Skip to main content

Introduction: Textures and Porosities of Journalistic Fields

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Journalism in the US and Germany

Part of the book series: Cultural Sociology ((CULTSOC))

  • 413 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter starts with an analysis of debates in leading US and German media outlets about the Snowden revelations of the difference between journalism and advocacy. It shows that these examples of journalistic metadiscourse are filtered through specific lenses of each occupational culture. This chapter then presents the theoretical framework of the analysis, which is mainly based on cultural sociology and field theory. A quick discussion of the data and methods used in this study is followed by an overview of the book, including its main findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Abbott, Andrew Delano. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albæk, Erik, Arjen Van Dalen, Nael Jebril, and Claes H. de Vreese. 2014a. Political journalism in comparative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Albæk, Erik, Arjen Van Dalen, Nael Jebril, and Claes H. de Vreese. 2014b. Political Journalism in Comparative Perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2006. The Civil Sphere. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2010. The Performance of Politics: Obama’s Victory and the Democratic Struggle for Power. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C., Bernhard Giesen, and Jason L. Mast. 2006. Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven Conn.: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, Rodney. 1999. “Field Theory in Comparative Context: A New Paradigm for Media Studies.” Theory and Society 28(3):463–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, Rodney. 2013. Shaping Immigration News: A French-American Comparison. New York: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, Rodney and Erik Neveu. 2005a. Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, Kai and Patrick Beuth. 2013. “Chaos Communcation Congress: Der Freiheitskämpfer Glenn Greenwald.” Zeit Online. Retrieved November 27, 2015 (http://www.zeit.de/digital/internet/2013-12/30c3-keynote-glenn-greenwald).

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre and Loïc J. D. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Matt. 2013. “Gone, But Not Forgotten.” Journalism Studies 15(1):33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, David. 2013a. “Journalism, Even When It’s Tilted.” The New York Times, June 30. Retrieved November 27, 2015 (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/01/business/media/journalism-is-still-at-work-even-when-its-practitioner-has-a-slant.html).

  • Carr, David. 2013b. “War on Leaks Is Pitting Journalist vs. Journalist.” The New York Times, August 25. Retrieved December 28, 2015 (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/26/business/media/war-on-leaks-is-pitting-journalist-vs-journalist.html).

  • Couldry, Nick. 2003. “Media Meta-Capital: Extending the Range of Bourdieu’s Field Theory.” Theory and Society 32(5-6):653–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingwall, Robert. 2008. Essays on Professions. Aldershot, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. [1957] 1992. Professional Ethics and Civic Morals. London; New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasoph, Nina and Paul Lichterman. 2003. “Culture in Interaction.” American Journal of Sociology 108(4):735–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser, Frank, Carsten Reinemann, and David Fan. 2001. “Spin Doctors in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany: Metacommunication about Media Manipulation.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 6(1):16–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischermann, Thomas. 2013. “Glenn Greenwald: Der Jäger Als Gejagter.” Die Zeit, August 29. Retrieved December 21, 2015 (http://www.zeit.de/2013/35/glenn-greenwald-edward-snowden).

  • Fligstein, Neil and Doug McAdam. 2012. A Theory of Fields. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, Eliot. 2001. Professionalism: The Third Logic. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, Lewis A., Thomas Hove, and Hernando Rojas. 2006. “The Networked Public Sphere.” Javnost-The Public 13:5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48(6):781–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh,: University of Edinburgh, Social Sciences Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hack, Günter. 2014. “Journalismus: Das Greenwald-Paradoxon.” ZEIT ONLINE. Retrieved November 27, 2015 (http://www.zeit.de/digital/datenschutz/2014-01/Greenwald-Journalisten-Aktivisten-Paradoxon).

  • Jacobs, Ronald N. and Eleanor Townsley. 2011. The Space of Opinion: Media Intellectuals and the Public Sphere. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Bill. 2013. “Is Glenn Greenwald the Future of News?” The New York Times, October 27. Retrieved December 11, 2015 (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/28/opinion/a-conversation-in-lieu-of-a-column.html).

  • Lamont, Michèle. 1992. Money, Morals, and Manners: The Culture of the French and American Upper-Middle Class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, Michèle and Laurent Thévenot. 2000a. “Introduction: Toward a Renewed Comparative Cultural Sociology.” Pp. 1–22 in Rethinking comparative cultural sociology: repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States, edited by M. Lamont and L. Thévenot. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanigan, RichardL. 1983. “Précis of Merleau-Ponty on Metajournalism.” Pp. 39–48 in Semiotics 1981, edited by J. Deely and M. Lenhart. Springer US. Retrieved (http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9328-7_5).

  • Larson, Magali Sarfatti. 1977. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyendecker, Hans. 2013a. “Einblick Ins Schattenreich.” Süddeutsche Zeitung, November 27, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1987. “Three Fragments From a Sociologist’s Notebooks: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials.” Annual Review of Sociology 13:1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NBC. 2013. Meet the Press: Snowden, National Security and Immigration Reform. Retrieved December 28, 2015 (http://www.nbcnews.com/video/meet-the-press/52288617).

  • Reed, Isaac. 2008. “Justifying Sociological Knowledge: From Realism to Interpretation.” Sociological Theory 26(2):101–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, Peter. 2014. “Snowden Reloaded.” Süddeutsche Zeitung, October 13, 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, Michael. 1978. Discovering the News: A Social History of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, Michael. 2005. “Autonomy from What?” Pp. 214–23 in Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field, edited by R. Benson and E. Neveu. Cambridge, Malden, MA: Politiy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Jane B. et al. 2011. Participatory Journalism: Guarding Open Gates at Online Newspapers. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K ; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Ryan J. and Teri Finneman. 2014. “Who Watches the Watchdogs?” Journalism Studies 15(2):172–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, Gaye. 1972. “Objectivity as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen’s Notions of Objectivity.” American Journal of Sociology 77(4):660–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Victor Witter. 1974. Dramas, Fields, and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waisbord, Silvio. 2013. Reinventing Professionalism: Journalism and News in Global Perspective. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, Barbie. 1993. “Journalists as Interpretive Communities.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 10(3):219–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Revers, M. (2017). Introduction: Textures and Porosities of Journalistic Fields. In: Contemporary Journalism in the US and Germany. Cultural Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51537-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51537-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51536-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51537-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics