transcript (16 October 2012). In CQ Press (Ed.), Historic documents of 2012. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Obama, B. (2014, November 20). Remarks by the President in address to the nation on immigration. The White House: Office of the Press Secretary, [Online]. Available: https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/11/20/remarks-president-address-nation-immigration. Accessed 7 Nov 2014.
  38. Preston, J. (2013, December 22). Amid steady deportation, fear and worry multiply among immigrants. New York Times, [Online]. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/23/us/fears-multiply-amid-a-surge-in-deportation.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20131223&_r=0. Accessed 7 Nov 2014.
  39. Rancière, J. (1999). Dis-agreement: Politics and philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rancière, J. (2004). Who is the subject of the rights of man? South Atlantic Quarterly, 103(2/3), 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Roediger, D. R., & Esch, E. D. (2012). The production of difference: Race and the management of labor in U.S. history. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Shear, M.D. (2014, December 20). Obama, daring congress, acts to overhaul immigration. New York Times, [Online]. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/21/us/obama-immigration-speech.html?emc=edit_th_20141121&nl=todaysheadlines&nlid=44765954. Accessed 7 Nov 2014.
  43. Stephen, L. (2008). Los Nuevos Desaparecidos: Immigration, militarization, death, and disappearance on Mexico’s Borders. In B. Sutton, S. Morgen, & J. Novkov (Eds.), Security disarmed: Critical perspectives on gender, race, and militarization. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Thompson, G., & Cohen, S. (2014, April 6). More deportations follow minor crimes, records show. New York Times, [Online]. Available: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/07/us/more-deportations-follow-minor-crimes-data-shows.html. Accessed 7 Nov 2014.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas De Genova
    • 1
  1. 1.ChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations