Skip to main content

Reshaping the Role of the Tribunal as Third Party in Australian Workplace Conflict Resolution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reframing Resolution

Abstract

In common with courts and tribunals in other developed countries, Australia has experienced the rise of the self-represented litigant. This chapter examines innovations in the approaches taken by the Australian Fair Work Commission (FWC), the national employment relations tribunal, in responding to the growing number of self-represented employers and employees appearing before it or seeking redress. In particular, the chapter explores and discusses the shift towards alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and an increasing number of self-help initiatives in the context of the growing individualization of the Australian labour market and the consequent rise of self-represented litigants before the tribunal. These changes are reshaping the role of the tribunal as a third party in Australian workplace conflict resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aston, J., Hill, D., & Djan Tackey, N. (2006). The experience of claimants in race discrimination Employment Tribunal cases. Department for Trade & Industry Employment Relations Research Series, No. 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Innovative Justice. (2013). Report for Fair Work Commission assessment of cooling off period pilot in unfair dismissals conciliation process. https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/documents/dismissals/cooling-off-period-assessment.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept 2015.

  • Creswell, J.W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, B., & Dix, G. (2011). The dispute resolution regulations two years on: The Acas experience. Acas Research Paper, 07/11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, L. (2014). The coalition government’s reforms to employment tribunals and statutory employment rights – Echoes of the past. Industrial Relations Journal, 45(3), 234–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dix, G., Sisson, K., & Forth, J. (2009). Conflict at work: The changing pattern of disputes. In W. Brown, A. Bryson, J. Forth, & K. Whitfield (Eds.), The evolution of the modern workplace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downer, M., Harding, C., Ghezelayagh, S., Fu, E., & Gkiza, M. (2015). Evaluation of Acas early conciliation 2015. Acas Research Paper, 04/15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fair Work Commission. (2014a). Annual Report 2013–2014: Australia’s national workplace relations tribunal. Melbourne, VIC: Fair Work Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fair Work Commission. (2014b). What happens at a Conciliation?. Virtual Video Tour Series. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHX6zFcvX3M. Accessed 24 Sept 2015.

  • Fair Work Commission. (2015). Continuing the change program: Future directions 2014–15 progress report. Available from: https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/documents/media/fd2-continuing-change-program.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2015.

  • Faulks, J. (2013). Self-represented litigants: Tackling the challenge. Managing People in Court Conference, National Judicial College of Australia and the Australian National University. http://njca.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Justice-Faulks.pdf. Accessed 26 Sept 2015.

  • High Court of Australia. (2012). Annual report 2011–2012. Kingston, ON: ACT.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDermott, T., & Riley, J. (2012). ADR and industrial tribunals: Innovations and challenges in resolving individual workplace grievances. Monash University Law Review, 38(2), 82–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, R., Riley, J., & Stewart, A. (2013). Resolving disputes over employment rights in Australia. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 34(4), 843–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission. (2015). Workplace relations framework: Draft report. http://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/current/workplace-relations/draft. Accessed 25 Sept 2015.

  • Ross, J. I. (2014). Future directions – Improving institutional performance and the concept of ‘Public Value’. https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/speeches/IRSNSW-notes-24-May-2014.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2015.

  • Shilton, E., & Banks, K. (2014). The changing role of Labor Relations Board in Canada: Key research questions for the 21st century. Kingston, ON: Centre for Law in the Contemporary Workplace, Queen’s University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulruf, B., Woodhams, B., Howard, C., Johri, R., & Yee, B. (2009). Grievance gravy train picking up speed: Myths and reality around employment disputes in New Zealand. Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(2), 245–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souter, C. (2015, March). The future of Employment Tribunals. CAS Employment Newsletter, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • TNS Social Research. (2010). Fair Work Australia Unfair Dismissal Conciliation Research. Fyshwick, South Canberra: ACT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gramberg, G. (2006). Managing workplace conflict: ADR in Australian workplaces. Sydney, NSW: Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We wish to thank Dr. Robyn Cochrane for her assistance in coding and analysing the interviews and her help in managing the wider project on workplace dispute resolution in Australia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gramberg, B.V., Teicher, J., Bamber, G. (2016). Reshaping the Role of the Tribunal as Third Party in Australian Workplace Conflict Resolution. In: Saundry, R., Latreille, P., Ashman, I. (eds) Reframing Resolution. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51560-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics