Skip to main content

México: Educating Citizens for Social Justice in a Highly Unequal Country

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave International Handbook of Education for Citizenship and Social Justice

Abstract

The chapter analyzes the vicious circle of economic and political inequality in Mexico. It presents a critique of the view that education can be an equalizer given its economic value, and argues that the reduction of inequality in Mexico is not only about having a better-educated workforce, but also about enhancing the political competence of its citizens. Considering that redistributive policies beyond education are more likely to reverse inequality, this means educating citizens that are able to influence the arena in which such policies need to be made despite prevailing political inequalities. To this end, the chapter advances three main proposals for citizenship education in Mexico: (1) teaching and learning about inequality, (2) recognizing and developing students’ politicity, and (3) educating for effectiveness in political participation. These recommendations are the result of examining the gap between current citizenship education in Mexico and the citizens demanded by the existing context of inequality.

I am grateful to Professor Meira Levinson and James Noonan for their thoughtful and useful comments on the preliminary version of this chapter.This work was supported by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) under grant 251879.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Basic education in Mexico includes pre-school (3 years), primary education (6 years, ages 6 to 12 years) and secondary school (3 years, ages 12 to 15 years).

  2. 2.

    I use this term acknowledging that it has been the formal name of the subject only since 1999.

  3. 3.

    See Roldán (2012) and Latapí (2003).

  4. 4.

    See Latapí (2003), Levinson (2004) and Pérez Expósito (2013), for historical overviews of Civic and Moral Education in Mexico.

  5. 5.

    This new subject replaced civics and educational orientation, a course that was centred more on vocational, psychological and moral orientation, and was envisaged to serve as a guide for the process of students’ identity formation.

  6. 6.

    See, for instance, Great Britain (1998)

  7. 7.

    See Biesta (2011); Frazer (2007); Kahne and Westheimer (2006); Pérez Expósito (2014b, 2015a); Straume (2015), for a deeper analysis of the de-politicization of citizenship education.

  8. 8.

    See Pérez Expósito (2014b, 2015a).

References

  • Alvaredo, F., & Piketty, T. (2010). The dynamics of income concentration in developed and developing countries: A view from the top. In N. Lustig & L. F. López-Calva (Eds.), Declining inequality in Latin America: A decade of progress? New York: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • APSA-TaskForce (2004). American democracy in an age of rising inequality. Perspectives on Politics, 2(04), 651–666. doi:10.1017/S153759270404040X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. (2007). Measuring top incomes: Methodological issues. In A. B. Atkinson & T. Piketty (Eds.), Top incomes over the twentieth century: A contrast between continental European and English-speaking countries (pp. 18–42). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (1987). The micro-politics of the school : Towards a theory of school organization. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becerra, R., Salazar, P., & Woldenberg, J. (2000). La mecánica del cambio político en México: elecciones, partidos y reformas. México DF: Aguilar, León y Cal Editores.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biesta, G. (2011). Learning democracy in school and society education, lifelong learning, and the politics of citizenship. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bivens, J., Gould, E., Mishel, L., & Shierholz, H. (2014). Raising America’s pay. Why it’s our central economic policy challenge. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, Raymundo, Chávez, Emmanuel, & Esquivel, Gerardo (2014a). Los Ingresos Altos, la Tributación Óptima y la Recaudación Posible (Premio Nacional de Finanzas Públicas 2014). Centro de Estudios de las Finanzas Públicas, Cámara de Diputados.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, R., Esquivel, G., & Lustig, N. (2014b). The rise and fall of income inequality in Mexico, 1989–2010. In A. Cornia (Ed.), Falling inequality in Latin America: Policy changes and lessons (p. 140). Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, Raymundo, Chávez, Emmanuel, & Esquivel, Gerardo. (2015). A new approach for top income shares: Mexico Since the 1990’s. Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia: Latin American and Caribbean Economic Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, Anthony P, Jayasundera, Tamara, & Gulish, Artem. (2015). Good jobs are back. Retrieved from Washington, D.C.: https://cew.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/Good-Jobs_Full_Final.pdf

  • CDI. (2012). Los Pueblos Indígenas de México. Comisión Nacional para el Desarrollo de los Pueblos Indígenas. http://www.cdi.gob.mx/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1387&Itemid=2. Accessed 10/07/13.

  • CONEVAL. (2015). Comunicado de prensa no. 005. CONEVAL informa los resultados de la medición de pobreza 2014 [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.coneval.gob.mx/SalaPrensa/Documents/Comunicado005_Medicion_pobreza_2014.pdf

  • Crick, B., & Heater, D. B. (1977). Essays on political education. Ringmer: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esquivel, Gerardo. (2015). Desigualdad Extrema en México. Concentración del Poder Económico y Político. Retrieved from Mexico City:

    Google Scholar 

  • Esquivel, G., Lustig, N., & Scott, J. (2010). Mexico: A decade of falling inequality: Market forces or state action? In L. F. Lopez-Calva & N. Lustig (Eds.), Declining inequality in Latin America: A decade of progress (pp. 134–174). Washington D.C./New York: Brookings Institution Press and United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer, E. (2007). Depoliticising citizenship. British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(3), 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Great Britain (1998). Education for citizenship and the teaching of democracy in schools: Final report of the Advisory Group on Citizenship, Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillén Romo, H. (1997). La contrarrevolución neoliberal. México DF: Ediciones Era.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández Laos, E., Solís Rosales, R., & Stefanovich Henchoz, A. F. (2010). Mercado laboral de profesionistas en México. Diagnóstico (2000–2009) y prospectiva (2010 y 2020). México: ANUIES.

    Google Scholar 

  • INE. (2014). Informe país sobre la calidad de la ciudadanía en México. Retrieved from México DF:

    Google Scholar 

  • INEGI (2014). Anuario estadístico y geográfico de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos 2014. México: INEGI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahne, J., & Westheimer, J. (2006). The limits of political efficacy: Educating citizens for a democratic society. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39(02), 289–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansdown, G. (2005). The evolving capacities of the child. Florence: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latapí, P. (2003). El debate sobre los valores en la escuela mexicana. México: FCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legovini, A., Bouillon, C., & Lustig, N. (2005). Can education explain changes in income inequality in Mexico? In F. Bourguignon, F. H. G. Ferreira, & N. Lustig (Eds.), The microeconomics of income distrib ution dynamics in East Asia and Latin America. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. M. (2012). More than just test scores. PROSPECTS, 42(3), 269–284. doi:10.1007/s11125-012-9240-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. M., & Kelley, C. (1994). Can education do it alone? Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, B. A. U. (2004). Hopes and challenges for the new civic education in Mexico: Toward a democratic citizen without adjectives. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(3), 269–282. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2003.11.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loaeza, S. (2010). La metamorfosis del estado: del jacobinismo centralizador a la fragmentación democrática. In S. Loaeza & J. F. Prud’homme (Eds.), Los grandes problemas de México. Instituciones y procesos políticos. T-XIV. México DF: El Colegio de Mexico AC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (2005). Power: a radical view. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustig, N., Lopez-Calva, L. F., & Ortiz-Juarez, E. (2013). Declining inequality in Latin America in the 2000s: The cases of Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. World Development, 44, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, D. (1987). Political self-efficacy tested. American Political Science Review, 81(02), 571–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meneses Morales, E. (1986). Tendencias educativas oficiales en México, 1911–1934. Mexico DF: Centro de Estudios Educativos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, L. (1992). La Segunda Muerte de la Revolución Mexicana. México DF: Cal y Arena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitra, D. (2007). Student voice in school reform: From listening to leadership. In D. Thiessen & A. Cook-Sather (Eds.), International handbook of student experience in elementary and secondary school (pp. 727–744). Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Franco, M. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. American Political Science Review, 85, 1407–1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2012). OECD review of telecommunication policy and regulation in Mexico. Retrieved from 10.1787/9789264060111-en

  • OECD. (2014a). Country Note: United States. Education at a Glance 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014b). Education at a Glance 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2014c). Nota País: México. Panorama de la educación 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2015). Revenue statistics 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Expósito, Leonel. (2013). Studentsrepresentations of political participation: implications for citizenship education in Mexico Citys secondary schools. PhD in Education, Institute of Education, University of London, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Expósito, L. (2014a). La participación adolescente en la escuela secundaria: explorando lo deseable, lo potencial y lo permisible. Argumentos, 23(74), 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Expósito, L. (2014b). Rethinking political participation: A pedagogical approach for citizenship education. Theory and Research in Education, 12(2), 229–251. doi:10.1177/1477878514530713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Expósito, L. (2015a). Citizenship education in Mexico: The depoliticisation of adolescence through secondary school. International Studies in Sociology of Education. doi:10.1080/09620214.2015.1076705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Expósito, L. (2015b). Scope and quality of student participation in school: Towards an analytical framework for adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 20(3), 346–374. doi:10.1080/02673843.2015.1009920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. B. (2010). Aftershock : The next economy and America’s future (1st ed.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roldán, E. (2012). La escuela mexicana decimonónica como iniciación ceremonial. In A. A. Rodrigo & P. L. Caballero (Eds.), Ciudadanos Inesperados. Espacios de formación de la ciudadanía ayer y hoy. México DF: El Colegio de México/ DIE-CINVESTAV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, E. (2000). La trama de la escuela secundaria: institución, relaciones y saberes. México: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional y Plaza y Valdés.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEP. (2001). Formación Cívica y Ética, Educación Secundaria: libro para el maestro.Secretaría de Educación Pública. México DF: SEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEP. (2006). Formación Cívica y Ética. Fundamentación. México: SEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEP. (2007). Formación Cívica y Ética. Programa de estudios. México: SEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • SEP. (2011). Programas de estudio 2011. Guía para el Maestro. Educación Básica. Secundaria. Formación Cívica y Ética. México DF: SEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serriere, S., Mitra, D., & Cody, J. (2010). Young citizens take action for better school lunches. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 23(2), 4–8 . Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ncss/ssyl/2010/00000023/00000002/art00003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2013). The price of inequality. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straume, I. S. (2015). Democracy, education and the need for politics. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 1–17. doi:10.1007/s11217-015-9465-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tello, C. (2010). Sobre la desigualdad en México. México DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, & Nie, Norman Henry. (1987). Participation in America : Political democracy and social equality. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Nie, N. H. (1993). Citizen activity: Who participates? What do they say? The American Political Science Review, 87(2), 303–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, T. (2000). The service/politics split: Rethinking service to teach political engagement. PS: Political Science & Politics, 33(03), 647–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • WealthInsight. (2013). Number of multi-millionaires in mexico far exceeds global average [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.wealthinsight.com/pressrelease/number-of-multi-millionaires-in-mexico-far-exceeds-global-average

  • Westheimer, J. (2015). What kind of citizen?: Educating our children for the common good. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldenberg, J. (2011). La desigualdad en México. Revista de la Universidad de México, 87, 90–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pérez-Expósito, L. (2016). México: Educating Citizens for Social Justice in a Highly Unequal Country. In: Peterson, A., Hattam, R., Zembylas, M., Arthur, J. (eds) The Palgrave International Handbook of Education for Citizenship and Social Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51507-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51507-0_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51506-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51507-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics